Rosenholtz Ruth
MIT Department of Brain & Cognitive Sciences, CSAIL, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Jun;82(3):901-925. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01968-1.
Human beings subjectively experience a rich visual percept. However, when behavioral experiments probe the details of that percept, observers perform poorly, suggesting that vision is impoverished. What can explain this awareness puzzle? Is the rich percept a mere illusion? How does vision work as well as it does? This paper argues for two important pieces of the solution. First, peripheral vision encodes its inputs using a scheme that preserves a great deal of useful information, while losing the information necessary to perform certain tasks. The tasks rendered difficult by the peripheral encoding include many of those used to probe the details of visual experience. Second, many tasks used to probe attentional and working memory limits are, arguably, inherently difficult, and poor performance on these tasks may indicate limits on decision complexity. Two assumptions are critical to making sense of this hypothesis: (1) All visual perception, conscious or not, results from performing some visual task; and (2) all visual tasks face the same limit on decision complexity. Together, peripheral encoding plus decision complexity can explain a wide variety of phenomena, including vision's marvelous successes, its quirky failures, and our rich subjective impression of the visual world.
人类主观上体验到丰富的视觉感知。然而,当行为实验探究这种感知的细节时,观察者的表现却很差,这表明视觉信息是匮乏的。如何解释这种认知难题呢?这种丰富的感知仅仅是一种错觉吗?视觉是如何如此有效地工作的呢?本文提出了解决方案的两个重要部分。首先,外周视觉使用一种编码输入的方案,该方案保留了大量有用信息,同时丢失了执行某些任务所需的信息。由外周编码导致难以完成的任务包括许多用于探究视觉体验细节的任务。其次,可以说,许多用于探究注意力和工作记忆极限的任务本质上就很困难,在这些任务上表现不佳可能表明决策复杂性存在极限。理解这一假设的两个关键假设是:(1)所有视觉感知,无论是否有意识,都是执行某种视觉任务的结果;(2)所有视觉任务在决策复杂性上面临相同的极限。外周编码加上决策复杂性共同可以解释各种各样的现象,包括视觉的巨大成功、奇怪的失败以及我们对视觉世界丰富的主观印象。