• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估“阅读起步走”项目对诊所价值观、态度和知识的影响。

Evaluating the Effect of Reach Out and Read on Clinic Values, Attitudes, and Knowledge.

作者信息

Burton Heather, Navsaria Dipesh

机构信息

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin,

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.

出版信息

WMJ. 2019 Dec;118(4):177-181.

PMID:31978286
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Reach Out and Read is a primary care clinic-based early childhood literacy promotion program that facilitates discussion around literacy and encourages shared reading at home. No prior studies have examined the effect of program implementation on clinic staff and clinic values, attitudes, and knowledge related to early literacy. The hypothesis of this study was that Reach Out and Read implementation not only improves early childhood literacy promotion, but also improves aspects of the clinician's work environment. Understanding the potential effects of this program on clinic staff is important, since many clinics will implement this program in the near future.

METHODS

Semistructured key informant interviews were performed with 10 study clinics with Reach Out and Read and 7 control clinics. Interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed according to standard qualitative research protocol. Comparisons were made for differences in clinic morale and attitudes towards early childhood literacy. A secondary analysis examined practice and workplace changes in study clinics.

RESULTS

The coded transcripts showed that clinicians at the majority of the study clinics believed that the program boosted clinic morale, increased provider satisfaction, improved patient-clinician relationships, and promoted a literacy-rich environment. Compared to clinicians in control clinics, clinicians in study clinics were more likely to report that they played a large role in promoting literacy and reported having more consistent literacy discussion in visits. Funding was the only concern mentioned consistently by clinics with Reach Out and Read.

CONCLUSION

Understanding potential changes that can occur in clinics because of the Reach Out and Read program is crucial to help clinics adequately prepare for the implementation process. Knowing that this program has many advantages and few disadvantages in clinics may encourage more participation. Further studies should compare clinics with Reach Out and Read to those with no interest in the program to determine if results from this study can be more broadly generalized.

摘要

目的

“伸出援手阅读”是一项基于初级保健诊所的幼儿识字推广项目,该项目促进围绕识字的讨论,并鼓励在家中进行亲子共读。此前尚无研究考察项目实施对诊所工作人员以及与早期识字相关的诊所价值观、态度和知识的影响。本研究的假设是,“伸出援手阅读”项目的实施不仅能改善幼儿识字推广情况,还能改善临床医生的工作环境。了解该项目对诊所工作人员的潜在影响很重要,因为许多诊所将在不久的将来实施此项目。

方法

对10家开展“伸出援手阅读”项目的研究诊所和7家对照诊所进行了半结构化关键 informant 访谈。访谈内容根据标准定性研究方案进行转录、编码和分析。比较了诊所士气以及对幼儿识字态度方面的差异。二次分析考察了研究诊所的实践和工作场所变化。

结果

编码后的访谈记录显示,大多数研究诊所的临床医生认为该项目提高了诊所士气、增加了提供者满意度、改善了医患关系,并营造了一个识字氛围浓厚的环境。与对照诊所的临床医生相比,研究诊所的临床医生更有可能报告他们在促进识字方面发挥了重要作用,并报告在就诊时有更一致的识字讨论。资金是开展“伸出援手阅读”项目的诊所唯一一致提到的担忧。

结论

了解因“伸出援手阅读”项目可能在诊所发生的潜在变化对于帮助诊所充分为实施过程做好准备至关重要。知道该项目在诊所优点多缺点少可能会鼓励更多参与。进一步的研究应将开展“伸出援手阅读”项目的诊所与对该项目不感兴趣的诊所进行比较,以确定本研究的结果是否能更广泛地推广。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the Effect of Reach Out and Read on Clinic Values, Attitudes, and Knowledge.评估“阅读起步走”项目对诊所价值观、态度和知识的影响。
WMJ. 2019 Dec;118(4):177-181.
2
Reach Out and Read: a pediatric clinic-based approach to early literacy promotion.“伸出手阅读”:一种基于儿科诊所的早期读写能力促进方法。
J Pediatr Health Care. 2002 Jan-Feb;16(1):10-5.
3
Effectiveness of a Clinic-Based Early Literacy Program in Changing Parent-Child Early Literacy Habits.一项基于诊所的早期读写能力项目在改变亲子早期读写习惯方面的有效性。
WMJ. 2016 Dec;115(6):300-5.
4
Clinician Experiences With Reach Out and Read: An Exploratory Qualitative Analysis.临床医生对“伸出与阅读”项目的体验:一项探索性定性分析。
Acad Pediatr. 2021 Aug;21(6):961-967. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2021.01.011. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
5
Training Pediatric Residents in Literacy Promotion: Residency Directors' Perspectives.培训儿科住院医师进行读写能力促进:住院医师主任的观点。
Teach Learn Med. 2020 Jan-Mar;32(1):45-52. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2019.1598866. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
6
A pediatric clinic-based approach to early literacy promotion--experience in a well-baby clinic in Taiwan.儿科诊所为基础的早期读写促进方法——台湾一家婴幼儿保健诊所的经验。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2012 May;111(5):258-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2011.05.008. Epub 2012 Apr 28.
7
The effect of a literacy training program on family medicine residents.一项读写能力培训计划对家庭医学住院医师的影响。
Fam Med. 2004 Sep;36(8):582-7.
8
Early Literacy Promotion Using Automated Hovering Among Young Minority Children.利用自动悬停技术促进少数民族儿童早期读写能力发展。
Acad Pediatr. 2024 Aug;24(6):900-904. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2023.11.010. Epub 2023 Nov 11.
9
Improving early literacy promotion: a quality-improvement project for Reach Out and Read.提高早期读写能力推广:伸出阅读之手的质量改进项目。
Pediatrics. 2011 Apr;127(4):e1067-72. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-2290. Epub 2011 Mar 14.
10
Parent-provider paediatric literacy communication: A curriculum for future primary care providers.家长-医生儿科读写能力沟通:未来初级保健提供者课程。
Perspect Med Educ. 2019 Apr;8(2):110-117. doi: 10.1007/s40037-019-0503-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Intended Outcomes and Core Components of Primary Care-Based Literacy Promotion as Defined by Experts.专家定义的基于初级保健的素养提升的预期成果和核心组成部分。
Acad Pediatr. 2025 Aug 28:103141. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2025.103141.
2
Reach Out and Read Implementation: A Scoping Review.伸出援手并阅读实施情况:范围综述。
Acad Pediatr. 2023 Apr;23(3):520-549. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2022.11.012. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
3
Chronic pediatric diseases and risk for reading difficulties: a narrative review with recommendations.儿童慢性疾病与阅读困难风险:综述性叙述及建议
Pediatr Res. 2022 Oct;92(4):966-978. doi: 10.1038/s41390-022-01934-y. Epub 2022 Feb 4.