The Mind Research Network/Lovelace Biomedical and Environmental Research Institute, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
J Neurotrauma. 2020 Jul 1;37(13):1504-1511. doi: 10.1089/neu.2019.6805. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
Pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (pmTBI) has received increased public scrutiny over the past decade, especially regarding children who experience persistent post-concussive symptoms (PPCS). However, several methods for defining PPCS exist in clinical and scientific literature, and even healthy children frequently exhibit non-specific, concussive-like symptoms. Inter-method agreement (six PPCS methods), observed misclassification rates, and other psychometric properties were examined in large cohorts of consecutively recruited adolescent patients with pmTBI ( = 162) 1 week and 4 months post-injury and in age/sex-matched healthy controls (HC; = 117) at equivalent time intervals. Six published PPCS methods were stratified into Simple Change (e.g., , 10th revision [ICD-10]) and Standardized Change (e.g., reliable change indices) algorithms. Among HC, test-retest reliability was fair to good across the 4-month assessment window, with evidence of bias (i.e., higher symptom ratings) during retrospective relative to other assessments. Misclassification rates among HC were higher (>30%) for Simple Change algorithms, with poor inter-rater reliability of symptom burden across HC and their parents. A 49% spread existed in terms of the proportion of pmTBI patients "diagnosed" with PPCS at 4 months, with superior inter-method agreement among standardized change algorithms. In conclusion, the self-reporting of symptom burden is only modestly reliable in typically developing adolescents over a 4-month period, with additional evidence for systematic bias in both adolescent and parental ratings. Significant variation existed for identifying pmTBI patients who had "recovered" (i.e., those who did not meet individual criteria for PPCS) from concussion across the six definitions, representing a considerable challenge for estimating the true incidence rate of PPCS in published literature. Although relatively straightforward to obtain, current findings question the utility of the most commonly used Simple Change scores for diagnosis of PPCS in clinical settings.
儿科轻度创伤性脑损伤(pmTBI)在过去十年中受到了公众的密切关注,尤其是那些患有持续性脑震荡后症状(PPCS)的儿童。然而,在临床和科学文献中存在几种定义 PPCS 的方法,即使是健康的儿童也经常表现出非特异性、类似脑震荡的症状。本研究在大型连续招募的青少年 pmTBI 患者队列(损伤后 1 周和 4 个月, = 162)和年龄/性别匹配的健康对照组(HC; = 117)中,检查了六种 PPCS 方法之间的一致性(inter-method agreement)、观察到的错误分类率(misclassification rates)以及其他心理测量特性。六种已发表的 PPCS 方法分为简单变化(例如,第 10 次修订版 [ICD-10])和标准化变化(例如,可靠变化指数)算法。在 HC 中,在 4 个月的评估窗口中,测试-重测信度从良好到中等,与其他评估相比,回溯时存在偏倚(即更高的症状评分)。在 HC 中,简单变化算法的错误分类率较高(>30%),且 HC 和他们的父母之间的症状负担的评分者间可靠性较差。在 4 个月时,pmTBI 患者“诊断”为 PPCS 的比例存在 49%的差异,标准化变化算法的一致性较好。总之,在通常情况下,典型的发育中的青少年在 4 个月内的症状负担自我报告的可靠性仅为中等,青少年和父母的评分中存在系统偏差的额外证据。在六种定义中,pmTBI 患者从脑震荡中“康复”(即不符合 PPCS 个别标准的患者)的识别存在显著差异,这代表了在发表文献中估计 PPCS 真实发生率的巨大挑战。尽管相对简单,但目前的研究结果质疑了在临床环境中使用最常用的简单变化评分来诊断 PPCS 的实用性。