Duke Univ., Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Hudson Hall, Rm. 136, Box 90281, Durham, NC 27708-0281, USA.
J Neurophysiol. 2012 Jan;107(1):364-83. doi: 10.1152/jn.00906.2010. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) provides dramatic tremor relief when delivered at high-stimulation frequencies (more than ∼100 Hz), but its mechanisms of action are not well-understood. Previous studies indicate that high-frequency stimulation is less effective when the stimulation train is temporally irregular. The purpose of this study was to determine the specific characteristics of temporally irregular stimulus trains that reduce their effectiveness: long pauses, bursts, or irregularity per se. We isolated these characteristics in stimulus trains and conducted intraoperative measurements of postural tremor in eight volunteers. Tremor varied significantly across stimulus conditions (P < 0.015), and stimulus trains with pauses were significantly less effective than stimulus trains without (P < 0.002). There were no significant differences in tremor between trains with or without bursts or between trains that were irregular or periodic. Thus the decreased effectiveness of temporally irregular DBS trains is due to long pauses in the stimulus trains, not the degree of temporal irregularity alone. We also conducted computer simulations of neuronal responses to the experimental stimulus trains using a biophysical model of the thalamic network. Trains that suppressed tremor in volunteers also suppressed fluctuations in thalamic transmembrane potential at the frequency associated with cerebellar burst-driver inputs. Clinical and computational findings indicate that DBS suppresses tremor by masking burst-driver inputs to the thalamus and that pauses in stimulation prevent such masking. Although stimulation of other anatomic targets may provide tremor suppression, we propose that the most relevant neuronal targets for effective tremor suppression are the afferent cerebellar fibers that terminate in the thalamus.
深部脑刺激 (DBS) 在高刺激频率(超过 ∼100 Hz)下提供显著的震颤缓解,但作用机制尚不清楚。先前的研究表明,当刺激列车具有不规则的时间时,高频刺激的效果较差。本研究的目的是确定降低其有效性的时间不规则刺激列车的具体特征:长暂停、突发或不规则本身。我们在刺激列车中分离出这些特征,并在 8 名志愿者中进行了姿势震颤的术中测量。震颤在刺激条件之间变化显著(P < 0.015),具有暂停的刺激列车比没有暂停的刺激列车(P < 0.002)的效果显著降低。具有突发或不规则或周期性的列车之间的震颤没有显著差异。因此,时间不规则的 DBS 列车的有效性降低是由于刺激列车中的长暂停,而不是时间不规则性的程度。我们还使用丘脑网络的生物物理模型对实验刺激列车的神经元反应进行了计算机模拟。在志愿者中抑制震颤的列车也抑制了与小脑突发驱动输入相关的频率下丘脑跨膜电位的波动。临床和计算结果表明,DBS 通过掩盖对丘脑的突发驱动输入来抑制震颤,而刺激的暂停可防止这种掩蔽。尽管对其他解剖靶点的刺激可能提供震颤抑制,但我们提出,用于有效震颤抑制的最相关神经元靶点是终止于丘脑的传入小脑纤维。