• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应对认知障碍和家庭护理:特刊介绍。

Coping with cognitive impairment and family caregiving: Introduction to the special section.

机构信息

Department of Health and Physical Education, The Education University of Hong Kong.

School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida.

出版信息

Psychol Aging. 2020 Feb;35(1):1-7. doi: 10.1037/pag0000436.

DOI:10.1037/pag0000436
PMID:31985244
Abstract

Consistent with the long history within of publishing high impact articles on family caregiving, the current Special Section includes 5 articles that provide important advances, in knowledge and in methodological sophistication, to the study of cognitive difficulty, impairment and family caregiving. One study used daily diary data over 14 days to conduct microlongitudinal analyses of the prospective impact of everyday memory failures on negative affect and marital interactions in older couples. Also relying on dyadic data, 2 other articles addressed the impact of caregiving on family members, including a study of the effects of transitioning to family caregiving over time on well-being in older husbands and wives, and a comparison of primary and secondary caregivers. Together, these articles represent important methodological advances in terms of the use of longitudinal data to study the effects of transition to cognitive impairment and spousal caregiving within the couple, and the inclusion of multiple caregivers to illustrate the impacts of caregiving in the broader family. In addition, two articles examined issues in clinical intervention for caregivers. Both articles offer new insights about the effectiveness of caregiver interventions, with the former focusing on the relative merits of offering intervention components in a flexible way over the manualized approach, and the latter a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to tease out the relative utility of different intervention characteristics and approaches, with a new lens to look at psychoeducational programs. The implications of these articles for family caregiving and further research advances are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

与在出版有关家庭护理的高影响力文章方面的悠久历史一致,本期特刊包括 5 篇文章,为认知困难、障碍和家庭护理的研究提供了重要的知识和方法上的进展。一项研究使用了 14 天的日常日记数据,对日常记忆失败对老年夫妇负面情绪和婚姻互动的前瞻性影响进行了微观纵向分析。另外两篇文章也依赖于对偶数据,研究了护理对家庭成员的影响,包括一项关于随着时间的推移过渡到家庭护理对老年夫妻幸福感的影响的研究,以及对主要和次要护理人员的比较。这些文章共同代表了在使用纵向数据研究夫妻内部认知障碍和配偶护理的过渡影响方面的重要方法学进展,以及纳入多个护理人员以说明护理在更广泛家庭中的影响。此外,还有两篇文章探讨了护理人员临床干预方面的问题。这两篇文章都提供了关于护理人员干预措施有效性的新见解,前者侧重于以灵活的方式提供干预组件相对于手册方法的相对优点,后者则是对不同干预特征和方法的相对效用进行全面的系统回顾和荟萃分析,为心理教育计划提供了一个新的视角。这些文章对家庭护理和进一步的研究进展的意义进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
Coping with cognitive impairment and family caregiving: Introduction to the special section.应对认知障碍和家庭护理:特刊介绍。
Psychol Aging. 2020 Feb;35(1):1-7. doi: 10.1037/pag0000436.
2
Effectiveness of a strength-oriented psychoeducation on caregiving competence, problem-solving abilities, psychosocial outcomes and physical health among family caregiver of stroke survivors: A randomised controlled trial.一项基于力量的心理教育对脑卒中幸存者家庭照顾者的照顾能力、解决问题能力、心理社会结局和身体健康的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Nov;87:84-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Jul 28.
3
Spouses' experience of caregiving for cancer patients: a literature review.配偶照顾癌症患者的体验:文献综述。
Int Nurs Rev. 2013 Jun;60(2):178-87. doi: 10.1111/inr.12000. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
4
[Caregiver burden in relatives of persons with schizophrenia: an overview of measure instruments].[精神分裂症患者亲属的照顾者负担:测量工具概述]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):137-47.
5
The mediating effects of leisure engagement on relationships between caregiving stress and subjective wellbeing among family caregivers of persons with cognitive impairment: A cross-sectional study.认知障碍患者家庭成员照顾者的照顾压力与主观幸福感之间关系的中介作用:一项横断面研究。
Geriatr Nurs. 2020 Mar-Apr;41(2):124-131. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2019.08.017. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
6
Dyadic relational resources and role strain in family caregivers of persons living with dementia at home: A cross-sectional survey.居家痴呆症患者家庭照护者的二元关系资源与角色紧张:一项横断面调查。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Apr;51(4):593-602. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
7
A systematic review of spousal couple-based intervention studies for couples coping with cancer: direction for the development of interventions.一项针对应对癌症的夫妻的基于配偶伴侣的干预研究的系统评价:干预措施的发展方向
Psychooncology. 2014 Jul;23(7):731-9. doi: 10.1002/pon.3535. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
8
Variability in spousal perceptions of caregiving and its relationship to older caregiver health outcomes.配偶对照顾的感知存在差异及其与老年照顾者健康结果的关系。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Sep;33(9):1504-1511. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4408-8. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
9
Changes in caregiving appraisal among family caregivers of persons with dementia: A longitudinal study over 12 months.痴呆症患者家庭照顾者的照顾评估变化:一项为期12个月的纵向研究。
Psychogeriatrics. 2018 Nov;18(6):460-467. doi: 10.1111/psyg.12360. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
10
Cognitive limitations in older adults receiving care reduces well-being among spouse caregivers.老年患者认知能力受限降低配偶照料者的幸福感。
Psychol Aging. 2020 Feb;35(1):28-40. doi: 10.1037/pag0000406.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the Lived Experiences of Caregiving for Older Family Members by Young Caregivers in Singapore: Transition, Trials, and Tribulations.探讨新加坡年轻照护者照顾老年家庭成员的生活体验:转变、困境和磨难。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Feb 5;21(2):182. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21020182.
2
Considerations of Family Functioning and Clinical Interventions.家庭功能考量与临床干预措施
Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2022 Aug 25;8:23337214221119054. doi: 10.1177/23337214221119054. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
3
Exploring positive experiences of primary and secondary caregivers of older persons in resource-limited urban settings in Accra, Ghana.
加纳阿克拉资源有限的城市环境中,初级和二级照护者对老年人的积极体验探索。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 1;17(4):e0266269. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266269. eCollection 2022.