Suppr超能文献

初级保健中生活方式干预对2型糖尿病的有效性:REAL HEALTH-糖尿病随机临床试验

Effectiveness of Lifestyle Intervention for Type 2 Diabetes in Primary Care: the REAL HEALTH-Diabetes Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Delahanty Linda M, Levy Douglas E, Chang Yuchiao, Porneala Bianca C, Goldman Valerie, McCarthy Jeanna, Bissett Laurie, Rodriguez Anthony Romeo, Chase Barbara, LaRocca Rajani, Wheeler Amy, Wexler Deborah J

机构信息

Diabetes Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Diabetes Research Center, Boston, MA, USA.

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Sep;35(9):2637-2646. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05629-9. Epub 2020 Jan 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Intensive lifestyle interventions (LI) improve outcomes in obesity and type 2 diabetes but are not currently available in usual care.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness and costs of two group LI programs, in-person LI and telephone conference call (telephone LI), to medical nutrition therapy (MNT) on weight loss in primary care patients with type 2 diabetes.

DESIGN

A randomized, assessor-blinded, practice-based clinical trial in three community health centers and one hospital-based practice affiliated with a single health system.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 208 primary care patients with type 2 diabetes, HbA1c 6.5 to < 11.5, and BMI > 25 kg/m (> 23 kg/m in Asians).

INTERVENTIONS

Dietitian-delivered in-person or telephone group LI programs with medication management or MNT referral.

MAIN MEASURES

Primary outcome: mean percent weight change.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

5% and 10% weight loss, change in HbA1c, and cost per kilogram lost.

KEY RESULTS

Participants' mean age was 62 (SD 10) years, 45% were male, and 77% were White, with BMI 35 (SD 5) kg/m and HbA1c 7.7 (SD 1.2). Seventy were assigned to in-person LI, 72 to telephone LI, and 69 to MNT. The mean percent weight loss (95% CI) at 6 and 12 months was 5.6% (4.4-6.8%) and 4.6% (3.1-6.1%) for in-person LI, 4.6% (3.3-6.0%) and 4.8% (3.3-6.2%) for telephone LI, and 1.1% (0.2-2.0%) and 2.0% (0.9-3.0%) for MNT, with statistically significant differences between each LI arm and MNT (P < 0.001) but not between LI arms (P = 0.63). HbA1c improved in all participants. Compared with MNT, the incremental cost per kilogram lost was $789 for in-person LI and $1223 for telephone LI.

CONCLUSIONS

In-person LI or telephone group LI can achieve good weight loss outcomes in primary care type 2 diabetes patients at a reasonable cost.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02320253.

摘要

背景

强化生活方式干预(LI)可改善肥胖症和2型糖尿病的治疗效果,但目前常规护理中无法提供此类干预。

目的

比较两种团体LI项目(面对面LI和电话会议LI)与医学营养治疗(MNT)对2型糖尿病初级护理患者体重减轻的有效性和成本。

设计

在三个社区卫生中心和一个隶属于单一卫生系统的医院诊所进行的一项随机、评估者盲法、基于实践的临床试验。

参与者

共有208名2型糖尿病初级护理患者,糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)为6.5至<11.5,体重指数(BMI)>25 kg/m²(亚洲人为>23 kg/m²)。

干预措施

由营养师提供面对面或电话团体LI项目,并进行药物管理或转介至MNT。

主要测量指标

主要结局:平均体重变化百分比。

次要结局

体重减轻5%和10%、HbA1c变化以及每减轻一公斤体重的成本。

关键结果

参与者的平均年龄为62(标准差为10)岁,45%为男性,77%为白人,BMI为35(标准差为5)kg/m²,HbA1c为7.7(标准差为1.2)。70人被分配到面对面LI组,72人被分配到电话LI组,69人被分配到MNT组。面对面LI组在6个月和12个月时的平均体重减轻百分比(95%置信区间)分别为5.6%(4.4 - 6.8%)和4.6%(3.1 - 6.1%),电话LI组分别为4.6%(3.3 - 6.0%)和4.8%(3.3 - 6.2%),MNT组分别为1.1%(0.2 - 2.0%)和2.0%(0.9 - 3.0%),每个LI组与MNT组之间存在统计学显著差异(P < 0.001),但LI组之间无差异(P = 0.63)。所有参与者的HbA1c均有所改善。与MNT相比,面对面LI每减轻一公斤体重的增量成本为789美元,电话LI为1223美元。

结论

面对面LI或电话团体LI可以使2型糖尿病初级护理患者以合理成本实现良好的体重减轻效果。

临床试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02320253。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

6
Treating Obesity-Moving From Recommendation to Implementation.治疗肥胖症——从建议到实施
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Nov 1;178(11):1447-1449. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.5259.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验