• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器学习方法可在 4.5 小时内识别中风。

Machine Learning Approach to Identify Stroke Within 4.5 Hours.

机构信息

From the Health Innovation Big Data Center, Asan Institute for Life Science, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. (H.L.).

Department of Neurology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. (E.-J.L., H.-B.L., S.U.K., J.S.K., D.-W.K.).

出版信息

Stroke. 2020 Mar;51(3):860-866. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027611. Epub 2020 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027611
PMID:31987014
Abstract

Background and Purpose- We aimed to investigate the ability of machine learning (ML) techniques analyzing diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) magnetic resonance imaging to identify patients within the recommended time window for thrombolysis. Methods- We analyzed DWI and FLAIR images of consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke within 24 hours of clear symptom onset by applying automatic image processing approaches. These processes included infarct segmentation, DWI, and FLAIR imaging registration and image feature extraction. A total of 89 vector features from each image sequence were captured and used in the ML. Three ML models were developed to estimate stroke onset time for binary classification (≤4.5 hours): logistic regression, support vector machine, and random forest. To evaluate the performance of ML models, the sensitivity and specificity for identifying patients within 4.5 hours were compared with the sensitivity and specificity of human readings of DWI-FLAIR mismatch. Results- Data from a total of 355 patients were analyzed. DWI-FLAIR mismatch from human readings identified patients within 4.5 hours of symptom onset with 48.5% sensitivity and 91.3% specificity. ML algorithms had significantly greater sensitivities than human readers (75.8% for logistic regression, =0.020; 72.7% for support vector machine, =0.033; 75.8% for random forest, =0.013) in detecting patients within 4.5 hours, but their specificities were comparable (82.6% for logistic regression, =0.157; 82.6% for support vector machine, =0.157; 82.6% for random forest, =0.157). Conclusions- ML algorithms using multiple magnetic resonance imaging features were feasible even more sensitive than human readings in identifying patients with stroke within the time window for acute thrombolysis.

摘要

背景与目的- 我们旨在研究机器学习(ML)技术分析弥散加权成像(DWI)和液体衰减反转恢复(FLAIR)磁共振成像的能力,以识别溶栓治疗推荐时间窗内的患者。方法- 通过应用自动图像处理方法,对发病 24 小时内的连续急性缺血性脑卒中患者的 DWI 和 FLAIR 图像进行分析。这些过程包括梗死分割、DWI 和 FLAIR 成像配准以及图像特征提取。从每个图像序列中捕获了总共 89 个向量特征,并用于 ML 中。为了对 ML 模型进行评估,将用于二进制分类(≤4.5 小时)的模型的灵敏度和特异性与 DWI-FLAIR 不匹配的人工读数的灵敏度和特异性进行了比较。结果- 共分析了 355 例患者的数据。DWI-FLAIR 不匹配的人工读数可识别出发病 4.5 小时内的患者,其灵敏度为 48.5%,特异性为 91.3%。ML 算法的灵敏度明显高于人工读数(逻辑回归为 75.8%,=0.020;支持向量机为 72.7%,=0.033;随机森林为 75.8%,=0.013),可检测出 4.5 小时内的患者,但特异性相当(逻辑回归为 82.6%,=0.157;支持向量机为 82.6%,=0.157;随机森林为 82.6%,=0.157)。结论- 使用多个磁共振成像特征的 ML 算法甚至比人工读数更灵敏,可在急性溶栓治疗时间窗内识别出卒中患者。

相似文献

1
Machine Learning Approach to Identify Stroke Within 4.5 Hours.机器学习方法可在 4.5 小时内识别中风。
Stroke. 2020 Mar;51(3):860-866. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027611. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
2
An automatic machine learning approach for ischemic stroke onset time identification based on DWI and FLAIR imaging.一种基于 DWI 和 FLAIR 成像的缺血性脑卒中发病时间自动识别的机器学习方法。
Neuroimage Clin. 2021;31:102744. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102744. Epub 2021 Jul 3.
3
The Effects of DWI-Infarct Lesion Volume on DWI-FLAIR Mismatch: Is There a Need for Size Stratification?弥散加权成像梗死灶体积对弥散加权成像与液体衰减反转恢复序列不匹配的影响:是否需要进行大小分层?
J Neuroimaging. 2017 Jul;27(4):392-396. doi: 10.1111/jon.12407. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
4
Can diffusion-weighted imaging-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery mismatch (positive diffusion-weighted imaging/negative fluid-attenuated inversion recovery) at 3 Tesla identify patients with stroke at <4.5 hours?3T 时弥散加权成像液体衰减反转恢复不匹配(弥散加权成像阳性/液体衰减反转恢复阴性)能否在 4.5 小时内识别出脑卒中患者?
Stroke. 2013 Jun;44(6):1647-51. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001001. Epub 2013 May 2.
5
Prediction of Stroke Onset Is Improved by Relative Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery and Perfusion Imaging Compared to the Visual Diffusion-Weighted Imaging/Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Mismatch.相对流体衰减反转恢复和灌注成像较视觉弥散加权成像/流体衰减反转恢复不匹配可提高卒中发病预测。
Stroke. 2016 Oct;47(10):2559-64. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013903. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
6
Automated DWI analysis can identify patients within the thrombolysis time window of 4.5 hours.自动 DWI 分析可识别出在 4.5 小时溶栓时间窗内的患者。
Neurology. 2018 May 1;90(18):e1570-e1577. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005413. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
7
DWI-FLAIR mismatch for the identification of patients with acute ischaemic stroke within 4·5 h of symptom onset (PRE-FLAIR): a multicentre observational study.DWI-FLAIR 不匹配对症状发作 4.5 小时内的急性缺血性脑卒中患者的识别(PRE-FLAIR):一项多中心观察性研究。
Lancet Neurol. 2011 Nov;10(11):978-86. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70192-2. Epub 2011 Oct 4.
8
Diffusion-weighted image and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery image mismatch: unclear-onset versus clear-onset stroke.弥散加权成像与液体衰减反转恢复成像不匹配:不明原因发病与明确原因发病的卒中。
Stroke. 2014 Feb;45(2):450-5. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002830. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
9
Negative fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging identifies acute ischemic stroke at 3 hours or less.液体衰减反转恢复序列阴性成像可在3小时或更短时间内识别急性缺血性卒中。
Ann Neurol. 2009 Jun;65(6):724-32. doi: 10.1002/ana.21651.
10
Clinical characteristics of unknown symptom onset stroke patients with and without diffusion-weighted imaging and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery mismatch.起病隐匿的脑梗死患者中存在 DWI 与 FLAIR 不匹配的临床特征分析。
Int J Stroke. 2018 Jan;13(1):66-73. doi: 10.1177/1747493017706245. Epub 2017 Apr 20.

引用本文的文献

1
What Is Fair? Defining Fairness in Machine Learning for Health.什么是公平?定义医疗领域机器学习中的公平性。
Stat Med. 2025 Sep;44(20-22):e70234. doi: 10.1002/sim.70234.
2
The best diagnostic approach for classifying ischemic stroke onset time: A systematic review and meta-analysis.用于对缺血性卒中发病时间进行分类的最佳诊断方法:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neuroradiology. 2025 Sep 12. doi: 10.1007/s00234-025-03745-4.
3
Automated DWI-FLAIR mismatch assessment in stroke using DWI only.仅使用扩散加权成像(DWI)对卒中进行自动DWI-液体衰减反转恢复序列(FLAIR)不匹配评估。
Eur Stroke J. 2025 Aug 28:23969873251362712. doi: 10.1177/23969873251362712.
4
Deep learning to identify stroke within 4.5 h using DWI and FLAIR in a prospective multicenter study.一项前瞻性多中心研究中利用扩散加权成像(DWI)和液体衰减反转恢复序列(FLAIR)通过深度学习在4.5小时内识别中风。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 19;15(1):26262. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10804-6.
5
Predicting Ischemic Stroke Patients to Transfer for Endovascular Thrombectomy Using Machine Learning: A Case Study.使用机器学习预测缺血性中风患者是否需要转院进行血管内血栓切除术:一项案例研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 16;13(12):1435. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13121435.
6
Imaging-based machine learning to evaluate the severity of ischemic stroke in the middle cerebral artery territory.基于影像学的机器学习用于评估大脑中动脉区域缺血性卒中的严重程度。
BMC Med Imaging. 2025 May 30;25(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12880-025-01745-7.
7
Optimizing Stroke Risk Prediction: A Primary Dataset-Driven Ensemble Classifier With Explainable Artificial Intelligence.优化中风风险预测:一种基于主要数据集驱动的可解释人工智能集成分类器。
Health Sci Rep. 2025 May 5;8(5):e70799. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70799. eCollection 2025 May.
8
Peritumoral features for assessing invasiveness of lung adenocarcinoma manifesting as ground-glass nodules.用于评估表现为磨玻璃结节的肺腺癌侵袭性的瘤周特征。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 23;15(1):14112. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99180-9.
9
A deep learning approach versus expert clinician panel in the classification of posterior circulation infarction.深度学习方法与专家临床医生小组在后循环梗死分类中的比较
Neuroimage Clin. 2025;45:103732. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2025.103732. Epub 2025 Jan 12.
10
Explainable artificial intelligence for stroke prediction through comparison of deep learning and machine learning models.通过深度学习与机器学习模型比较实现可解释的人工智能用于中风预测
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):31392. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-82931-5.