• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脓毒症监测与急诊治疗对患者死亡率影响的调查:一项观察性队列研究。

An investigation of sepsis surveillance and emergency treatment on patient mortality outcomes: An observational cohort study.

作者信息

Amland Robert C, Sutariya Bharat B

机构信息

Population Health, Cerner Corporation, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.

出版信息

JAMIA Open. 2018 May 15;1(1):107-114. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooy013. eCollection 2018 Jul.

DOI:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooy013
PMID:31984322
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6951936/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of initiating the sepsis 3-h bundle of care and estimate effects of bundle completion on risk-adjusted mortality among emergency department (ED) patients screened-in by electronic surveillance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a multiple center observational cohort study conducted in 2016. The study population was comprised of patients screened-in by St. John Sepsis Surveillance Agent within 4 h of ED arrival, had a sepsis bundle initiated, and admitted to hospital. We built multivariable logistic regression models to estimate impact of a 3-h bundle completed within 3 h of arrival on mortality outcomes.

RESULTS

Approximately 3% ED patients were screened-in by electronic surveillance within 4 h of arrival and admitted to hospital. Nearly 7 in 10 (69%) patients had a bundle initiated, with most bundles completed within 3 h of arrival. The fully-adjusted risk model achieved good discrimination on mortality outcomes [area under the receiver operating characteristic 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79-0.85] and estimated 34% reduced mortality risk among patients with a bundle completed within 3 h of arrival compared to non-completers.

DISCUSSION

The sepsis bundle is an effective intervention for many vulnerable patients, and likely to be completed within 3 h after arrival when electronic surveillance with reliable alert notifications are integrated into clinical workflow. Beginning at triage, the platform and sepsis program enables identification and management of patients with greater precision, and increases the odds of good outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Sepsis surveillance and clinical decision support accelerate accurate recognition and stratification of patients, and facilitate timely delivery of health care.

摘要

目的

确定启动脓毒症3小时集束化治疗的发生率,并评估集束化治疗完成对通过电子监测筛查入急诊科(ED)患者的风险调整死亡率的影响。

材料与方法

这是一项于2016年进行的多中心观察性队列研究。研究人群包括在到达ED后4小时内被圣约翰脓毒症监测代理筛查入、启动了脓毒症集束化治疗并入院的患者。我们构建了多变量逻辑回归模型,以估计在到达后3小时内完成3小时集束化治疗对死亡率结局的影响。

结果

约3%的ED患者在到达后4小时内通过电子监测筛查入并入院。近十分之七(69%)的患者启动了集束化治疗,大多数集束化治疗在到达后3小时内完成。完全调整后的风险模型在死亡率结局方面具有良好的区分度[受试者操作特征曲线下面积为0.82,95%置信区间(CI)为0.79 - 0.85],并估计与未完成集束化治疗的患者相比,在到达后3小时内完成集束化治疗的患者死亡率风险降低34%。

讨论

脓毒症集束化治疗对许多脆弱患者是一种有效的干预措施,当将具有可靠警报通知的电子监测整合到临床工作流程中时,很可能在到达后三小时内完成。从分诊开始,该平台和脓毒症项目能够更精确地识别和管理患者,并增加良好结局的几率。

结论

脓毒症监测和临床决策支持可加速对患者的准确识别和分层,并促进及时提供医疗保健。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e250/6951936/f6d47d964ac5/ooy013f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e250/6951936/3c12a5bed12f/ooy013f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e250/6951936/f6d47d964ac5/ooy013f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e250/6951936/3c12a5bed12f/ooy013f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e250/6951936/f6d47d964ac5/ooy013f2.jpg

相似文献

1
An investigation of sepsis surveillance and emergency treatment on patient mortality outcomes: An observational cohort study.脓毒症监测与急诊治疗对患者死亡率影响的调查:一项观察性队列研究。
JAMIA Open. 2018 May 15;1(1):107-114. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooy013. eCollection 2018 Jul.
2
Sepsis Care Pathway 2019.2019年脓毒症护理路径
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):4. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.4. eCollection 2019.
3
Poor performance of quick-SOFA (qSOFA) score in predicting severe sepsis and mortality - a prospective study of patients admitted with infection to the emergency department.快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分在预测严重脓毒症及死亡率方面表现不佳——一项针对急诊科收治的感染患者的前瞻性研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Jun 9;25(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0399-4.
4
Implementation and evaluation of sepsis surveillance and decision support in medical ICU and emergency department.医疗重症监护病房和急诊科脓毒症监测与决策支持的实施与评估
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Jan;51:378-383. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.09.086. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
5
Relationship between time of emergency department admission and adherence to the Surviving Sepsis Campaign bundle in patients with septic shock.急诊就诊时间与脓毒性休克患者遵守拯救脓毒症运动捆绑治疗的关系。
Crit Care. 2022 Feb 11;26(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-03899-0.
6
A quality improvement project to improve early sepsis care in the emergency department.一项旨在改善急诊科早期脓毒症护理的质量改进项目。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Dec;24(12):787-95. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003552. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
7
Association Between the New York Sepsis Care Mandate and In-Hospital Mortality for Pediatric Sepsis.纽约脓毒症护理指令与儿科脓毒症院内死亡率的关联
JAMA. 2018 Jul 24;320(4):358-367. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.9071.
8
Hour-1 bundle adherence was associated with reduction of in-hospital mortality among patients with sepsis in Japan.在日本,1 小时捆绑治疗依从性与脓毒症患者院内死亡率的降低相关。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 14;17(2):e0263936. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263936. eCollection 2022.
9
Time to Treatment and Mortality during Mandated Emergency Care for Sepsis.脓毒症强制紧急治疗的治疗时间与死亡率
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 8;376(23):2235-2244. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1703058. Epub 2017 May 21.
10
Sex-based differences in ED management of critically ill patients with sepsis: a nationwide cohort study.基于性别的脓毒症危重症患者 ED 管理差异:一项全国性队列研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Apr;46(4):727-736. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05910-9. Epub 2020 Jan 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems for the Early Detection of Sepsis Among Adult Inpatients: Scoping Review.计算机化临床决策支持系统用于早期检测成年住院患者脓毒症:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 23;24(2):e31083. doi: 10.2196/31083.
2
Sepsis surveillance: an examination of parameter sensitivity and alert reliability.脓毒症监测:参数敏感性与警报可靠性的检验
JAMIA Open. 2019 Jun 11;2(3):339-345. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz014. eCollection 2019 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic Accuracy of the Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment for Mortality in Patients With Suspected Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.快速序贯器官衰竭评估对疑似感染患者死亡率的预后准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Feb 20;168(4):266-275. doi: 10.7326/M17-2820. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
2
Early Warning Scores do not accurately predict mortality in sepsis: A meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature.早期预警评分不能准确预测脓毒症患者的死亡率:文献的荟萃分析和系统评价。
J Infect. 2018 Mar;76(3):241-248. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2018.01.002. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
3
Impact of an emergency department electronic sepsis surveillance system on patient mortality and length of stay.
急诊电子脓毒症监测系统对患者死亡率和住院时间的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 May 1;25(5):523-529. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx072.
4
Incidence and Trends of Sepsis in US Hospitals Using Clinical vs Claims Data, 2009-2014.2009 - 2014年美国医院中使用临床数据与索赔数据的脓毒症发病率及趋势
JAMA. 2017 Oct 3;318(13):1241-1249. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.13836.
5
Quick Sequential [Sepsis-Related] Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) and St. John Sepsis Surveillance Agent to Detect Patients at Risk of Sepsis: An Observational Cohort Study.快速序贯[脓毒症相关]器官功能衰竭评估(qSOFA)及圣约翰脓毒症监测工具对脓毒症风险患者的检测:一项观察性队列研究
Am J Med Qual. 2018 Jan/Feb;33(1):50-57. doi: 10.1177/1062860617692034. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
6
Time to Treatment and Mortality during Mandated Emergency Care for Sepsis.脓毒症强制紧急治疗的治疗时间与死亡率
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 8;376(23):2235-2244. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1703058. Epub 2017 May 21.
7
The Timing of Early Antibiotics and Hospital Mortality in Sepsis.脓毒症中早期使用抗生素的时机与医院死亡率
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Oct 1;196(7):856-863. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201609-1848OC.
8
The impact of ED crowding on early interventions and mortality in patients with severe sepsis.急诊拥挤对严重脓毒症患者早期干预及死亡率的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Jul;35(7):953-960. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.01.061. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
9
Early sepsis bundle compliance for non-hypotensive patients with intermediate versus severe hyperlactemia.非低血压性中度与重度高乳酸血症患者早期脓毒症集束化治疗的依从性
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Jun;35(6):811-818. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.01.029. Epub 2017 Jan 15.
10
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016.拯救脓毒症运动:脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理国际指南:2016 年版。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Mar;43(3):304-377. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6. Epub 2017 Jan 18.