Suppr超能文献

探索心脏团队过去、现在和未来的现有证据:叙事性综述。

Exploring Current Evidence on the Past, the Present, and the Future of the Heart Team: A Narrative Review.

机构信息

Department of Interventional Cardiology, Cardiovascular Diseases Institute, Iasi, Romania.

"Grigore T. Popa" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Ther. 2020 Jan 4;2020:9241081. doi: 10.1155/2020/9241081. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Including healthcare professionals dealing with cardiovascular diseases, Heart Team is a concept/structure designed for selecting diagnostic strategies, facilitating therapeutic decisions, and improving cardiovascular outcomes in patients with complex heart pathologies, requiring input from different subspecialties and the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach. The aim of this narrative review is to search for and to summarize current evidence regarding Heart Team and to underline the future directions for the development of this concept.

METHODS

We searched the electronic database of PubMed, SCOPUS, and Cochrane CENTRAL for studies including Heart Team. Forty-eight studies were included, if reference was made to Heart Team structure and functionality.

RESULTS

We depicted the structure and the timeline of Heart Team, along with actual evidence-based recommendations from European Guidelines. We underlined the importance of quality of knowledge-sharing and decision-making inside the Team, analyzing bad decisions which did not reflect members' true beliefs due to "." The observation that Guidelines' indications regarding Heart Team carry a level C indication underlines the very future of this Team: randomized controlled trials proving solid benefits in an evidence-based world.

CONCLUSIONS

Envisioned as a tool for optimizing the management of various complex cardiovascular pathologies, Heart Team should simplify and facilitate the activity in the cardiovascular ward. Finally, these facts should be translated into better cardiovascular outcomes and a lower psychological distress among Team participants. Despite all future changes, there must always be a constant part: the patient should remain at the very center of the Team.

摘要

简介

心脏团队包括处理心血管疾病的医疗保健专业人员,是为选择诊断策略、促进治疗决策以及改善患有复杂心脏病理的患者的心血管结局而设计的一个概念/结构,需要来自不同亚专业的投入和多学科方法的必要性。本叙述性综述的目的是寻找和总结当前关于心脏团队的证据,并强调这一概念未来的发展方向。

方法

我们在 PubMed、SCOPUS 和 Cochrane CENTRAL 的电子数据库中搜索了包含心脏团队的研究。如果参考了心脏团队的结构和功能,则纳入了 48 项研究。

结果

我们描述了心脏团队的结构和时间线,以及欧洲指南的实际循证推荐。我们强调了团队内部知识共享和决策质量的重要性,分析了由于“。”导致的不符合成员真实信念的不良决策。观察到指南关于心脏团队的指示带有 C 级指示,这突出了该团队的未来非常重要:随机对照试验在循证的世界中证明了确凿的益处。

结论

心脏团队被设想为优化各种复杂心血管疾病管理的工具,应简化和促进心血管病房的工作。最终,这些事实应该转化为更好的心血管结局和团队参与者更低的心理困扰。尽管未来会发生所有变化,但必须始终有一个不变的部分:患者应始终处于团队的中心。

相似文献

1
Exploring Current Evidence on the Past, the Present, and the Future of the Heart Team: A Narrative Review.
Cardiovasc Ther. 2020 Jan 4;2020:9241081. doi: 10.1155/2020/9241081. eCollection 2020.
2
New approaches to providing individualized diabetes care in the 21st century.
Curr Diabetes Rev. 2015;11(4):222-30. doi: 10.2174/1573399811666150421110316.
3
Disruptive Innovation and the Specialty of Anesthesiology: the Case for the Perioperative Surgical Home.
Anesth Analg. 2015 May;120(5):1155-1157. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000697.
4
The Future of Anesthesiology: Should the Perioperative Surgical Home Redefine Us?
Anesth Analg. 2015 May;120(5):1142-1148. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000711.
5
No "i" in Heart Team: incentivizing multidisciplinary care in cardiovascular medicine.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 May;5(3):410-3. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.966101.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
[The user oriented hospital - chances and challenges for the healthcare industry].
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(8):616-23. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.07.019. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term survival after multidisciplinary heart team-guided management of complex coronary artery disease.
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2025 Jun 20;38(5):589-597. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2025.2516981. eCollection 2025.
2
Heart Transplantation and Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Long-Term Prognosis and Effects on Mental Health.
Cureus. 2024 Sep 5;16(9):e68691. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68691. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Predictors of Mortality Following Aortic Valve Replacement in Aortic Stenosis Patients.
Pathophysiology. 2022 Mar 9;29(1):106-117. doi: 10.3390/pathophysiology29010010.
4
Cardionephrology from the point of view of the cardiologist: no more agree to disagree-getting to 'yes' for every patient.
Clin Kidney J. 2021 May 18;14(9):1995-1999. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfab092. eCollection 2021 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Evolving paradigms in valvular heart disease: where should guidelines move?
EuroIntervention. 2019 Nov 20;15(10):851-856. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00818.
2
'Ten commandments' for the 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization.
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):79-80. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy855.
3
The evolution of minimally invasive cardiac surgery: from minimal access to transcatheter approaches.
Future Cardiol. 2018 Jan;14(1):75-87. doi: 10.2217/fca-2017-0048. Epub 2017 Dec 4.
4
Collaborative Care and Related Interventions in Patients With Heart Disease: An Update and New Directions.
Psychosomatics. 2018 Jan-Feb;59(1):1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
5
'Heart Team' Concept - A reality or a 'Platonic Illusion'.
Indian Heart J. 2017 Sep-Oct;69(5):681-683. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2017.02.005. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
8
2017 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.
Eur Heart J. 2017 Sep 21;38(36):2739-2791. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx391.
9
The coronary heart team.
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2017 Sep;32(5):627-632. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000432.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验