• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

梅尼埃病相关网络信息的批判性分析。

A Critical Analysis of the Information Available Online for Ménière's Disease.

机构信息

Michigan Ear Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Mar;162(3):329-336. doi: 10.1177/0194599819901150. Epub 2020 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1177/0194599819901150
PMID:31986955
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Patients increasingly rely on online resources for medical information; however, the Internet is unregulated and prone to misinformation. This study analyzes the reliability, quality, and readability of websites for Ménière's disease.

STUDY DESIGN

A Google search was performed using keywords . The first 5 pages (50 results) were reviewed. Websites were sorted into 5 categories: academic institutions, government agencies, professional organizations, medical information websites, and miscellaneous. The reliability, quality, and readability of each website were evaluated using the DISCERN instrument and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL). DISCERN assesses reliability and quality by scoring 15 questions on a scale from 1 (low) to 3 (high). The reliability score emphasizes clear objectives and sources, as well as lack of bias, whereas the quality score emphasizes information on treatment options. The FKGL of each website was calculated using a formula to determine the equivalent US grade reading level.

SETTING

Ambulatory.

SUBJECTS

None.

RESULTS

Forty-two websites were analyzed. Academic institutions were the most common (n = 13, 31%) but scored the lowest using DISCERN at 1.75 ± 0.13. Medical information websites scored highest at 2.24 ± 0.09 ( = .024 compared to academic institutions). The average FKGL of all websites was 10.12 ± 0.57 with medical information websites being the easiest to read at 8.84 ± 0.83. Only 5 (13%) of websites scored below the eighth-grade reading level.

CONCLUSIONS

Most top online search results for Ménière's disease are deficient in quality and readability. Medical information websites are generally the most reliable and easy to read.

摘要

目的

患者越来越依赖在线资源获取医学信息;然而,互联网是不受监管的,且容易出现错误信息。本研究分析了梅尼埃病相关网站的可靠性、质量和可读性。

研究设计

使用关键词进行谷歌搜索。查看前 5 页(50 个结果)。将网站分为 5 类:学术机构、政府机构、专业组织、医学信息网站和其他。使用 DISCERN 工具和 Flesch-Kincaid 等级(FKGL)评估每个网站的可靠性、质量和可读性。DISCERN 通过对 15 个问题进行评分(从 1(低)到 3(高))来评估可靠性和质量。可靠性评分强调明确的目标和来源,以及缺乏偏见,而质量评分则强调治疗方案的信息。每个网站的 FKGL 通过一个公式计算得出,用于确定美国相应的年级阅读水平。

设置

门诊。

受试者

无。

结果

分析了 42 个网站。学术机构最为常见(n=13,31%),但使用 DISCERN 评估的得分最低,为 1.75±0.13。医学信息网站的得分最高,为 2.24±0.09(与学术机构相比,=0.024)。所有网站的平均 FKGL 为 10.12±0.57,医学信息网站的阅读难度最低,为 8.84±0.83。仅有 5 个(13%)网站的评分低于八年级阅读水平。

结论

梅尼埃病的大多数顶级在线搜索结果在质量和可读性方面存在不足。医学信息网站通常最可靠且易于阅读。

相似文献

1
A Critical Analysis of the Information Available Online for Ménière's Disease.梅尼埃病相关网络信息的批判性分析。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Mar;162(3):329-336. doi: 10.1177/0194599819901150. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
2
Evaluating the quality and readability of Internet information sources regarding the treatment of swallowing disorders.评估有关吞咽障碍治疗的互联网信息来源的质量和可读性。
Ear Nose Throat J. 2017 Mar;96(3):128-138. doi: 10.1177/014556131709600312.
3
Quality and readability of websites for patient information on tonsillectomy and sleep apnea.扁桃体切除术和睡眠呼吸暂停患者信息网站的质量与可读性。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Jul;98:1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.04.031. Epub 2017 Apr 23.
4
All I Have Learned, I Have Learned from Google: Why Today's Facial Rejuvenation Patients are Prone to Misinformation, and the Steps We can take to Contend with Unreliable Information.我所学的一切,皆来自谷歌:为何如今的面部年轻化患者容易被误导,以及我们应对不可靠信息可采取的措施。
Facial Plast Surg. 2019 Aug;35(4):387-392. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1693033. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
5
Otosclerosis online: a critical analysis of quality, reliability, readability and content of otosclerosis information.耳硬化症在线:耳硬化症信息质量、可靠性、可读性和内容的批判性分析。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Jan;281(1):503-508. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08311-3. Epub 2023 Nov 1.
6
Evaluating the Quality, Content, and Readability of Online Resources for Failed Back Spinal Surgery.评估失败性脊柱手术后在线资源的质量、内容和可读性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Apr 1;44(7):494-502. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002870.
7
What parents are reading about laryngomalacia: Quality and readability of internet resources on laryngomalacia.家长们正在阅读的关于喉软化症的内容:喉软化症网络资源的质量与可读性。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 May;108:175-179. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.02.036. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
8
Readability assessment of online tracheostomy care resources.在线气管造口护理资源的可读性评估。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Feb;152(2):272-8. doi: 10.1177/0194599814560338. Epub 2014 Dec 1.
9
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure: an assessment of the quality and readability of online information.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)操作:在线信息质量和可读性的评估。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 May 5;21(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01513-x.
10
Readability of online patient education materials for parents after a failed newborn hearing screen.新生儿听力筛查未通过后提供给家长的在线患者教育材料的可读性
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Oct;125:168-174. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.07.009. Epub 2019 Jul 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital Motherhood in the Postpartum Period: A Descriptive Study.产后时期的数字育儿:一项描述性研究。
Matern Child Health J. 2025 Mar;29(3):376-385. doi: 10.1007/s10995-025-04058-x. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
2
Otosclerosis online: a critical analysis of quality, reliability, readability and content of otosclerosis information.耳硬化症在线:耳硬化症信息质量、可靠性、可读性和内容的批判性分析。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Jan;281(1):503-508. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08311-3. Epub 2023 Nov 1.
3
A critical readability and quality analysis of internet-based patient information on neck dissections.
基于互联网的颈部解剖患者信息的关键可读性与质量分析
World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Apr 26;9(1):59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2021.07.001. eCollection 2023 Mar.
4
Readability and quality assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to nasal septoplasty.互联网鼻中隔成形术相关患者教育资料的可读性和质量评估。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021 Mar 17;50(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40463-021-00507-z.