Suppr超能文献

与体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)期间溶血相关的因素(VA 与 VV ECMO 比较)。

Factors associated with hemolysis during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-Comparison of VA- versus VV ECMO.

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Jan 27;15(1):e0227793. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227793. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Venovenous (VV) and venoarterial (VA) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are effective support modalities to treat critically ill patients. ECMO-associated hemolysis remains a serious complication. The aim was to disclose similarities and differences in VA- and VV ECMO-associated hemolysis. This is a retrospective single-center analysis (January 2012 to September 2018) including 1,063 adult consecutive patients (VA, n = 606; VV, n = 457). Severe hemolysis (free plasma hemoglobin, fHb > 500 mg/l) during therapy occurred in 4% (VA) and 2% (VV) (p≤0.001). VV ECMO showed significantly more hemolysis by pump head thrombosis (PHT) compared to VA ECMO (9% vs. 2%; p≤0.001). Pretreatments (ECPR, cardiac surgery) of patients who required VA ECMO caused high fHb pre levels which aggravates the proof of ECMO-induced hemolysis (median (interquartile range), VA: fHb pre: 225.0 (89.3-458.0); VV: fHb pre: 72.0 (42.0-138.0); p≤0.001). The survival rate to discharge from hospital differed depending on ECMO type (40% (VA) vs. 63% (VV); p≤0.001). Hemolysis was dominant in VA ECMO patients, mainly caused by different indications and not by the ECMO support itself. PHT was the most severe form of ECMO-induced hemolysis that occurs in both therapies with low frequency, but more commonly in VV ECMO due to prolonged support time.

摘要

静脉-静脉(VV)和静脉-动脉(VA)体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)是治疗危重病患者的有效支持方式。ECMO 相关溶血仍然是一种严重的并发症。本研究旨在揭示 VA 和 VV ECMO 相关溶血的异同。这是一项回顾性单中心分析(2012 年 1 月至 2018 年 9 月),共纳入 1063 例连续成年患者(VA 组,n=606;VV 组,n=457)。治疗过程中严重溶血(游离血浆血红蛋白,fHb>500mg/l)的发生率分别为 4%(VA)和 2%(VV)(p≤0.001)。与 VA ECMO 相比,VV ECMO 因泵头血栓形成(PHT)导致的溶血明显更多(9%比 2%;p≤0.001)。需要 VA ECMO 的患者的预处理(ECPR、心脏手术)导致 fHb 预水平升高,这加剧了 ECMO 诱导的溶血的证据(中位数(四分位距),VA:fHb 预:225.0(89.3-458.0);VV:fHb 预:72.0(42.0-138.0);p≤0.001)。两种 ECMO 类型的出院存活率不同(40%(VA)比 63%(VV);p≤0.001)。VA ECMO 患者的溶血占主导地位,主要是由于不同的适应证,而不是 ECMO 支持本身。PHT 是 ECMO 诱导溶血最严重的形式,两种治疗方法均很少见,但在 VV ECMO 中更为常见,因为支持时间更长。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8074/6984694/87c73dba947e/pone.0227793.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验