• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国关于潜在大流行病原体监督和实施政策的拟议变更。

Proposed Changes to U.S. Policy on Potential Pandemic Pathogen Oversight and Implementation.

机构信息

Center for Health Security, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Center for Communicable Disease Dynamics, Departments of Epidemiology and Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

mSphere. 2020 Jan 22;5(1):e00990-19. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00990-19.

DOI:10.1128/mSphere.00990-19
PMID:31969482
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6977183/
Abstract

We propose here changes to the U.S. government policy on potential pandemic pathogen (PPP) oversight and implementation, emphasizing transparency of the review process and the content of the review, publication of the review in advance, responsible publication of enhanced PPP research, high-level signoff on approvals of enhanced PPP experiments, and the need for a significant effort to establish a common international approach to enhanced PPP work. We advocate that the U.S. government recommend, and non-U.S. government funders and journals adopt, a set of best practices that would extend important considerations of biosafety and biosecurity to all work on enhanced potential pandemic pathogens regardless of funding source.

摘要

我们在这里提议对美国政府关于潜在大流行病原体(PPP)监督和实施的政策进行修改,强调审查过程和审查内容的透明度,提前公布审查结果,负责任地公布增强型 PPP 研究成果,对增强型 PPP 实验的批准进行高级别签字,并需要做出重大努力建立增强型 PPP 工作的共同国际方法。我们主张美国政府建议,并且非美国政府的资助者和期刊采用一套最佳实践,将生物安全和生物安保的重要考虑因素扩展到所有增强型潜在大流行病原体的工作,无论资金来源如何。

相似文献

1
Proposed Changes to U.S. Policy on Potential Pandemic Pathogen Oversight and Implementation.美国关于潜在大流行病原体监督和实施政策的拟议变更。
mSphere. 2020 Jan 22;5(1):e00990-19. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00990-19.
2
Beyond gain of function: strengthening oversight of research with potential pandemic pathogens.超越功能增益:加强对具有潜在大流行病原体的研究的监督。
Pathog Glob Health. 2024 May;118(3):197-208. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2023.2265627. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
3
Bridging biosafety and biosecurity gaps: DURC and ePPP policy insights from U.S. institutions.弥合生物安全与生物安保差距:来自美国机构的两用研究关注(DURC)和公私合作计划(ePPP)政策见解
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Sep 25;12:1476527. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1476527. eCollection 2024.
4
Horsepox and the need for a new norm, more transparency, and stronger oversight for experiments that pose pandemic risks.马痘以及对新规范、更高透明度和对具有大流行风险的实验进行更强有力监督的需求。
PLoS Pathog. 2018 Oct 4;14(10):e1007129. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007129. eCollection 2018 Oct.
5
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
6
Pandemic legislation in the European Union: Fit for purpose? The need for a systematic comparison of national laws.欧盟大流行立法:是否符合目的?需要对各国法律进行系统比较。
Health Policy. 2017 Oct;121(10):1021-1024. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.08.009. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
7
Updated preparedness and response framework for influenza pandemics.流感大流行的最新准备和应对框架。
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2014 Sep 26;63(RR-06):1-18.
8
Dual-use research and research using enhanced pathogens in high-income countries: whose business?高收入国家两用研究和使用增强病原体的研究:谁的业务?
mSphere. 2024 Jul 30;9(7):e0016824. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00168-24. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
9
Gain-of-Function Research: Ethical Analysis.功能获得性研究:伦理分析。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Aug;22(4):923-964. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9810-1. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
10
Biosafety Oversight and Compliance: What do you Mean, I have to Fill Out Another Form?!生物安全监督与合规:你说什么?我还得再填一份表格?!
Curr Protoc Microbiol. 2015 Nov 3;39:1A.5.1-1A.5.16. doi: 10.1002/9780471729259.mc01a05s39.

引用本文的文献

1
Bridging biosafety and biosecurity gaps: DURC and ePPP policy insights from U.S. institutions.弥合生物安全与生物安保差距:来自美国机构的两用研究关注(DURC)和公私合作计划(ePPP)政策见解
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Sep 25;12:1476527. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1476527. eCollection 2024.
2
Beyond Biosecurity by Taxonomic Lists: Lessons, Challenges, and Opportunities.超越按分类清单进行的生物安全:经验教训、挑战与机遇
Health Secur. 2023 Nov-Dec;21(6):521-529. doi: 10.1089/hs.2022.0109. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
3
The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic.《柳叶刀》新冠疫情对未来的启示委员会
Lancet. 2022 Oct 8;400(10359):1224-1280. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01585-9. Epub 2022 Sep 14.
4
Rethinking Gain-of-Function Experiments in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic.重新思考 COVID-19 大流行背景下的功能获得性实验。
mBio. 2020 Aug 7;11(4):e01868-20. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01868-20.

本文引用的文献

1
Controversial flu studies can resume, U.S. panel says.美国专家小组表示,有争议的流感研究可以恢复。
Science. 2019 Feb 15;363(6428):676-677. doi: 10.1126/science.363.6428.676.