Deochand Neil, Costello Mack S, Deochand Michelle E
1Health and Human Services Department, University of Cincinnati, 450H Teachers-Dyer Complex, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA.
2Department of Psychology, Rider University, 2083 Lawrenceville Road, Lawrenceville, NJ 08648 USA.
Perspect Behav Sci. 2018 Nov 9;41(2):447-464. doi: 10.1007/s40614-018-00176-w. eCollection 2018 Nov.
This article serves as a brief primer on planaria for behavior scientists. In the 1950s and 1960s, McConnell's planarian laboratory posited that conditioned behavior could transfer after regeneration, and through cannibalization of trained planaria. These studies, the responses, and replications have been collectively referred to as the "planarian controversy." Successful behavioral assays still require refinement with this organism, but they could add valuable insight into our conceptualization of memory and learning. We discuss how the planarian's distinctive biology enables an examination of biobehavioral interaction models, and what behavior scientists must consider if they are to advance behavioral research with this organism. Suggestions for academics interested in building planaria learning laboratories are offered.
本文为行为科学家提供了一篇关于涡虫的简要入门介绍。在20世纪50年代和60年代,麦康奈尔的涡虫实验室提出,条件行为在再生后以及通过食用受过训练的涡虫后可以转移。这些研究、回应和复制研究被统称为“涡虫争议”。使用这种生物进行的成功行为分析仍需完善,但它们可以为我们对记忆和学习的概念化提供有价值的见解。我们讨论了涡虫独特的生物学特性如何有助于检验生物行为相互作用模型,以及行为科学家若要推进对这种生物的行为研究必须考虑哪些因素。本文还为有兴趣建立涡虫学习实验室的学者提供了建议。