Department of Psychology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC, Roanoke, VA, USA.
J Youth Adolesc. 2020 Jul;49(7):1545-1557. doi: 10.1007/s10964-020-01193-2. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
Although theoretical work proposes that emotion regulation development exhibits a positive growth trajectory across adolescence as prefrontal brain regions continue to mature, individual differences in developmental changes of emotion regulation merit elucidation. The present study investigates longitudinal links between the family environment (i.e., socioeconomic risk and family emotional context) and emotion regulation development. The sample included 167 adolescents (53% males) who were first recruited at 13-14 years of age and assessed annually four times. Latent change score analyses identified family emotional context as a mediator between socioeconomic risk and emotion regulation development, such that lower socioeconomic risk (higher socioeconomic status and lower household chaos) at Time 1 was associated with a more positive family emotional context (parent emotion regulation, parenting practices, and parent-adolescent relationship quality), which in turn was associated with larger year-to-year increases in emotion regulation. The findings highlight the important role of the family emotional context as a process explaining how the challenges of growing up in a household laden with socioeconomic risk may be associated with emotion regulation development during adolescence.
虽然理论工作提出,随着前额叶大脑区域继续成熟,情绪调节发展呈现出积极的增长轨迹,但情绪调节发展的个体差异值得阐明。本研究调查了家庭环境(即社会经济风险和家庭情绪环境)与情绪调节发展之间的纵向联系。该样本包括 167 名青少年(53%为男性),他们在 13-14 岁时首次被招募,并每年评估四次。潜在变化分数分析确定家庭情绪环境是社会经济风险和情绪调节发展之间的中介,即 1 时间点的社会经济风险较低(社会经济地位较高,家庭混乱程度较低)与家庭情绪环境更为积极(父母情绪调节、教养实践和亲子关系质量)相关,这反过来又与情绪调节的年增长率更大相关。研究结果强调了家庭情绪环境作为一个解释过程的重要作用,该过程解释了在一个充满社会经济风险的家庭中成长的挑战如何与青少年时期的情绪调节发展相关。