Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Leopoldstraße 13, 80802, Munich, Germany.
Psychol Res. 2023 Jul;87(5):1616-1631. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01746-z. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
Trauma-focused imagery-based interventions are suspected to alter or even distort declarative voluntary memory of a traumatic event, especially if they involve the active modification of imagery, e.g., as used in imagery rescripting (ImRs). However, systematic research is lacking so far. To investigate whether ImRs modifies voluntary memory of a standardized autobiographical aversive event (Trier Social Stress Test) (Session 1), healthy participants (N = 100) were randomly assigned to either an intervention condition receiving one session of ImRs or to a no-intervention control condition (NIC) (Session 2). Voluntary memory was examined using a free recall (Sessions 2 and 3) and a cued recall (Sessions 3 and 4). Although voluntary memory tended to deteriorate over time, contrary to expectations, this effect was not associated with ImRs. Remarkably, the number of correct details in free recall even improved in ImRs but not in NIC. This challenges the view that ImRs alters voluntary memory.
创伤焦点意象干预被怀疑会改变甚至扭曲对创伤事件的陈述性自愿记忆,特别是如果它们涉及对意象的主动修改,例如在意象重写(ImRs)中。然而,到目前为止,系统的研究还很缺乏。为了研究意象重写是否会修改对标准化自传体厌恶事件(特里尔社会应激测试)(第 1 次会话)的自愿记忆,健康参与者(N=100)被随机分配到接受一次意象重写干预的干预组或无干预对照组(第 2 次会话)。使用自由回忆(第 2 次和第 3 次会话)和提示回忆(第 3 次和第 4 次会话)来检查自愿记忆。尽管自愿记忆随着时间的推移而恶化,但出乎意料的是,这种效应与意象重写无关。值得注意的是,在自由回忆中正确的细节数量甚至在 ImRs 中有所提高,而在 NIC 中则没有。这对意象重写改变自愿记忆的观点提出了挑战。