• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

驾驶员执行功能评估方法的信度与效度

Reliability and Validity of a Method for Assessment of Executive Functions in Drivers.

作者信息

Racheva Rositsa, Totkova Zornitsa

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Institute for Population and Human Studies, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Acad. G. Bonchev St., Bl. 6, Fl. 5, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2020 Jan 19;10(1):37. doi: 10.3390/bs10010037.

DOI:10.3390/bs10010037
PMID:31963798
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7017126/
Abstract

The quality of drivers' performance is one of the crucial components related to road safety. One of the key cognitive characteristics related to the ability to drive safely are executive functions. The main goal of the presented research is to propose a new method (Trace-route task) for assessment of executive functions in drivers. The present article discusses the results of two consecutive studies. Study one aims to determine the validity and reliability of the method used and includes 134 participants, equally divided in two groups-people with disturbances in executive functions and people from the general population. Study two aims to assess the ability of the method to distinguish drivers with risky behavior. It includes 1440 participants divided in two groups-people with and without actual risky driving behavior. The results from the studies show that people with different neurological or psychiatric diseases and drivers with different road violations demonstrate worse planning ability, working memory, decision making, and cognitive flexibility. This data show that the trace-route task method is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing executive functions and has the ability to distinguish people with risky driving behavior from those who drive safely. This study reveals that the proposed method can be used for implementation in the area of traffic psychology.

摘要

驾驶员的表现质量是与道路安全相关的关键因素之一。与安全驾驶能力相关的关键认知特征之一是执行功能。本研究的主要目标是提出一种评估驾驶员执行功能的新方法(追踪路线任务)。本文讨论了两项连续研究的结果。研究一旨在确定所使用方法的有效性和可靠性,包括134名参与者,平均分为两组——执行功能有障碍的人和普通人群。研究二旨在评估该方法区分有危险行为驾驶员的能力。它包括1440名参与者,分为两组——有实际危险驾驶行为的人和没有实际危险驾驶行为的人。研究结果表明,患有不同神经或精神疾病的人和有不同道路违规行为的驾驶员表现出较差的规划能力、工作记忆、决策能力和认知灵活性。这些数据表明,追踪路线任务方法是评估执行功能的有效且可靠的工具,并且有能力区分有危险驾驶行为的人和安全驾驶的人。这项研究表明,所提出的方法可用于交通心理学领域的实践。

相似文献

1
Reliability and Validity of a Method for Assessment of Executive Functions in Drivers.驾驶员执行功能评估方法的信度与效度
Behav Sci (Basel). 2020 Jan 19;10(1):37. doi: 10.3390/bs10010037.
2
Impact of specific executive functions on driving performance in people with Parkinson's disease.特定执行功能对帕金森病患者驾驶表现的影响。
Mov Disord. 2013 Dec;28(14):1941-8. doi: 10.1002/mds.25660. Epub 2013 Oct 1.
3
P-drive on-road: internal scale validity and reliability of an assessment of on-road driving performance in people with neurological disorders.P驾驶在路上:神经系统疾病患者道路驾驶性能评估的内部量表效度和信度
Scand J Occup Ther. 2010;17(1):86-93. doi: 10.1080/11038120903071776.
4
Cognitive functioning differentially predicts different dimensions of older drivers' on-road safety.认知功能对老年驾驶员道路安全的不同维度具有不同的预测作用。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Feb;75:236-44. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.12.007. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
5
Driving difficulties as reported by older drivers with mild cognitive impairment and without neurological impairment.老年认知障碍但无神经功能障碍患者报告的驾驶困难。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(6):630-635. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1626986. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
6
The relation between cognitive control and risky driving in young novice drivers.年轻新手驾驶员的认知控制与危险驾驶之间的关系。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2015;22(1):61-72. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2013.838958. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
7
Exploring the contribution of executive functions to on-road driving performance during aging: A latent variable analysis.探讨执行功能在老年人道路驾驶表现中的贡献:潜在变量分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Jun;127:96-109. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.02.010. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
8
Investigating the self-reported behavior of drivers and their attitudes to traffic violations.调查驾驶员的自我报告行为及其对交通违法行为的态度。
J Safety Res. 2013 Sep;46:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2013.03.001. Epub 2013 Mar 19.
9
How accurately do drivers evaluate their own driving behavior? An on-road observational study.驾驶员如何准确评估自己的驾驶行为?一项基于道路的观察研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Feb;63:65-73. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.10.022. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
10
Effects of personality on risky driving behavior and accident involvement for Chinese drivers.个性对中国驾驶员冒险驾驶行为和事故参与的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14(6):565-71. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2012.748903.

引用本文的文献

1
Age-related effects of executive function on takeover performance in automated driving.执行功能对自动驾驶接管性能的年龄相关影响。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 30;12(1):5410. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08522-4.
2
Components of driving competency measurement in the elderly: A scoping review.老年人驾驶能力测量的组成部分:一项范围综述。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2021 Jan 5;35:2. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.35.2. eCollection 2021.
3
The Psychomotor Vigilance Test Compared to a Divided Attention Steering Simulation in Patients with Moderate or Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea.中度或重度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者的精神运动警觉性测试与分心驾驶模拟测试的比较
Nat Sci Sleep. 2020 Jul 23;12:509-524. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S256987. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Executive function and dangerous driving behaviors in young drivers.年轻驾驶员的执行功能与危险驾驶行为
Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2018 Jan;52:51-61. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2017.11.007.
2
Association Between Executive Function and Problematic Adolescent Driving.执行功能与青少年问题驾驶之间的关联
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2016 Nov/Dec;37(9):702-711. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000353.
3
Cognitive Tests and Determining Fitness to Drive in Dementia: A Systematic Review.认知测试与痴呆患者驾驶适宜性的判定:一项系统综述
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Sep;64(9):1904-17. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14180. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
4
Prediction of on-road driving ability after traumatic brain injury and stroke.颅脑损伤和脑卒中后道路驾驶能力的预测。
Eur J Neurol. 2013 Sep;20(9):1227-33. doi: 10.1111/ene.12172. Epub 2013 Apr 5.
5
Assessing executive function in relation to fitness to drive: a review of tools and their ability to predict safe driving.评估与驾驶适宜性相关的执行功能:工具及其预测安全驾驶能力的综述。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2012 Dec;59(6):402-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2011.00963.x. Epub 2011 Nov 13.
6
The Maze Test: A significant predictor of older driver crash risk.迷宫测试:老年驾驶员碰撞风险的重要预测指标。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Jan;50:483-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.05.025. Epub 2012 Jun 9.
7
Personality traits and executive functions related to on-road driving performance among older drivers.老年人驾驶员的人格特质与执行功能与道路行驶表现的关系。
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 Sep;43(5):1652-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.03.023. Epub 2011 Apr 22.
8
Assessment of executive functions: review of instruments and identification of critical issues.执行功能评估:工具综述与关键问题识别
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2008 Mar;23(2):201-16. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2007.08.010. Epub 2007 Dec 21.
9
The assessment of fitness to drive in people with dementia.对痴呆症患者驾驶适宜性的评估。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006 Nov;21(11):1044-51. doi: 10.1002/gps.1604.
10
Concurrent validity of the MAE visual naming test.MAE视觉命名测试的同时效度。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 1994 Jul;9(4):317-21.