精神病理学中是什么驱动了错误记忆?关联激活的一个例证。

What Drives False Memories in Psychopathology? A Case for Associative Activation.

作者信息

Otgaar Henry, Muris Peter, Howe Mark L, Merckelbach Harald

机构信息

Maastricht University.

City, University of London.

出版信息

Clin Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;5(6):1048-1069. doi: 10.1177/2167702617724424. Epub 2017 Sep 19.

Abstract

In clinical and court settings, it is imperative to know whether posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression may make people susceptible to false memories. We conducted a review of the literature on false memory effects in participants with PTSD, a history of trauma, or depression. When emotional associative material was presented to these groups, their levels of false memory were raised relative to those in relevant comparison groups. This difference did not consistently emerge when neutral or nonassociative material was presented. Our conclusion is supported by a quantitative comparison of effect sizes between studies using emotional associative or neutral, nonassociative material. Our review suggests that individuals with PTSD, a history of trauma, or depression are at risk for producing false memories when they are exposed to information that is related to their knowledge base.

摘要

在临床和法庭环境中,了解创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和抑郁症是否会使人易产生错误记忆至关重要。我们对有关PTSD患者、有创伤史者或抑郁症患者错误记忆效应的文献进行了综述。当向这些群体呈现情感关联材料时,他们的错误记忆水平相对于相关对照组有所提高。当呈现中性或非关联材料时,这种差异并不一致出现。我们的结论得到了使用情感关联或中性、非关联材料的研究之间效应大小定量比较的支持。我们的综述表明,患有PTSD、有创伤史或抑郁症的个体在接触与其知识库相关的信息时,有产生错误记忆的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c127/5665161/4e51cfa0da3b/10.1177_2167702617724424-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索