• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

简单选择中的注视模式反映了最优信息采样。

Fixation patterns in simple choice reflect optimal information sampling.

作者信息

Callaway Frederick, Rangel Antonio, Griffiths Thomas L

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, United States of America.

Departments of Humanities and Social Sciences and Computation and Neural Systems, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Mar 26;17(3):e1008863. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008863. eCollection 2021 Mar.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008863
PMID:33770069
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8026028/
Abstract

Simple choices (e.g., eating an apple vs. an orange) are made by integrating noisy evidence that is sampled over time and influenced by visual attention; as a result, fluctuations in visual attention can affect choices. But what determines what is fixated and when? To address this question, we model the decision process for simple choice as an information sampling problem, and approximate the optimal sampling policy. We find that it is optimal to sample from options whose value estimates are both high and uncertain. Furthermore, the optimal policy provides a reasonable account of fixations and choices in binary and trinary simple choice, as well as the differences between the two cases. Overall, the results show that the fixation process during simple choice is influenced dynamically by the value estimates computed during the decision process, in a manner consistent with optimal information sampling.

摘要

简单的选择(例如,选择吃苹果还是橙子)是通过整合随时间采样并受视觉注意力影响的有噪声证据来做出的;因此,视觉注意力的波动会影响选择。但是,是什么决定了注视的对象和时间呢?为了解决这个问题,我们将简单选择的决策过程建模为一个信息采样问题,并近似最优采样策略。我们发现,从价值估计既高又不确定的选项中进行采样是最优的。此外,最优策略合理地解释了二元和三元简单选择中的注视和选择,以及两种情况之间的差异。总体而言,结果表明,简单选择过程中的注视过程受到决策过程中计算出的价值估计的动态影响,其方式与最优信息采样一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ac8/8026028/80d9f557272e/pcbi.1008863.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ac8/8026028/ab6968f5c61d/pcbi.1008863.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ac8/8026028/1875424eafb2/pcbi.1008863.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ac8/8026028/8eceab644af5/pcbi.1008863.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ac8/8026028/da0fc985071c/pcbi.1008863.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ac8/8026028/28bd2cad4789/pcbi.1008863.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ac8/8026028/fe1d74ed5416/pcbi.1008863.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ac8/8026028/80d9f557272e/pcbi.1008863.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ac8/8026028/ab6968f5c61d/pcbi.1008863.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ac8/8026028/1875424eafb2/pcbi.1008863.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ac8/8026028/8eceab644af5/pcbi.1008863.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ac8/8026028/da0fc985071c/pcbi.1008863.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ac8/8026028/28bd2cad4789/pcbi.1008863.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ac8/8026028/fe1d74ed5416/pcbi.1008863.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ac8/8026028/80d9f557272e/pcbi.1008863.g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Fixation patterns in simple choice reflect optimal information sampling.简单选择中的注视模式反映了最优信息采样。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Mar 26;17(3):e1008863. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008863. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
Visual fixations and the computation and comparison of value in simple choice.视觉注视与简单选择中的价值计算和比较。
Nat Neurosci. 2010 Oct;13(10):1292-8. doi: 10.1038/nn.2635. Epub 2010 Sep 12.
3
Multialternative drift-diffusion model predicts the relationship between visual fixations and choice in value-based decisions.多选项漂移扩散模型预测了基于价值的决策中视觉注视点与选择之间的关系。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Aug 16;108(33):13852-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1101328108. Epub 2011 Aug 1.
4
Optimal policy for attention-modulated decisions explains human fixation behavior.最优注意调节决策策略解释了人类的凝视行为。
Elife. 2021 Mar 26;10:e63436. doi: 10.7554/eLife.63436.
5
An attentional drift diffusion model over binary-attribute choice.二元属性选择的注意漂移扩散模型。
Cognition. 2017 Nov;168:34-45. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.007. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
6
Gaze bias differences capture individual choice behaviour.注视偏好差异可以捕捉个体的选择行为。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Jun;3(6):625-635. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0584-8. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
7
Visual fixation patterns during economic choice reflect covert valuation processes that emerge with learning.在经济选择过程中,视觉固视模式反映了随着学习而出现的隐性估值过程。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Nov 5;116(45):22795-22801. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1906662116. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
8
Peripheral Visual Information Halves Attentional Choice Biases.外周视觉信息对半分注意选择偏差。
Psychol Sci. 2023 Sep;34(9):984-998. doi: 10.1177/09567976231184878. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
9
Uncovering the computational mechanisms underlying many-alternative choice.揭示多选项选择背后的计算机制。
Elife. 2021 Apr 6;10:e57012. doi: 10.7554/eLife.57012.
10
Looking time predicts choice but not aesthetic value.注视时间预测选择,但不预测审美价值。
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 16;8(8):e71698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071698. eCollection 2013.

引用本文的文献

1
Considering What We Know and What We Don't Know: Expectations and Confidence Guide Value Integration in Value-Based Decision-Making.考量已知与未知:期望与信心引导基于价值的决策中的价值整合。
Open Mind (Camb). 2025 Jun 25;9:791-813. doi: 10.1162/opmi.a.3. eCollection 2025.
2
Value construction through sequential sampling explains serial dependencies in decision making.通过顺序采样进行价值构建解释了决策中的序列依赖性。
Elife. 2024 Dec 10;13:RP96997. doi: 10.7554/eLife.96997.
3
Value construction through sequential sampling explains serial dependencies in decision making.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimal Allocation of Finite Sampling Capacity in Accumulator Models of Multialternative Decision Making.多选择决策累积模型中有限抽样容量的最优分配。
Cogn Sci. 2022 May;46(5):e13143. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13143.
2
Mixing memory and desire: How memory reactivation supports deliberative decision-making.混合记忆与欲望:记忆再激活如何支持审慎决策。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2022 Mar;13(2):e1581. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1581. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
3
Optimal policy for attention-modulated decisions explains human fixation behavior.最优注意调节决策策略解释了人类的凝视行为。
通过顺序采样进行价值构建解释了决策中的序列依赖性。
bioRxiv. 2024 Oct 11:2024.01.13.575363. doi: 10.1101/2024.01.13.575363.
4
Hippocampal representations of alternative possibilities are flexibly generated to meet cognitive demands.海马体对替代可能性的表征会灵活生成以满足认知需求。
bioRxiv. 2024 Sep 23:2024.09.23.613567. doi: 10.1101/2024.09.23.613567.
5
Common neural choice signals can emerge artefactually amid multiple distinct value signals.常见的神经选择信号可以在多个不同的价值信号中人为地出现。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Nov;8(11):2194-2208. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01971-z. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
6
Humans reconfigure target and distractor processing to address distinct task demands.人类重新配置目标和干扰处理,以满足不同的任务需求。
Psychol Rev. 2024 Mar;131(2):349-372. doi: 10.1037/rev0000442. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
7
Learning how to reason and deciding when to decide.学习推理和决定何时决策。
Behav Brain Sci. 2023 Jul 18;46:e115. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X22003090.
8
The developmental trajectory of object recognition robustness: Children are like small adults but unlike big deep neural networks.客体识别稳健性的发展轨迹:儿童似小大人而非大深度神经网络。
J Vis. 2023 Jul 3;23(7):4. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.7.4.
9
Complex economic decisions from simple neurocognitive processes: the role of interactive attention.复杂的经济决策源于简单的神经认知过程:互动注意的作用。
Proc Biol Sci. 2023 Feb 8;290(1992):20221593. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.1593.
10
Phantom controllers: Misspecified models create the false appearance of adaptive control during value-based choice.虚幻控制器:错误指定的模型在基于价值的选择过程中制造出自适应控制的假象。
bioRxiv. 2025 Apr 14:2023.01.18.524640. doi: 10.1101/2023.01.18.524640.
Elife. 2021 Mar 26;10:e63436. doi: 10.7554/eLife.63436.
4
Unbiased and efficient log-likelihood estimation with inverse binomial sampling.基于逆二项抽样的无偏和高效对数似然估计。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Dec 23;16(12):e1008483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008483. eCollection 2020 Dec.
5
Visual attention modulates the integration of goal-relevant evidence and not value.视觉注意力调节与目标相关的证据的整合,而不是价值。
Elife. 2020 Nov 17;9:e60705. doi: 10.7554/eLife.60705.
6
Heuristics and optimal solutions to the breadth-depth dilemma.启发式方法和广度-深度困境的最优解决方案。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Aug 18;117(33):19799-19808. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2004929117. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
7
What Are Memories For? The Hippocampus Bridges Past Experience with Future Decisions.记忆为何物?海马体将过去的经验与未来的决策联系起来。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Jul;24(7):542-556. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.04.004. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
8
Dopamine promotes cognitive effort by biasing the benefits versus costs of cognitive work.多巴胺通过使认知工作的收益与成本产生偏差来促进认知努力。
Science. 2020 Mar 20;367(6484):1362-1366. doi: 10.1126/science.aaz5891.
9
Value-based attention but not divisive normalization influences decisions with multiple alternatives.基于价值的注意力而非分歧归一化影响具有多个备选方案的决策。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Jun;4(6):634-645. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0822-0. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
10
Uncertainty in learning, choice, and visual fixation.学习、选择和视觉固视中的不确定性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Feb 11;117(6):3291-3300. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1911348117. Epub 2020 Jan 24.