• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脓毒症监测:参数敏感性与警报可靠性的检验

Sepsis surveillance: an examination of parameter sensitivity and alert reliability.

作者信息

Amland Robert C, Burghart Mark, Overhage J Marc

机构信息

Population Health, Cerner Corporation, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

JAMIA Open. 2019 Jun 11;2(3):339-345. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz014. eCollection 2019 Oct.

DOI:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz014
PMID:31984366
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6951868/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine performance of a sepsis surveillance system in a simulated environment where modifications to parameters and settings for identification of at-risk patients can be explored in-depth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a multiple center observational cohort study. The study population comprised 14 917 adults hospitalized in 2016. An expert-driven rules algorithm was applied against 15.1 million data points to simulate a system with binary notification of sepsis events. Three system scenarios were examined: a scenario as derived from the second version of the Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (SEP-2), the same scenario but without systolic blood pressure (SBP) decrease criteria (near SEP-2), and a conservative scenario with limited parameters. Patients identified by scenarios as being at-risk for sepsis were assessed for suspected infection. Multivariate binary logistic regression models estimated mortality risk among patients with suspected infection.

RESULTS

First, the SEP-2-based scenario had a hyperactive, unreliable parameter SBP decrease >40 mm Hg from baseline. Second, the near SEP-2 scenario demonstrated adequate reliability and sensitivity. Third, the conservative scenario had modestly higher reliability, but sensitivity degraded quickly. Parameters differed in predicting mortality risk and represented a substitution effect between scenarios.

DISCUSSION

Configuration of parameters and alert criteria have implications for patient identification and predicted outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Performance of scenarios was associated with scenario design. A single hyperactive, unreliable parameter may negatively influence adoption of the system. A trade-off between modest improvements in alert reliability corresponded to a steep decline in condition sensitivity in scenarios explored.

摘要

目的

在模拟环境中检验脓毒症监测系统的性能,以便深入探究对识别高危患者的参数和设置进行修改的情况。

材料与方法

这是一项多中心观察性队列研究。研究人群包括2016年住院的14917名成年人。采用专家驱动的规则算法,针对1510万个数据点模拟一个脓毒症事件二元通知系统。研究了三种系统场景:源自脓毒症和脓毒性休克共识定义第二版(SEP-2)的场景、相同场景但无收缩压(SBP)下降标准(接近SEP-2)的场景以及参数有限的保守场景。对各场景识别出的脓毒症高危患者进行疑似感染评估。多变量二元逻辑回归模型估计疑似感染患者的死亡风险。

结果

首先,基于SEP-2的场景有一个过度活跃、不可靠的参数,即SBP较基线下降>40 mmHg。其次,接近SEP-2的场景显示出足够的可靠性和敏感性。第三,保守场景的可靠性略高,但敏感性迅速下降。各参数在预测死亡风险方面存在差异,且在不同场景间呈现替代效应。

讨论

参数配置和警报标准对患者识别及预测结果有影响。

结论

各场景的性能与场景设计相关。一个过度活跃、不可靠的单一参数可能对系统的采用产生负面影响。在所探究的场景中,警报可靠性的适度提高与病情敏感性的急剧下降之间存在权衡。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a625/6951868/6e570a6093e8/ooz014f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a625/6951868/84928b6df77e/ooz014f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a625/6951868/6e570a6093e8/ooz014f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a625/6951868/84928b6df77e/ooz014f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a625/6951868/6e570a6093e8/ooz014f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Sepsis surveillance: an examination of parameter sensitivity and alert reliability.脓毒症监测:参数敏感性与警报可靠性的检验
JAMIA Open. 2019 Jun 11;2(3):339-345. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz014. eCollection 2019 Oct.
2
An Emergency Department Validation of the SEP-3 Sepsis and Septic Shock Definitions and Comparison With 1992 Consensus Definitions.急诊科对SEP-3脓毒症和脓毒性休克定义的验证及与1992年共识定义的比较
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;70(4):544-552.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.01.008. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
3
Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).脓毒症临床标准评估:针对《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义》(Sepsis-3)。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):762-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288.
4
Developing a New Definition and Assessing New Clinical Criteria for Septic Shock: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).制定脓毒性休克的新定义并评估新的临床标准:用于第三次脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际共识定义(Sepsis-3)。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):775-87. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0289.
5
Association Between Implementation of the Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Management Bundle Performance Measure and Outcomes in Patients With Suspected Sepsis in US Hospitals.严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克早期管理捆绑包实施与美国医院疑似脓毒症患者结局的相关性研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2138596. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.38596.
6
A Machine Learning Algorithm to Predict Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: Development, Implementation, and Impact on Clinical Practice.一种用于预测严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的机器学习算法:开发、实施及其对临床实践的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Nov;47(11):1485-1492. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003891.
7
Sepsis Care Pathway 2019.2019年脓毒症护理路径
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):4. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.4. eCollection 2019.
8
Implementation and evaluation of sepsis surveillance and decision support in medical ICU and emergency department.医疗重症监护病房和急诊科脓毒症监测与决策支持的实施与评估
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Jan;51:378-383. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.09.086. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
9
A two-stage clinical decision support system for early recognition and stratification of patients with sepsis: an observational cohort study.一种用于早期识别和分层脓毒症患者的两阶段临床决策支持系统:一项观察性队列研究。
JRSM Open. 2015 Oct 8;6(10):2054270415609004. doi: 10.1177/2054270415609004. eCollection 2015 Oct.
10
Potential Impact of the 2016 Consensus Definitions of Sepsis and Septic Shock on Future Sepsis Research.2016年脓毒症及脓毒性休克共识定义对未来脓毒症研究的潜在影响。
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;70(4):553-561.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.04.007.

本文引用的文献

1
An investigation of sepsis surveillance and emergency treatment on patient mortality outcomes: An observational cohort study.脓毒症监测与急诊治疗对患者死亡率影响的调查:一项观察性队列研究。
JAMIA Open. 2018 May 15;1(1):107-114. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooy013. eCollection 2018 Jul.
2
Association of septic shock definitions and standardized mortality ratio in a contemporary cohort of critically ill patients.严重感染患者当代队列中脓毒症休克定义与标准化死亡率比的相关性研究。
J Crit Care. 2019 Apr;50:269-274. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.01.005. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
3
Not all organ dysfunctions are created equal - Prevalence and mortality in sepsis.
并非所有器官功能障碍都是平等的——脓毒症中的患病率和死亡率。
J Crit Care. 2018 Dec;48:257-262. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.08.021. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
4
Mortality Changes Associated with Mandated Public Reporting for Sepsis. The Results of the New York State Initiative.与脓毒症强制公共报告相关的死亡率变化。纽约州倡议的结果。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Dec 1;198(11):1406-1412. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201712-2545OC.
5
Prognostic Accuracy of the Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment for Mortality in Patients With Suspected Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.快速序贯器官衰竭评估对疑似感染患者死亡率的预后准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Feb 20;168(4):266-275. doi: 10.7326/M17-2820. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
6
An Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Accurate Prediction of Sepsis in the ICU.一种用于 ICU 中脓毒症准确预测的可解释机器学习模型。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr;46(4):547-553. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002936.
7
Impact of an emergency department electronic sepsis surveillance system on patient mortality and length of stay.急诊电子脓毒症监测系统对患者死亡率和住院时间的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 May 1;25(5):523-529. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx072.
8
The Intricacies of User Adjustments of Alerting Thresholds.用户对警报阈值调整的复杂性。
Hum Factors. 2017 Sep;59(6):901-910. doi: 10.1177/0018720817698616. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
9
Screening for sepsis in general hospitalized patients: a systematic review.普通住院患者的脓毒症筛查:一项系统评价
J Hosp Infect. 2017 Aug;96(4):305-315. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 May 12.
10
Secondary Analysis of an Electronic Surveillance System Combined with Multi-focal Interventions for Early Detection of Sepsis.结合多焦点干预措施的电子监测系统用于脓毒症早期检测的二次分析
Appl Clin Inform. 2017 Jan 18;8(1):47-66. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2016-07-RA-0112.