• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

What Is the Best Mix of Population-Wide and High-Risk Targeted Strategies of Primary Stroke and Cardiovascular Disease Prevention?

作者信息

Feigin Valery L, Brainin Michael, Norrving Bo, Gorelick Philip B, Dichgans Martin, Wang Wenzhi, Pandian Jeyaraj Durai, Martins Sheila Cristina Ouriques, Owolabi Mayowa O, Wood David A, Hankey Graeme J

机构信息

National Institute for Stroke and Applied Neurosciences School of Public Health and Psychosocial Studies Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences AUT University Auckland New Zealand.

Department of Neuroscience and Preventive Medicine President of the World Stroke Organization Danube University Krems Austria.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Feb 4;9(3):e014494. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014494. Epub 2020 Jan 25.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.119.014494
PMID:31983323
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7033901/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cf7/7033901/ce666a351f7d/JAH3-9-e014494-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cf7/7033901/ce666a351f7d/JAH3-9-e014494-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8cf7/7033901/ce666a351f7d/JAH3-9-e014494-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
What Is the Best Mix of Population-Wide and High-Risk Targeted Strategies of Primary Stroke and Cardiovascular Disease Prevention?原发性中风和心血管疾病预防的全人群策略与高危人群针对性策略的最佳组合是什么？
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Feb 4;9(3):e014494. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014494. Epub 2020 Jan 25.
2
Predicting the impact of population level risk reduction in cardio-vascular disease and stroke on acute hospital admission rates over a 5 year period--a pilot study.预测5年内心血管疾病和中风的人群水平风险降低对急性住院率的影响——一项试点研究。
Public Health. 2006 Dec;120(12):1140-8. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2006.10.012. Epub 2006 Nov 3.
3
Identification of effective screening strategies for cardiovascular disease prevention in a developing country: using cardiovascular risk-estimation and risk-reduction tools for policy recommendations.在发展中国家确定有效的心血管疾病预防筛查策略：利用心血管风险评估和降低风险工具制定政策建议。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2013 Feb 25;13:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-13-10.
4
Cases in Precision Medicine: A Personalized Approach to Stroke and Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Women.精准医学案例：女性中风和心血管风险评估的个性化方法。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Dec 3;171(11):837-842. doi: 10.7326/M19-1601. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
5
Prevention of cardiovascular disease and stroke: meeting the challenge.心血管疾病和中风的预防：应对挑战
JAMA. 2011 Nov 16;306(19):2147-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1668.
6
[Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease should be based on absolute risk assessment].
Lakartidningen. 2005;102(7):496-7.
7
The role of legislators in the prevention of heart disease and stroke.立法者在预防心脏病和中风方面的作用。
N C Med J. 2012 Nov-Dec;73(6):466-8.
8
The hypertension initiative of South Carolina. Promoting cardiovascular health through better blood pressure control.南卡罗来纳州高血压防治计划。通过更好地控制血压促进心血管健康。
J S C Med Assoc. 2001 Feb;97(2):57-62.
9
A systematic review on the application of cardiovascular risk prediction models in pharmacoeconomics, with a focus on primary prevention.系统评价心血管风险预测模型在药物经济学中的应用，重点关注初级预防。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012 Aug;19(2 Suppl):42-53. doi: 10.1177/2047487312448994.
10
Health and Economic Implications of National Treatment Coverage for Cardiovascular Disease in India: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.印度全国心血管疾病治疗覆盖范围的健康和经济影响：成本效益分析
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Nov;8(6):541-51. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.001994. Epub 2015 Nov 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Highlights from the Manifesto on the Health Economics of Cardiovascular Disease Prevention.《心血管疾病预防健康经济学宣言》要点
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 Sep 8. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01537-5.
2
Factors associated with stroke recurrence and mortality in ischemic and haemorrhagic stroke: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.缺血性和出血性卒中复发及死亡的相关因素：系统评价与荟萃分析方案
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 14;20(8):e0329932. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329932. eCollection 2025.
3
Current and Future Cost Burden of Myocardial Infarction in Australia: Dynamic Multistate Markov Model.

本文引用的文献

1
Machine Learning to Predict the Likelihood of Acute Myocardial Infarction.机器学习预测急性心肌梗死的可能性
Circulation. 2019 Sep 10;140(11):899-909. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.041980. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
2
Priorities to reduce the burden of stroke in Latin American countries.减少拉丁美洲国家中风负担的重点。
Lancet Neurol. 2019 Jul;18(7):674-683. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30068-7. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
3
Potential impact of a modest reduction in salt intake on blood pressure, cardiovascular disease burden and premature mortality: a modelling study.
澳大利亚心肌梗死当前及未来的成本负担：动态多状态马尔可夫模型
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Mar 4. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09423-8.
4
Cardiovascular disease in the Americas: the epidemiology of cardiovascular disease and its risk factors.美洲的心血管疾病：心血管疾病及其风险因素的流行病学
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2025 Feb 14;42:100960. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100960. eCollection 2025 Feb.
5
Long-Term Physical Exercise for Preventing CKD in Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial.长期体育锻炼预防老年人慢性肾脏病：一项随机对照试验。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2025 Feb 4;36(7):1352-62. doi: 10.1681/ASN.0000000636.
6
Stroke in Brazil: prevalence, activity limitations, access to healthcare, and physiotherapeutic treatment.巴西的中风：患病率、活动受限情况、医疗保健可及性及物理治疗
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2024 Dec;82(12):1-11. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1792094. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
7
Can we stop the stroke tsunami? Mitigating the barriers, amplifying the facilitators.我们能阻止中风海啸吗？减少障碍，增强促进因素。
J R Soc N Z. 2020 Aug 4;52(2):109-128. doi: 10.1080/03036758.2020.1798477. eCollection 2022.
8
Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.全球、区域和国家的卒中负担及其风险因素，1990-2021 年：2021 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet Neurol. 2024 Oct;23(10):973-1003. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00369-7.
9
Population-wide impact of a pragmatic program to identify and manage individuals at high-risk of cardiovascular disease: a cluster randomized trial in 120 villages from Northern China.一项识别和管理心血管疾病高危个体的实用项目对全人群的影响：中国北方120个村庄的整群随机试验
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 May 24;11:1372298. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1372298. eCollection 2024.
10
Future Burden of Ischemic Stroke in Australia: Impact on Health Outcomes between 2019 and 2038.澳大利亚缺血性中风的未来负担：2019年至2038年对健康结果的影响
Neuroepidemiology. 2024;58(6):449-459. doi: 10.1159/000538800. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
适量减少盐摄入量对血压、心血管疾病负担和过早死亡的潜在影响：建模研究。
Open Heart. 2019 Feb 14;6(1):e000943. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000943. eCollection 2019.
4
New hypertension guidance risks overdiagnosis and overtreatment.新的高血压指南存在过度诊断和过度治疗的风险。
BMJ. 2019 Apr 12;365:l1657. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1657.
5
Machine Learning in Medicine.医学中的机器学习
N Engl J Med. 2019 Apr 4;380(14):1347-1358. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1814259.
6
2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2019 ACC/AHA 心血管疾病一级预防指南：执行摘要：美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组的报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Sep 10;74(10):1376-1414. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.009. Epub 2019 Mar 17.
7
2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2019美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会心血管疾病一级预防指南：美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告
Circulation. 2019 Sep 10;140(11):e596-e646. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000678. Epub 2019 Mar 17.
8
Stroke in China: advances and challenges in epidemiology, prevention, and management.中国脑卒中：流行病学、预防和管理方面的进展与挑战。
Lancet Neurol. 2019 Apr;18(4):394-405. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30500-3.
9
Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016.全球、区域和国家卒中负担，1990-2016 年：2016 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet Neurol. 2019 May;18(5):439-458. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30034-1. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
10
A systematic review shows no performance benefit of machine learning over logistic regression for clinical prediction models.系统评价显示，机器学习在临床预测模型中并未优于逻辑回归。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jun;110:12-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Feb 11.