Department of Cosmetology and Aesthetic Dermatology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
Department of Synthesis and Technology of Drugs, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
J Dermatolog Treat. 2021 Dec;32(8):945-949. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2020.1722310. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
Photoepilation has become a very popular epilation procedure in esthetic and cosmetic practice. There are some types of lasers and other light sources used for epilation.
The purpose of our study was to compare an IPL device with an IPL plus RF in one device, using a within-patient, right-left controlled study design.
PATIENTS/METHODS: Thirty-three patients completed four treatment sessions and the follow-up period of the study.
Hair reduction was effective after the first treatment, but similar results were achieved using the IPL system alone, and with IPL combined with RF. The degree of hair reduction increased after the following treatments, but the two methods yielded similar effects. Three months after the last treatment, some hair had regrown in both treatments, the combined IPL with RF treatment gave significantly better results than the IPL treatment alone.
In conclusion, IPL and IPL-RF are effective hair reduction therapies, yielding similar effects in patients with skin phototypes II or III. However, IPL-RF can be more effective in long-term observations. These therapies are also safe and regarded be quite comfortable in this population.
光子脱毛已经成为美容和皮肤科中非常流行的脱毛方法。有多种类型的激光和其他光源用于脱毛。
本研究的目的是使用患者自身左右侧对照研究设计,比较 IPL 设备和 IPL 加 RF 的设备。
患者/方法: 33 名患者完成了四次治疗和研究的随访期。
第一次治疗后毛发减少是有效的,但 IPL 系统单独使用和 IPL 联合 RF 也能达到相似的效果。后续治疗后毛发减少程度增加,但两种方法的效果相似。最后一次治疗后 3 个月,两种治疗方法都有一些毛发重新生长,联合 IPL 加 RF 治疗的效果明显优于 IPL 治疗。
总之,IPL 和 IPL-RF 是有效的脱毛治疗方法,对皮肤类型 II 或 III 的患者效果相似。然而,在长期观察中,IPL-RF 可能更有效。这些治疗方法在该人群中也是安全的,被认为相当舒适。