Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Mar;131(3):625-634. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.11.060. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
We conducted intraoperative measurements of tremor to quantify the effects of temporally patterned ramped-frequency DBS trains on tremor.
Seven patterns of stimulation were tested in nine subjects with thalamic DBS for essential tremor: stimulation 'off', three ramped-frequency stimulation (RFS) trains from 130 → 50 Hz, 130 → 60 Hz, and 235 → 90 Hz, and three constant frequency stimulation (CFS) trains at 72, 82, and 130 Hz. The same patterns were applied to a computational model of the thalamic neural network.
Temporally patterned 130 → 60 Hz ramped-frequency trains suppressed tremor relative to stimulation 'off,' but 130 → 50 Hz, 130 → 60 Hz, and 235 → 90 Hz ramped-frequency trains were no more effective than constant frequency stimulation with the same mean interpulse interval (IPI). Computational modeling revealed that rhythmic burst-driver inputs to thalamus were masked during DBS, but long IPIs, concurrent with pauses in afferent cerebellar and cortical firing, allowed propagation of bursting activity. The mean firing rate of bursting-type model neurons as well as the firing pattern entropy of model neurons were both strongly correlated with tremor power across stimulation conditions.
Frequency-ramped DBS produced equivalent tremor suppression as constant frequency thalamic DBS. Tremor-related thalamic burst activity may result from burst-driver input, rather than by an intrinsic rebound mechanism.
Ramping stimulation frequency may exacerbate thalamic burst firing by introducing consecutive pauses of increasing duration to the stimulation pattern.
我们进行术中震颤测量,以量化时变斜坡频率刺激对震颤的影响。
对 9 例丘脑刺激治疗特发性震颤的患者进行了 7 种刺激模式的测试:刺激“关闭”,3 种斜坡频率刺激(RFS)从 130→50 Hz、130→60 Hz 和 235→90 Hz,以及 3 种恒频刺激(CFS)在 72、82 和 130 Hz。相同的模式应用于丘脑神经网络的计算模型。
与刺激“关闭”相比,时变 130→60 Hz 斜坡频率刺激抑制震颤,但 130→50 Hz、130→60 Hz 和 235→90 Hz 斜坡频率刺激与相同平均脉冲间隔(IPI)的恒频刺激一样有效。计算模型表明,丘脑的节律性爆发驱动输入在 DBS 期间被掩盖,但长 IPI 与传入小脑和皮质放电暂停同时发生,允许爆发活动传播。爆发型模型神经元的平均放电率以及模型神经元的放电模式熵都与刺激条件下的震颤功率呈强烈相关。
频率斜坡 DBS 产生与恒频丘脑 DBS 相同的震颤抑制效果。与震颤相关的丘脑爆发活动可能是由爆发驱动输入引起的,而不是由内在的反弹机制引起的。
刺激频率的斜坡可能会通过向刺激模式引入连续的、持续时间越来越长的暂停来加剧丘脑的爆发放电。