• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Uncertainty in learning, choice, and visual fixation.学习、选择和视觉固视中的不确定性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Feb 11;117(6):3291-3300. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1911348117. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
2
Uncertainty-driven regulation of learning and exploration in adolescents: A computational account.不确定性驱动的青少年学习和探索的调节:一种计算解释。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Sep 30;16(9):e1008276. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008276. eCollection 2020 Sep.
3
Structured, uncertainty-driven exploration in real-world consumer choice.在现实消费者选择中进行结构化、不确定性驱动的探索。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jul 9;116(28):13903-13908. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1821028116. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
4
Observational learning of exploration-exploitation strategies in bandit tasks.强盗任务中探索-利用策略的观察性学习
Cognition. 2025 Jun;259:106124. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106124. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
5
Selective maintenance of value information helps resolve the exploration/exploitation dilemma.选择性地保留有价值的信息有助于解决探索/开发困境。
Cognition. 2019 Feb;183:226-243. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.11.004. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
6
How pupil responses track value-based decision-making during and after reinforcement learning.瞳孔反应如何在强化学习期间和之后跟踪基于价值的决策。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2018 Nov 30;14(11):e1006632. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006632. eCollection 2018 Nov.
7
The influence of depression symptoms on exploratory decision-making.抑郁症状对探索性决策的影响。
Cognition. 2013 Dec;129(3):563-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.08.018. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
8
Frontal theta reflects uncertainty and unexpectedness during exploration and exploitation.额部θ波反映了探索和开发过程中的不确定性和意外性。
Cereb Cortex. 2012 Nov;22(11):2575-86. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr332. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
9
Dorsal-Ventral Reinforcement Learning Network Connectivity and Incentive-Driven Changes in Exploration.背腹侧强化学习网络连接性与探索中动机驱动的变化
J Neurosci. 2025 Apr 9;45(15):e0422242025. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0422-24.2025.
10
Gaze Amplifies Value in Decision Making.凝视会增强决策中的价值。
Psychol Sci. 2019 Jan;30(1):116-128. doi: 10.1177/0956797618810521. Epub 2018 Dec 7.

引用本文的文献

1
The strength of confidence is involved in controlling the intensity of attentional allocation.信心的力量涉及到控制注意力分配的强度。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 21;15(1):2688. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86160-2.
2
Affect-congruent attention modulates generalized reward expectations.情绪一致性注意调节广义奖励预期。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Dec 21;19(12):e1011707. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011707. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Anxiety as a disorder of uncertainty: implications for understanding maladaptive anxiety, anxious avoidance, and exposure therapy.焦虑作为一种不确定性障碍:对理解适应不良性焦虑、焦虑回避和暴露疗法的启示。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2023 Jun;23(3):844-868. doi: 10.3758/s13415-023-01080-w. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
4
Time pressure changes how people explore and respond to uncertainty.时间压力改变了人们探索和应对不确定性的方式。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 8;12(1):4122. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07901-1.
5
Emergence of perceptuomotor relationships during paleolithic stone toolmaking learning: intersections of observation and practice.旧石器时代石器制造学习过程中感知运动关系的出现:观察与实践的交集。
Commun Biol. 2021 Nov 11;4(1):1278. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02768-w.
6
Fixation patterns in simple choice reflect optimal information sampling.简单选择中的注视模式反映了最优信息采样。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Mar 26;17(3):e1008863. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008863. eCollection 2021 Mar.
7
Human subjects exploit a cognitive map for credit assignment.人类主体利用认知图进行信用分配。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jan 26;118(4). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2016884118.

本文引用的文献

1
It's new, but is it good? How generalization and uncertainty guide the exploration of novel options.这是新的,但它好吗?概括和不确定性如何指导对新选项的探索。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Oct;149(10):1878-1907. doi: 10.1037/xge0000749. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
2
A computational account of threat-related attentional bias.威胁相关注意偏向的计算解释。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Oct 10;15(10):e1007341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007341. eCollection 2019 Oct.
3
The role of uncertainty in attentional and choice exploration.不确定性在注意力和选择探索中的作用。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Dec;26(6):1911-1916. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01653-2.
4
Confidence modulates exploration and exploitation in value-based learning.信心在基于价值的学习中调节探索与利用。
Neurosci Conscious. 2019 May 8;2019(1):niz004. doi: 10.1093/nc/niz004. eCollection 2019.
5
Deconstructing the human algorithms for exploration.解构人类的探索算法。
Cognition. 2018 Apr;173:34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.12.014. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
6
Putting bandits into context: How function learning supports decision making.将匪帮置于情境中:功能学习如何支持决策制定。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Jun;44(6):927-943. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000463. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
7
A causal role for right frontopolar cortex in directed, but not random, exploration.右侧额极在定向而非随机探索中起因果作用。
Elife. 2017 Sep 15;6:e27430. doi: 10.7554/eLife.27430.
8
Dynamic Interaction between Reinforcement Learning and Attention in Multidimensional Environments.多维环境中强化学习与注意力之间的动态交互
Neuron. 2017 Jan 18;93(2):451-463. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.040.
9
The drift diffusion model as the choice rule in reinforcement learning.强化学习中的选择规则——漂移扩散模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Aug;24(4):1234-1251. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1199-y.
10
Gaze data reveal distinct choice processes underlying model-based and model-free reinforcement learning.眼动数据揭示了基于模型和无模型强化学习的不同选择过程。
Nat Commun. 2016 Aug 11;7:12438. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12438.

学习、选择和视觉固视中的不确定性。

Uncertainty in learning, choice, and visual fixation.

机构信息

Max Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, University College London, London WC1B 5EH, United Kingdom;

Department of Management/MAPP, Aarhus University, Aarhus 8210, Denmark.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Feb 11;117(6):3291-3300. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1911348117. Epub 2020 Jan 24.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.1911348117
PMID:31980535
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7022187/
Abstract

Uncertainty plays a critical role in reinforcement learning and decision making. However, exactly how it influences behavior remains unclear. Multiarmed-bandit tasks offer an ideal test bed, since computational tools such as approximate Kalman filters can closely characterize the interplay between trial-by-trial values, uncertainty, learning, and choice. To gain additional insight into learning and choice processes, we obtained data from subjects' overt allocation of gaze. The estimated value and estimation uncertainty of options influenced what subjects looked at before choosing; these same quantities also influenced choice, as additionally did fixation itself. A momentary measure of uncertainty in the form of absolute prediction errors determined how long participants looked at the obtained outcomes. These findings affirm the importance of uncertainty in multiple facets of behavior and help delineate its effects on decision making.

摘要

不确定性在强化学习和决策中起着关键作用。然而,它究竟如何影响行为尚不清楚。多臂赌博机任务提供了一个理想的测试平台,因为近似卡尔曼滤波器等计算工具可以很好地描述试次间价值、不确定性、学习和选择之间的相互作用。为了更深入地了解学习和选择过程,我们从被试者的注视分配中获得了数据。选项的估计值和估计不确定性影响了被试者在选择前看什么;这些相同的量也影响了选择,因为注视本身也是如此。以绝对预测误差形式表示的瞬间不确定性衡量标准决定了参与者观察所获得结果的时间长短。这些发现肯定了不确定性在行为的多个方面的重要性,并帮助描绘了它对决策的影响。