Leong Yuan Chang, Radulescu Angela, Daniel Reka, DeWoskin Vivian, Niv Yael
Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
Neuron. 2017 Jan 18;93(2):451-463. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.040.
Little is known about the relationship between attention and learning during decision making. Using eye tracking and multivariate pattern analysis of fMRI data, we measured participants' dimensional attention as they performed a trial-and-error learning task in which only one of three stimulus dimensions was relevant for reward at any given time. Analysis of participants' choices revealed that attention biased both value computation during choice and value update during learning. Value signals in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and prediction errors in the striatum were similarly biased by attention. In turn, participants' focus of attention was dynamically modulated by ongoing learning. Attentional switches across dimensions correlated with activity in a frontoparietal attention network, which showed enhanced connectivity with the ventromedial prefrontal cortex between switches. Our results suggest a bidirectional interaction between attention and learning: attention constrains learning to relevant dimensions of the environment, while we learn what to attend to via trial and error.
关于决策过程中注意力与学习之间的关系,我们所知甚少。我们使用眼动追踪和功能磁共振成像(fMRI)数据的多变量模式分析,测量了参与者在执行试错学习任务时的维度注意力,在该任务中,在任何给定时间,三个刺激维度中只有一个与奖励相关。对参与者选择的分析表明,注意力在选择过程中的价值计算和学习过程中的价值更新方面都存在偏差。腹内侧前额叶皮层中的价值信号和纹状体中的预测误差同样受到注意力的影响。反过来,参与者的注意力焦点会受到持续学习的动态调节。维度间的注意力切换与额顶叶注意力网络的活动相关,该网络在切换之间与腹内侧前额叶皮层的连接增强。我们的结果表明注意力与学习之间存在双向交互作用:注意力将学习限制在环境的相关维度上,而我们通过试错学习应该关注什么。