• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多套全球土地覆盖产品的耕地分布巧合分析。

Coincidence Analysis of the Cropland Distribution of Multi-Sets of Global Land Cover Products.

机构信息

Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.

Key Laboratory of Environment Change and Natural Disaster, Ministry of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 22;17(3):707. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030707.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17030707
PMID:31979045
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7036794/
Abstract

Modern global cropland products have been widely used to assess the impact of land use and cover change (LUCC) on carbon budgets, climate change, terrestrial ecosystems, etc. However, each product has its own uncertainty, and inconsistencies exist among different products. Understanding the reliability of these datasets is essential for knowing the uncertainties that exist in the study of global change impact forced by cropland reclamation. In this paper, we propose a set of coincidence assessments to identify where reliable cropland distribution is by overlaying ten widely used global land cover/cropland datasets around 2000 AD. A quantitative assessment for different spatial units is also performed. We further discuss the spatial distribution characteristics of different coincidence degrees and explain the reasons. The results show that the high-coincidence proportion is only 40.5% around the world, and the moderate-coincidence and low-coincidence proportion is 18.4% and 41.1%, respectively. The coincidence degrees among different continents and countries have large discrepancies. The coincidence is relatively higher in Europe, South Asia and North America, while it is very poor in Latin America and Africa. The spatial distribution of high and moderate coincidence roughly corresponds to the regions with suitable agricultural conditions and intensive reclamation. In addition to the random factors such as the product's quality and the year it represented, the low coincidence is mainly caused by the inconsistent land cover classification systems and the recognition capability of cropland pixels with low fractions in different products.

摘要

现代全球耕地产品已被广泛用于评估土地利用和覆被变化 (LUCC) 对碳预算、气候变化、陆地生态系统等的影响。然而,每种产品都有其自身的不确定性,不同产品之间存在不一致性。了解这些数据集的可靠性对于了解耕地开垦对全球变化影响研究中存在的不确定性至关重要。在本文中,我们提出了一套一致性评估方法,通过叠加十套广泛使用的全球土地覆盖/耕地数据集,确定可靠的耕地分布位置,时间范围为公元 2000 年左右。我们还对不同空间单元进行了定量评估。我们进一步讨论了不同一致性程度的空间分布特征,并解释了原因。结果表明,全球范围内高一致性比例仅为 40.5%,中一致性和低一致性比例分别为 18.4%和 41.1%。不同大陆和国家之间的一致性程度存在很大差异。欧洲、南亚和北美地区的一致性相对较高,而拉丁美洲和非洲地区的一致性则非常差。高一致性和中一致性的空间分布大致对应于农业条件适宜和开垦强度较大的地区。除了产品质量和代表年份等随机因素外,低一致性主要是由于不一致的土地覆盖分类系统和不同产品中低分数耕地像素的识别能力造成的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc33/7036794/cc0503622e6b/ijerph-17-00707-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc33/7036794/6f5e39a34080/ijerph-17-00707-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc33/7036794/7fdf96970991/ijerph-17-00707-g0A2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc33/7036794/9ab1d281b131/ijerph-17-00707-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc33/7036794/cc0503622e6b/ijerph-17-00707-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc33/7036794/6f5e39a34080/ijerph-17-00707-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc33/7036794/7fdf96970991/ijerph-17-00707-g0A2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc33/7036794/9ab1d281b131/ijerph-17-00707-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc33/7036794/cc0503622e6b/ijerph-17-00707-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Coincidence Analysis of the Cropland Distribution of Multi-Sets of Global Land Cover Products.多套全球土地覆盖产品的耕地分布巧合分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 22;17(3):707. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030707.
2
Effect of land-cover change on terrestrial carbon dynamics in the southern United States.美国南部土地覆盖变化对陆地碳动态的影响。
J Environ Qual. 2006 Jul 6;35(4):1533-47. doi: 10.2134/jeq2005.0198. Print 2006 Jul-Aug.
3
A large-area, spatially continuous assessment of land cover map error and its impact on downstream analyses.大面积、空间连续的土地覆盖图误差评估及其对下游分析的影响。
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Jan;24(1):322-337. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13904. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
4
Land and people, the growing pressure.土地和人口,压力与日俱增。
Earthwatch. 1983(13):1-8.
5
Combining global land cover datasets to quantify agricultural expansion into forests in Latin America: Limitations and challenges.结合全球土地覆盖数据集量化拉丁美洲农业向森林的扩张:局限性与挑战。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 13;12(7):e0181202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181202. eCollection 2017.
6
Global cropland could be almost halved: Assessment of land saving potentials under different strategies and implications for agricultural markets.全球耕地面积可能减少近一半:不同策略下的耕地节约潜力评估及其对农业市场的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 22;17(2):e0263063. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263063. eCollection 2022.
7
Global distribution, trends and types of active fire occurrences.全球活跃火灾发生的分布、趋势及类型。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Dec 1;902:166456. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166456. Epub 2023 Aug 20.
8
Global simulation of fine resolution land use/cover change and estimation of aboveground biomass carbon under the shared socioeconomic pathways.在共享社会经济路径下,对细分辨率土地利用/覆被变化进行全球模拟及估算地上生物量碳。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Jun 15;312:114943. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114943. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
9
Spatio-temporal pattern and rationality of land reclamation and cropland abandonment in mid-eastern Inner Mongolia of China in 1990-2005.1990-2005 年中国内蒙古中东部耕地开垦与撂荒的时空格局及其合理性。
Environ Monit Assess. 2011 Aug;179(1-4):137-53. doi: 10.1007/s10661-010-1724-9. Epub 2010 Oct 15.
10
Future urban land expansion and implications for global croplands.未来城市土地扩张及其对全球耕地的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Aug 22;114(34):8939-8944. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1606036114. Epub 2016 Dec 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Stable classification with limited sample: transferring a 30-m resolution sample set collected in 2015 to mapping 10-m resolution global land cover in 2017.有限样本下的稳定分类:将2015年收集的30米分辨率样本集用于绘制2017年10米分辨率的全球土地覆盖图。
Sci Bull (Beijing). 2019 Mar 30;64(6):370-373. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
2
A large-area, spatially continuous assessment of land cover map error and its impact on downstream analyses.大面积、空间连续的土地覆盖图误差评估及其对下游分析的影响。
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Jan;24(1):322-337. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13904. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
3
A Synergy Cropland of China by Fusing Multiple Existing Maps and Statistics.
中国的协同农田:融合多种现有地图和统计数据。
Sensors (Basel). 2017 Jul 12;17(7):1613. doi: 10.3390/s17071613.
4
Assessing the influence of historic net and gross land changes on the carbon fluxes of Europe.评估历史时期净和总土地变化对欧洲碳通量的影响。
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Jul;22(7):2526-39. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13191. Epub 2016 Feb 25.
5
Mapping global cropland and field size.绘制全球耕地和地块图。
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 May;21(5):1980-92. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12838. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
6
Exploring global changes in nitrogen and phosphorus cycles in agriculture induced by livestock production over the 1900-2050 period.探究 1900-2050 年期间由畜牧业生产引起的农业氮磷循环的全球变化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Dec 24;110(52):20882-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1012878108. Epub 2011 May 16.
7
Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity.全球土地利用变化、经济全球化与迫在眉睫的土地短缺
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 1;108(9):3465-72. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1100480108. Epub 2011 Feb 14.
8
An Earth-system perspective of the global nitrogen cycle.全球氮循环的地球系统视角。
Nature. 2008 Jan 17;451(7176):293-6. doi: 10.1038/nature06592.