• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

你能相信你所看到的吗?对 YouTube 上美容外科视频信息质量的评估。

Can You Trust What You Watch? An Assessment of the Quality of Information in Aesthetic Surgery Videos on YouTube.

机构信息

From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Albany Medical Center; and the State University of New York, Upstate Medical University.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Feb;145(2):329e-336e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006463.

DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000006463
PMID:31985630
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Videos on YouTube can be posted without regulation or content oversight. Unfortunately, many patients use YouTube as a resource on aesthetic surgery, leading to misinformation. Currently, there are no objective assessments of the quality of information on YouTube about aesthetic surgery.

METHODS

YouTube was queried for videos about the 12 most common aesthetic surgical procedures, identified from the 2015 American Society of Plastic Surgeons procedural statistics between May and June of 2016. The top 25 results for each search term were scored using the modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients criteria based on video structure, content, and author identification. Average Ensuring Quality Information for Patients score, view count, and video duration were compared between authorship groups.

RESULTS

A total of 523 videos were graded after excluding duplicates. The mean modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients score for all videos was 13.1 (SE, 0.18) of a possible 27. The videos under the search "nose reshaping" had the lowest mean score of 10.24 (SE, 0.74), whereas "breast augmentation" had the highest score of 15.96 (SE, 0.65). Physician authorship accounted for 59 percent of included videos and had a higher mean Ensuring Quality Information for Patients score than those by patients. Only three of the 21 search terms had a mean modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients score meeting criteria for high-quality videos.

CONCLUSIONS

The information contained in aesthetic surgery videos on YouTube is low quality. Patients should be aware that the information has the potential to be inaccurate. Plastic surgeons should be encouraged to develop high-quality videos to educate patients.

摘要

背景

YouTube 上的视频可以在没有监管或内容监督的情况下发布。不幸的是,许多患者将 YouTube 作为美容手术的资源,导致信息错误。目前,还没有对关于美容手术的 YouTube 上信息质量的客观评估。

方法

2016 年 5 月至 6 月,我们在 YouTube 上查询了 2015 年美国整形外科学会程序统计中排名前 12 位的美容手术的视频。每个搜索词的前 25 个结果根据视频结构、内容和作者识别情况,使用改良的 Ensuring Quality Information for Patients 标准进行评分。比较了作者群体之间的平均 Ensuring Quality Information for Patients 评分、观看次数和视频时长。

结果

在排除重复项后,共有 523 个视频被评分。所有视频的平均改良 Ensuring Quality Information for Patients 评分为 13.1(SE,0.18),满分为 27 分。在搜索“鼻部重塑”的视频中,平均得分最低,为 10.24(SE,0.74),而“乳房增大”的得分最高,为 15.96(SE,0.65)。医生作者的作品占所有视频的 59%,平均 Ensuring Quality Information for Patients 评分高于患者作者。在 21 个搜索词中,只有 3 个的平均改良 Ensuring Quality Information for Patients 评分达到高质量视频的标准。

结论

YouTube 上美容手术视频中的信息质量较低。患者应该意识到这些信息有可能不准确。应该鼓励整形外科医生制作高质量的视频来教育患者。

相似文献

1
Can You Trust What You Watch? An Assessment of the Quality of Information in Aesthetic Surgery Videos on YouTube.你能相信你所看到的吗?对 YouTube 上美容外科视频信息质量的评估。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Feb;145(2):329e-336e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006463.
2
Evaluation of the Reliability, Utility, and Quality of the Information in Sleeve Gastrectomy Videos Shared on Open Access Video Sharing Platform YouTube.开放获取视频分享平台YouTube上袖状胃切除术视频中信息的可靠性、实用性及质量评估
Obes Surg. 2019 May;29(5):1477-1484. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03738-2.
3
Quality of Online Video Resources Concerning Patient Education for the Meniscus: A YouTube-Based Quality-Control Study.基于 YouTube 的半月板患者教育在线视频资源质量控制研究:一项质量控制研究。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Jan;36(1):233-238. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.07.033.
4
Assessing the quality and reliability of patient information regarding aesthetic fat grafting on YouTube.评估 YouTube 上有关美容脂肪移植的患者信息的质量和可靠性。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022 Jul;75(7):2343-2345. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.01.053. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
5
Otoplasty Online Information: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Websites and Videos that Patients View Regarding Cosmetic Ear Surgery.耳整形术在线信息:对患者浏览的有关耳部整形手术的网站和视频的综合分析。
Facial Plast Surg. 2018 Feb;34(1):82-87. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1615280. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
6
Analysis of the quality, reliability, and popularity of information on strabismus on YouTube.分析 YouTube 上斜视相关信息的质量、可靠性和普及度。
Strabismus. 2020 Dec;28(4):175-180. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2020.1836002. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
7
YouTube for Cosmetic Plastic Surgery: An Effective Patient Resource?YouTube 用于美容整形手术:一种有效的患者资源?
Aesthet Surg J. 2020 Apr 14;40(5):NP314-NP319. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjz268.
8
YouTube Videos as a Source of Misinformation on Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.YouTube 视频作为特发性肺纤维化错误信息的来源。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 May;16(5):572-579. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201809-644OC.
9
Is YouTube a sufficient source of information on Sarcoidosis?YouTube 上有关结节病的信息足够丰富吗?
Respir Res. 2024 Sep 9;25(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-02956-2.
10
Websites or Videos: Which Offer Better Information for Patients? A Comparative Analysis of the Quality of YouTube Videos and Websites for Cosmetic Injectables.网站还是视频:哪个为患者提供的信息更好?对美容注射用 YouTube 视频和网站质量的比较分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Mar 1;149(3):596-606. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008827.

引用本文的文献

1
Tools/instruments for assessing YouTube videos on surgical procedures for patient/consumer health education: a systematic review.用于评估YouTube上手术操作患者/消费者健康教育视频的工具/仪器:一项系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 10;13:1575801. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1575801. eCollection 2025.
2
Assessing the Knowledge and Insight of Medical Students into the Field of Plastic Surgery: A Step Toward Creating Well-Rounded Healthcare Professionals.评估医学生对整形外科领域的知识与见解:迈向培养全面发展的医疗专业人员的一步。
Cureus. 2024 Jul 12;16(7):e64430. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64430. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
What are Board-Certified Plastic Surgeons Posting on Instagram?
整形医师在 Instagram 上发布什么内容?
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024 Oct;48(19):4051-4058. doi: 10.1007/s00266-024-04144-5. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
4
Perceptions, awareness and influences of medical students towards plastic surgery: A systematic review.医学生对整形手术的认知、意识及影响:一项系统综述。
JPRAS Open. 2024 Apr 8;40:320-335. doi: 10.1016/j.jpra.2024.04.003. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
An Emerging Ophthalmology Challenge: A Narrative Review of TikTok Trends Impacting Eye Health Among Children and Adolescents.一个新出现的眼科挑战:关于TikTok趋势对儿童和青少年眼部健康影响的叙述性综述
Ophthalmol Ther. 2024 Apr;13(4):895-902. doi: 10.1007/s40123-024-00885-3. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
6
Health Literacy in Oculofacial Plastic Surgery: A Literature Review.眼面部整形手术中的健康素养:文献综述
Cureus. 2023 Jul 7;15(7):e41518. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41518. eCollection 2023 Jul.
7
The New Era of Marketing in Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Algorithm of Social Media and Digital Marketing.整形外科学术营销的新时代:社交媒体与数字营销的系统评价及算法
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2023 Feb 28;5:ojad024. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojad024. eCollection 2023.
8
Temporomandibular disorders-related videos on YouTube are unreliable sources of medical information: A cross-sectional analysis of quality and content.YouTube上与颞下颌关节紊乱症相关的视频是不可靠的医学信息来源:质量与内容的横断面分析
Digit Health. 2023 Feb 5;9:20552076231154377. doi: 10.1177/20552076231154377. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
9
Evaluating the Quality and Reliability of Gender-affirming Surgery Videos on YouTube and TikTok.评估YouTube和TikTok上性别确认手术视频的质量与可靠性。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Jul 28;10(7):e4443. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004443. eCollection 2022 Jul.
10
Mining the Twittersphere: Insights about Public Interest in Facial Reanimation Surgery from a Decade of Twitter Data.挖掘推特领域:基于十年推特数据洞察公众对面部重建手术的兴趣
Indian J Plast Surg. 2021 Dec 13;55(1):31-35. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1740080. eCollection 2022 Feb.