Thompson Eliza, Sanchez Pellecer Daniel, Hanson Gregory J, Inselman Shealeigh A, Manggaard Jenn M, Whitford Kevin J, Strand Jacob J, McCoy Rozalina G
Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic School of Graduate Medical Education, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Division of Community Internal Medicine, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Palliat Med Rep. 2025 Apr 3;6(1):144-152. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2024.0077. eCollection 2025.
Benefits of hospice care, such as improvement in quality of life and reduced costs, depend on duration of enrollment in hospice services, making timely hospice referral essential. Patient-, provider-, and system-level factors associated with hospice referral timing and length of stay (LOS) are unclear..
To review existing hospice referral patterns to identify patient- and system-level factors associated with hospice LOS.
We performed a retrospective review of all adult patients referred from our institution (located in Rochester, Minnesota, USA) to a nonprofit hospice agency between 2013 and 2017. The primary dependent variable was hospice LOS. Patient-level variables included demographic characteristics, place of residence, and hospice diagnosis. System-level variables included referral setting and provider-specific variables, such as title and gender. Statistical analyses were performed using multivariate logistic regression.
A total of 2072 patients were referred to hospice during the study period. Patient-level factors associated with LOS included hospice diagnosis and place of residence. Patients referred for cancer had a higher odds of a long LOS, while patients from long-term care facilities had a higher odds of a short LOS. System-level factors associated with LOS included provider gender and title. Referral by a female provider or by a physician, rather than an advanced practice provider, was associated with a lower odds of a short LOS.
Based on a review of hospice referral patterns, the integration of hospice care into subspecialty practices, long-term care facilities, and advanced practice education could be an effective strategy to improve hospice LOS.
临终关怀的益处,如生活质量的改善和成本的降低,取决于临终关怀服务的登记时长,因此及时进行临终关怀转诊至关重要。与临终关怀转诊时机和住院时长(LOS)相关的患者、提供者和系统层面因素尚不清楚。
回顾现有的临终关怀转诊模式,以确定与临终关怀住院时长相关的患者和系统层面因素。
我们对2013年至2017年间从我们机构(位于美国明尼苏达州罗切斯特)转诊至一家非营利性临终关怀机构的所有成年患者进行了回顾性研究。主要因变量是临终关怀住院时长。患者层面的变量包括人口统计学特征、居住地点和临终关怀诊断。系统层面的变量包括转诊环境和提供者特定变量,如职称和性别。使用多变量逻辑回归进行统计分析。
在研究期间,共有2072名患者被转诊至临终关怀机构。与住院时长相关的患者层面因素包括临终关怀诊断和居住地点。因癌症转诊的患者住院时间长的几率较高,而来自长期护理机构的患者住院时间短的几率较高。与住院时长相关的系统层面因素包括提供者性别和职称。由女性提供者或医生而非高级执业提供者进行转诊,与住院时间短的几率较低相关。
基于对临终关怀转诊模式的回顾,将临终关怀服务整合到专科实践、长期护理机构和高级执业教育中可能是改善临终关怀住院时长的有效策略。