Suppr超能文献

全球土地利用变化、经济全球化与迫在眉睫的土地短缺

Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity.

机构信息

School of Earth Sciences and Woods Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 1;108(9):3465-72. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1100480108. Epub 2011 Feb 14.

Abstract

A central challenge for sustainability is how to preserve forest ecosystems and the services that they provide us while enhancing food production. This challenge for developing countries confronts the force of economic globalization, which seeks cropland that is shrinking in availability and triggers deforestation. Four mechanisms-the displacement, rebound, cascade, and remittance effects-that are amplified by economic globalization accelerate land conversion. A few developing countries have managed a land use transition over the recent decades that simultaneously increased their forest cover and agricultural production. These countries have relied on various mixes of agricultural intensification, land use zoning, forest protection, increased reliance on imported food and wood products, the creation of off-farm jobs, foreign capital investments, and remittances. Sound policies and innovations can therefore reconcile forest preservation with food production. Globalization can be harnessed to increase land use efficiency rather than leading to uncontrolled land use expansion. To do so, land systems should be understood and modeled as open systems with large flows of goods, people, and capital that connect local land use with global-scale factors.

摘要

可持续发展面临的一个核心挑战是,在提高粮食产量的同时,如何保护森林生态系统及其为我们提供的服务。发展中国家面临着经济全球化的挑战,经济全球化需要可利用耕地,这导致了森林砍伐。经济全球化放大了四种机制——位移效应、回弹效应、级联效应和汇款效应——从而加速了土地转换。少数发展中国家在最近几十年实现了土地利用的转变,同时增加了森林覆盖和农业产量。这些国家依靠农业集约化、土地用途分区、森林保护、增加对进口粮食和木材产品的依赖、创造非农就业机会、外国资本投资和汇款等各种组合。因此,健全的政策和创新可以协调森林保护和粮食生产。可以利用全球化来提高土地利用效率,而不是导致无控制的土地利用扩张。为此,土地系统应该被理解和建模为具有大量货物、人员和资本流动的开放系统,这些流动将本地土地利用与全球规模的因素联系起来。

相似文献

1
Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 1;108(9):3465-72. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1100480108. Epub 2011 Feb 14.
2
Forest transitions, trade, and the global displacement of land use.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Dec 7;107(49):20917-22. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014773107. Epub 2010 Nov 15.
3
Forests to fields. Restoring tropical lands to agriculture.
Land use policy. 1993 Apr;10(2):91-107. doi: 10.1016/0264-8377(93)90001-q.
4
Policies for reduced deforestation and their impact on agricultural production.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Nov 16;107(46):19639-44. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912014107. Epub 2010 Jul 19.
5
Forests or fields? A response to the theory that tropical forest conservation poses a threat to the poor.
Land use policy. 1993 Apr;10(2):108-21. doi: 10.1016/0264-8377(93)90002-r.
6
Differentiation and concordance in smallholder land use strategies in southern Mexico's conservation frontier.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Mar 30;107(13):5780-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905892107. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
7
Managing the world's forests.
Finance Dev. 1992 Jun;29(2):31-3.
8
Global economic trade-offs between wild nature and tropical agriculture.
PLoS Biol. 2017 Jul 21;15(7):e2001657. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2001657. eCollection 2017 Jul.
9
Pasture intensification is insufficient to relieve pressure on conservation priority areas in open agricultural markets.
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Jul;24(7):3199-3213. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14272. Epub 2018 May 4.
10
Combining global land cover datasets to quantify agricultural expansion into forests in Latin America: Limitations and challenges.
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 13;12(7):e0181202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181202. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring land cover change after prolonged droughts at the global level.
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 5;15(1):28520. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-14713-6.
4
Avoiding global deforestation by taxing land in agricultural production: the implications for global markets.
Carbon Balance Manag. 2025 Mar 13;20(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13021-025-00291-7.
6
Nonnegligible cascading impacts of global urban expansion on net primary productivity.
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Jun 4;4(1). doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae220. eCollection 2025 Jan.
8
Land use land cover change as a casual factor for climate variability and trends in the Bilate River Basin, Ethiopia.
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 31;19(12):e0311961. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311961. eCollection 2024.
9
From tradition to smart: A comprehensive review of the evolution and prospects of land use planning tools.
Heliyon. 2024 Nov 30;10(23):e40857. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40857. eCollection 2024 Dec 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Forest transitions, trade, and the global displacement of land use.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Dec 7;107(49):20917-22. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014773107. Epub 2010 Nov 15.
2
Trading carbon for food: global comparison of carbon stocks vs. crop yields on agricultural land.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Nov 16;107(46):19645-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011078107. Epub 2010 Nov 1.
3
Tropical forests were the primary sources of new agricultural land in the 1980s and 1990s.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Sep 21;107(38):16732-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910275107. Epub 2010 Aug 31.
4
Globalization's effects on world agricultural trade, 1960-2050.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Sep 27;365(1554):3007-21. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0131.
5
Policies for reduced deforestation and their impact on agricultural production.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Nov 16;107(46):19639-44. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912014107. Epub 2010 Jul 19.
6
Greenhouse gas mitigation by agricultural intensification.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jun 29;107(26):12052-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914216107. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
7
The agroecological matrix as alternative to the land-sparing/agriculture intensification model.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Mar 30;107(13):5786-91. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905455107. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
8
Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biofuels in Brazil.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Feb 23;107(8):3388-93. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907318107. Epub 2010 Feb 8.
9
Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people.
Science. 2010 Feb 12;327(5967):812-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1185383. Epub 2010 Jan 28.
10
Food security: contributions from science to a new and greener revolution.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Jan 12;365(1537):61-71. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0201.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验