Institute for Public Health of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Maršala Tita 9, Sarajevo 71000, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Sarajevo, Čekaluša 90, Sarajevo 71000, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Vaccine. 2020 Feb 18;38(8):1906-1914. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.01.025. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
Vaccination coverage in Bosnia and Herzegovina has been declining over recent years. A World Health Organization Tailoring Immunization Programmes (TIP) project is underway to gain insights into the underlying reasons for this, to develop tailored interventions. As part of TIP, this study aimed to investigate the views of health workers on their barriers and drivers to positive childhood vaccination practices.
Face-to-face qualitative interviews explored 38 health workers' views on vaccination coverage, their vaccination attitudes, and system, programme and institutional influences on their vaccination practices. The data were analysed using content analysis and organised by the COM (Capability, Opportunity and Motivation) factors.
Very few differences in barriers and drivers were evident between high and low coverage primary care centres or across different professional roles. Capability: Drivers included awareness of the risks of low vaccination coverage, regular use of the Rulebook and Order, knowledge of how to advise parents on mild side effects and recognition of the importance of good communication with parents. Key barriers were the use of false contraindications to postpone vacination and poor skills in tailoring communication with parents. Opportunity: Drivers were sufficient time for adminstering vaccination and good availability of vaccines. Several barriers were evident: lack of implementation of mandatory vaccination, no uniform recall and reminder system or system for detecting under-vaccinated children, staff shortages and lack of time to discuss vaccination with parents.
Drivers were a belief in the value, safety and effectiveness of vaccination and seeing that they have an important role to play. Barriers were a tendency to blame external factors e.g. anti-vax movement and a fear of being blamed for adverse events.
The study identified complex and inter-related barriers and drivers to health worker positive vaccination practices. These insights will now inform a process to identify and prioritize interventions.
近年来,波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那的疫苗接种率一直在下降。世界卫生组织正在开展一项量身定制免疫规划项目(TIP),以深入了解这一现象背后的原因,并制定有针对性的干预措施。作为 TIP 的一部分,本研究旨在调查卫生工作者对其积极开展儿童疫苗接种实践的障碍和推动因素的看法。
面对面的定性访谈探讨了 38 名卫生工作者对疫苗接种覆盖率、他们的疫苗接种态度以及系统、规划和机构对其疫苗接种实践的影响的看法。使用内容分析法对数据进行分析,并按 COM(能力、机会和动机)因素进行组织。
在高覆盖率和低覆盖率的初级保健中心之间,或在不同的专业角色之间,障碍和推动因素几乎没有差异。能力:推动因素包括对低疫苗接种率风险的认识、定期使用《规则手册和命令》、了解如何就轻微副作用向家长提供建议以及认识到与家长良好沟通的重要性。主要障碍是使用虚假禁忌症来推迟接种以及与家长沟通的技巧较差。机会:推动因素是管理疫苗接种的充足时间和良好的疫苗供应。存在一些障碍:强制接种的实施不足、没有统一的召回和提醒系统或发现未接种疫苗儿童的系统、人员短缺以及没有时间与家长讨论接种疫苗的问题。
推动因素是对疫苗接种的价值、安全性和有效性的信念,以及认为他们有重要作用。障碍是倾向于将责任归咎于外部因素,例如反疫苗运动,以及担心因不良事件而受到指责。
本研究确定了卫生工作者积极接种疫苗的复杂和相互关联的障碍和推动因素。这些见解将为确定和优先考虑干预措施提供信息。