Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Sports Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, U.S.A..
University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, IL, U.S.A.
Arthroscopy. 2020 Jan;36(1):233-238. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.07.033.
To evaluate the reliability and educational content of YouTube videos concerning the menisci.
YouTube was queried using the keyword "meniscus." The first 50 videos were evaluated. Eleven video characteristics were extracted, and videos were categorized by source and content. Video reliability was assessed using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria (score range, 0-5). Video educational content was assessed using the Global Quality Score (GQS; score range, 0-4) and a meniscus-specific score (MSS; score range, 0-20).
The mean video duration was 551.44 ± 1,046.04 seconds (range, 75-7,282 seconds). The mean number of views was 288,597.7 ± 735,275.9. Collectively, the 50 videos accrued 14,141,285 views. The mean JAMA score, GQS, and MSS were 1.55, 2.12, and 3.67, respectively. The video source was predominately non-physician based (24.49% of source uploaders), whereas video content was predominately concerned with disease information (37.50% of content). Significant between-group effects were observed for the JAMA score and video content (P = .0155), with videos concerning disease information, exercise training, and nonsurgical intervention having the highest mean JAMA scores. Significant between-group effects were also observed for the JAMA score based on video upload source (P < .001), with videos uploaded by physicians receiving the highest mean JAMA scores. The mean GQS and MSS were significantly greater for videos categorized as having disease-specific content (P = .0377 and P = .0404, respectively) and for physician video uploaders (P = .0133 and P = .0100, respectively). The number of video dislikes was a negative independent predictor of the JAMA score (β = -0.007, P = .003). Disease-specific content was a positive independent predictor of the GQS (β = 1.13, P = .042). There were no independent predictors of the MSS.
Information on the meniscus found in YouTube videos is of low quality and reliability.
Orthopaedic health practitioners should caution patients about the inaccuracy of YouTube videos regarding the meniscus given the low quality of content. These health care providers should make efforts to provide patients with higher-quality alternatives.
评估有关半月板的 YouTube 视频的可靠性和教育内容。
使用关键字“半月板”在 YouTube 上进行查询。评估前 50 个视频。提取了 11 个视频特征,并按来源和内容对视频进行分类。使用美国医学会杂志(JAMA)基准标准(评分范围:0-5)评估视频可靠性。使用全球质量评分(GQS;评分范围:0-4)和半月板特定评分(MSS;评分范围:0-20)评估视频教育内容。
视频平均时长为 551.44±1046.04 秒(范围:75-7282 秒)。平均观看次数为 288597.7±735275.9。这 50 个视频总计获得 14141285 次观看。平均 JAMA 评分、GQS 和 MSS 分别为 1.55、2.12 和 3.67。视频来源主要是非医师(24.49%的来源上传者),而视频内容主要关注疾病信息(37.50%的内容)。JAMA 评分和视频内容存在显著的组间效应(P=0.0155),涉及疾病信息、运动训练和非手术干预的视频具有最高的平均 JAMA 评分。根据视频上传来源,JAMA 评分也存在显著的组间效应(P<0.001),由医师上传的视频获得的平均 JAMA 评分最高。具有疾病特异性内容的视频的平均 GQS 和 MSS 明显更高(P=0.0377 和 P=0.0404),由医师上传的视频也是如此(P=0.0133 和 P=0.0100)。视频不喜欢的数量是 JAMA 评分的负独立预测因子(β=-0.007,P=0.003)。疾病特异性内容是 GQS 的正独立预测因子(β=1.13,P=0.042)。MSS 没有独立的预测因子。
YouTube 视频中有关半月板的信息质量和可靠性较低。
鉴于内容质量低,骨科保健从业者应提醒患者注意 YouTube 视频中有关半月板的不准确信息。这些医疗保健提供者应努力为患者提供更高质量的替代方案。