• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于 ICU 中脓毒症准确预测的可解释机器学习模型。

An Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Accurate Prediction of Sepsis in the ICU.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr;46(4):547-553. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002936.

DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000002936
PMID:29286945
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5851825/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Sepsis is among the leading causes of morbidity, mortality, and cost overruns in critically ill patients. Early intervention with antibiotics improves survival in septic patients. However, no clinically validated system exists for real-time prediction of sepsis onset. We aimed to develop and validate an Artificial Intelligence Sepsis Expert algorithm for early prediction of sepsis.

DESIGN

Observational cohort study.

SETTING

Academic medical center from January 2013 to December 2015.

PATIENTS

Over 31,000 admissions to the ICUs at two Emory University hospitals (development cohort), in addition to over 52,000 ICU patients from the publicly available Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-III ICU database (validation cohort). Patients who met the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis (Sepsis-3) prior to or within 4 hours of their ICU admission were excluded, resulting in roughly 27,000 and 42,000 patients within our development and validation cohorts, respectively.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

High-resolution vital signs time series and electronic medical record data were extracted. A set of 65 features (variables) were calculated on hourly basis and passed to the Artificial Intelligence Sepsis Expert algorithm to predict onset of sepsis in the proceeding T hours (where T = 12, 8, 6, or 4). Artificial Intelligence Sepsis Expert was used to predict onset of sepsis in the proceeding T hours and to produce a list of the most significant contributing factors. For the 12-, 8-, 6-, and 4-hour ahead prediction of sepsis, Artificial Intelligence Sepsis Expert achieved area under the receiver operating characteristic in the range of 0.83-0.85. Performance of the Artificial Intelligence Sepsis Expert on the development and validation cohorts was indistinguishable.

CONCLUSIONS

Using data available in the ICU in real-time, Artificial Intelligence Sepsis Expert can accurately predict the onset of sepsis in an ICU patient 4-12 hours prior to clinical recognition. A prospective study is necessary to determine the clinical utility of the proposed sepsis prediction model.

摘要

目的

脓毒症是危重病患者发病率、死亡率和成本超支的主要原因之一。早期使用抗生素干预可提高脓毒症患者的生存率。然而,目前尚无用于实时预测脓毒症发作的临床验证系统。我们旨在开发和验证一种人工智能脓毒症专家算法,用于早期预测脓毒症。

设计

观察性队列研究。

设置

2013 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月,在埃默里大学的两家医院的 ICU 进行。

患者

来自埃默里大学两所医院 ICU 的超过 31000 例住院患者(开发队列),以及来自公开的医疗信息集市重症监护 III ICU 数据库的超过 52000 例 ICU 患者(验证队列)。排除了在 ICU 入院前或入院后 4 小时内符合第三次国际脓毒症定义(Sepsis-3)的患者,因此分别在开发队列和验证队列中大约有 27000 例和 42000 例患者。

干预措施

无。

测量和主要结果

提取高分辨率生命体征时间序列和电子病历数据。每小时计算一组 65 个特征(变量),并将其传递给人工智能脓毒症专家算法,以预测接下来 T 小时内脓毒症的发作(其中 T = 12、8、6 或 4)。人工智能脓毒症专家用于预测接下来 T 小时内脓毒症的发作,并生成最显著影响因素的列表。对于脓毒症的 12、8、6 和 4 小时前预测,人工智能脓毒症专家在接受者操作特征曲线下的面积在 0.83-0.85 之间。人工智能脓毒症专家在开发和验证队列中的性能无差异。

结论

使用 ICU 中实时可用的数据,人工智能脓毒症专家可以在临床识别前 4-12 小时准确预测 ICU 患者脓毒症的发作。需要前瞻性研究来确定所提出的脓毒症预测模型的临床实用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77bb/5851825/860c4e4fbe2e/nihms925069f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77bb/5851825/e2bb428fdaa3/nihms925069f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77bb/5851825/6844e3a25c92/nihms925069f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77bb/5851825/860c4e4fbe2e/nihms925069f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77bb/5851825/e2bb428fdaa3/nihms925069f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77bb/5851825/6844e3a25c92/nihms925069f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/77bb/5851825/860c4e4fbe2e/nihms925069f3.jpg

相似文献

1
An Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Accurate Prediction of Sepsis in the ICU.一种用于 ICU 中脓毒症准确预测的可解释机器学习模型。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr;46(4):547-553. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002936.
2
A Time-Phased Machine Learning Model for Real-Time Prediction of Sepsis in Critical Care.基于时相的机器学习模型对重症监护中脓毒症的实时预测
Crit Care Med. 2020 Oct;48(10):e884-e888. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004494.
3
Multicentre validation of a sepsis prediction algorithm using only vital sign data in the emergency department, general ward and ICU.仅使用生命体征数据在急诊科、普通病房和重症监护病房对脓毒症预测算法进行多中心验证。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 26;8(1):e017833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017833.
4
A Comparative Analysis of Sepsis Identification Methods in an Electronic Database.电子数据库中脓毒症识别方法的比较分析。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr;46(4):494-499. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002965.
5
Using machine learning methods to predict in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients in the ICU.使用机器学习方法预测 ICU 中脓毒症患者的院内死亡率。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Oct 2;20(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01271-2.
6
An Explainable Artificial Intelligence Predictor for Early Detection of Sepsis.用于脓毒症早期检测的可解释人工智能预测器。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Nov;48(11):e1091-e1096. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004550.
7
Early hospital mortality prediction of intensive care unit patients using an ensemble learning approach.基于集成学习方法的重症监护病房患者早期住院病死率预测。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Dec;108:185-195. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
8
Dynamic and explainable machine learning prediction of mortality in patients in the intensive care unit: a retrospective study of high-frequency data in electronic patient records.动态可解释机器学习预测 ICU 患者死亡率:电子患者记录中高频数据的回顾性研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Apr;2(4):e179-e191. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30018-2. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
9
The development an artificial intelligence algorithm for early sepsis diagnosis in the intensive care unit.开发一种用于重症监护病房早期脓毒症诊断的人工智能算法。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Sep;141:104176. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104176. Epub 2020 May 21.
10
Adaptation and Validation of a Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score and Evaluation of the Sepsis-3 Definitions in Critically Ill Children.儿童序贯器官衰竭评估评分的适应性与验证及危重症儿童中脓毒症-3定义的评估
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Oct 2;171(10):e172352. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.2352.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of an early prediction model for risk of influenza A and influenza B based on complete blood count examination.基于全血细胞计数检查的甲型和乙型流感风险早期预测模型的开发。
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Sep 1;25(1):1088. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-11502-4.
2
Mitigating antimicrobial resistance by innovative solutions in AI (MARISA): a modified James Lind Alliance analysis.通过人工智能创新解决方案减轻抗菌药物耐药性(MARISA):一项改良的詹姆斯·林德联盟分析
NPJ Antimicrob Resist. 2025 Sep 1;3(1):75. doi: 10.1038/s44259-025-00150-y.
3
Development of a Predictive Model for Neonatal Hospital-Acquired Gastrointestinal Infections Utilizing Multiple Machine Learning Algorithms.

本文引用的文献

1
Time to Treatment and Mortality during Mandated Emergency Care for Sepsis.脓毒症强制紧急治疗的治疗时间与死亡率
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 8;376(23):2235-2244. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1703058. Epub 2017 May 21.
2
Creating an automated trigger for sepsis clinical decision support at emergency department triage using machine learning.利用机器学习在急诊科分诊时创建用于脓毒症临床决策支持的自动触发机制。
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 6;12(4):e0174708. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174708. eCollection 2017.
3
Septic shock prediction for ICU patients via coupled HMM walking on sequential contrast patterns.
利用多种机器学习算法开发新生儿医院获得性胃肠道感染预测模型
Infect Drug Resist. 2025 Aug 18;18:4141-4156. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S533904. eCollection 2025.
4
Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for retrospective identification of suspected infection for sepsis surveillance: a multicentre cohort study.用于脓毒症监测中回顾性识别疑似感染的可解释机器学习模型的开发与验证:一项多中心队列研究
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Aug 8;87:103401. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103401. eCollection 2025 Sep.
5
Bug Wars: Artificial Intelligence Strikes Back in Sepsis Management.细菌大战:人工智能在脓毒症管理中卷土重来
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jul 28;15(15):1890. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15151890.
6
Personalized and real time hemodynamic management in critical care using Dynamic Cohort Ensemble Learning (DynaCEL).在重症监护中使用动态队列集成学习(DynaCEL)进行个性化实时血流动力学管理。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jul 24;8(1):474. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01863-0.
7
Early detection of ICU-acquired infections using high-frequency electronic health record data.利用高频电子健康记录数据早期检测重症监护病房获得性感染
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jul 21;25(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03031-6.
8
Sketching AI Concepts with Capabilities and Examples: AI Innovation in the Intensive Care Unit.通过功能与示例勾勒人工智能概念:重症监护病房中的人工智能创新
Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. 2024 May;2024. doi: 10.1145/3613904.3641896. Epub 2024 May 11.
9
Biorhythms derived from consumer wearables predict postoperative complications in children.源自消费级可穿戴设备的生物节律可预测儿童术后并发症。
Sci Adv. 2025 Jul 11;11(28):eadv2643. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adv2643. Epub 2025 Jul 9.
10
Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: a Scoping Review of the Evidence for Efficacy and Future Directions.医学教育中的人工智能:疗效证据及未来方向的范围综述
Med Sci Educ. 2025 Apr 2;35(3):1803-1816. doi: 10.1007/s40670-025-02373-0. eCollection 2025 Jun.
基于耦合隐马尔可夫模型在序列对比模式上的行走对重症监护病房患者进行脓毒症休克预测
J Biomed Inform. 2017 Feb;66:19-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.12.010. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
4
Prediction of Sepsis in the Intensive Care Unit With Minimal Electronic Health Record Data: A Machine Learning Approach.利用最少电子健康记录数据预测重症监护病房中的脓毒症:一种机器学习方法。
JMIR Med Inform. 2016 Sep 30;4(3):e28. doi: 10.2196/medinform.5909.
5
Prospective evaluation of an automated method to identify patients with severe sepsis or septic shock in the emergency department.急诊科中一种用于识别严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者的自动化方法的前瞻性评估。
BMC Emerg Med. 2016 Aug 22;16(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12873-016-0095-0.
6
MIMIC-III, a freely accessible critical care database.MIMIC-III,一个免费获取的重症监护数据库。
Sci Data. 2016 May 24;3:160035. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2016.35.
7
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义(脓毒症-3)》
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
8
Epidemiology of severe sepsis: 2008-2012.严重脓毒症的流行病学:2008 - 2012年
J Crit Care. 2016 Feb;31(1):58-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.09.034. Epub 2015 Oct 24.
9
Effect of an electronic medical record alert for severe sepsis among ED patients.电子病历警报对急诊科严重脓毒症患者的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Feb;34(2):185-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.10.005. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
10
A Multidisciplinary Sepsis Program Enabled by a Two-Stage Clinical Decision Support System: Factors That Influence Patient Outcomes.由两阶段临床决策支持系统支持的多学科脓毒症项目:影响患者预后的因素
Am J Med Qual. 2016 Nov;31(6):501-508. doi: 10.1177/1062860615606801. Epub 2015 Oct 21.