Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt School of Medicine.
The Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC) Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, TN.
Med Care. 2020 Apr;58(4):329-335. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001289.
In recent years, policymakers have paid particular attention to the emergence of a robust for-profit hospice sector and increased hospice use by nursing home residents. Previous research has explored financial incentives for nursing home-hospice use, but there has been limited research on nursing home-hospice partnerships and none on the extent of nursing home-hospice common ownership.
To describe trends in nursing home-hospice contracting and common ownership and to identify potential tradeoffs in care provided by nursing homes and hospice agencies that share common ownership.
Retrospective cohort study of nursing home-hospice patients between 2005 and 2015.
Between 2005 and 2015, the number of hospice agencies and nursing homes with common ownership grew substantially, now representing almost 1-in-5 providers in each sector. Relative to individuals using hospice in nursing homes without common ownership, adjusted analyses found that individuals receiving hospice from a commonly owned agency had a greater likelihood of having stays of 90 days or more [odds ratio (OR)=1.06; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.02-1.10], having a stay resulting in a live discharge (OR=1.06; 95% CI, 1.02-1.11), and having at least 1 registered nurse/licensed practical nurse visit during the last 3 days of life (OR=1.17; 95% CI, 1.05-1.29); these individuals also had a lower mean visit hours per day (-0.07; P=0.003).
Common ownership between hospice agencies and nursing homes is an emerging trend that reflects a broader push toward consolidation in the health care sector. Our analyses highlight potential concerns relevant to Medicare payment policy and are a first step toward improving our understanding of these trends and their implications.
近年来,政策制定者特别关注蓬勃发展的营利性临终关怀部门以及养老院居民对临终关怀的使用增加。先前的研究探讨了养老院-临终关怀使用的经济激励措施,但对养老院-临终关怀合作关系的研究有限,对养老院-临终关怀共同所有权的研究则更少。
描述养老院-临终关怀合同和共同所有权的趋势,并确定共同所有权的养老院和临终关怀机构在提供护理方面的潜在权衡。
对 2005 年至 2015 年间养老院-临终关怀患者的回顾性队列研究。
在 2005 年至 2015 年间,临终关怀机构和共同所有权养老院的数量大幅增长,现在分别占每个部门的近 1/5。与在没有共同所有权的养老院中使用临终关怀的个人相比,调整后的分析发现,从共同拥有的机构接受临终关怀的个人更有可能住院 90 天或更长时间[优势比(OR)=1.06;95%置信区间(CI),1.02-1.10],有存活出院的住院(OR=1.06;95%CI,1.02-1.11),并且在生命的最后 3 天至少有 1 名注册护士/执业护士探访(OR=1.17;95%CI,1.05-1.29);这些人每天的平均探访时间也更少(-0.07;P=0.003)。
临终关怀机构和养老院之间的共同所有权是一个新兴趋势,反映了医疗保健行业更广泛的整合趋势。我们的分析强调了与医疗保险支付政策相关的潜在问题,是提高我们对这些趋势及其影响的理解的第一步。