Department of Ophthalmology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Class 2, Oral Medicine Department, Jinggangshan University, Jinggangshan, China.
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021 Mar;31(2):397-404. doi: 10.1177/1120672120901704. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
We propose a new method to analyze the feasibility of calculating proptosis on the basis of simple Pythagorean theorem.
This is a non-inferiority trial, and the registration number is ChiCTR1900026490. The absolute value of proptosis of two eyes of patients without eye injury or diseases visiting our clinic from December 2017 to June 2019 was measured by computed tomography, Hertel exophthalmometer, and by simple Pythagorean theorem. With the application of MedCalc software version 19.0.4, the differences between these methods in two eyes were showed by Bland and Altman plot.
A 95% limit of agreement between computed tomography and Hertel exophthalmometer is -0.7 to 0.62 mm in right eye proptosis. A total of 4.44% (4/90) points were outside 95% limit of agreement. Similarly, the same method was used to compare the proptosis between computed tomography and other ways. We also compared the proptosis measured by homolateral and heterolateral simple Pythagorean theorem method in order to find out the consistence between them. The points in all Bland and Altman plots were lower than 5%, which means that the results of comparison between any two methods had a good consistency in the measurement of proptosis of both eyes.
Pythagorean theorem can be applied to evaluate proptosis and has a good consistency comparing with computed tomography and the Hertel exophthalmometer. The method can be used for measuring proptosis of unilateral orbital, maxillofacial trauma, and dysplasia accurately. It is practical in clinical use of proptosis assessment because of its accuracy, reliability, and simplicity.
我们提出了一种新的方法,基于简单的毕达哥拉斯定理来分析计算眼球突出度的可行性。
这是一项非劣效性试验,注册号为 ChiCTR1900026490。2017 年 12 月至 2019 年 6 月期间,我们诊所就诊的无眼部损伤或疾病的患者的双眼眼球突出度通过计算机断层扫描、Hertel 突眼计和简单的毕达哥拉斯定理进行测量。使用 MedCalc 软件版本 19.0.4,通过 Bland 和 Altman 图展示这些方法在双眼之间的差异。
在右眼眼球突出度方面,计算机断层扫描与 Hertel 突眼计之间的 95%一致性界限为-0.7 至 0.62mm。共有 4.44%(4/90)个点超出 95%一致性界限。同样,使用相同的方法比较了计算机断层扫描与其他方法之间的眼球突出度。我们还比较了同侧和对侧简单毕达哥拉斯定理方法测量的眼球突出度,以找出它们之间的一致性。所有 Bland 和 Altman 图中的点均低于 5%,这意味着任何两种方法之间的比较结果在双眼眼球突出度的测量中具有良好的一致性。
毕达哥拉斯定理可用于评估眼球突出度,与计算机断层扫描和 Hertel 突眼计具有良好的一致性。该方法可用于准确测量单侧眼眶、颌面外伤和发育不良的眼球突出度。由于其准确性、可靠性和简单性,在眼球突出度评估的临床应用中具有实用性。