• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青少年和青年初级保健诊所中的选民登记和参与。

Voter Registration and Engagement in an Adolescent and Young Adult Primary Care Clinic.

机构信息

Section of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Helen DeVos Children's Hospital, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan.

Section of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Helen DeVos Children's Hospital, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan; Department of Pediatrics and Human Development, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, Michigan.

出版信息

J Adolesc Health. 2020 Jun;66(6):747-749. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.11.316. Epub 2020 Jan 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.11.316
PMID:31987722
Abstract

PURPOSE

Our aim was to bridge access to voter registration for youth by offering this service within a primary care setting and study the impact of this intervention on voter engagement and the barriers to voter turnout for registered youth voters.

METHODS

A total of 120 eligible youth were presented with the opportunity to register to vote within their scheduled medical appointments. Participants were administered a follow-up survey via telephone or within scheduled visits after the 2018 midterm election.

RESULTS

Eighteen of 41 participants (43.9%) who registered to vote in this clinic voted in the midterm elections, and 52 of 95 eligible participants (54.7%) voted overall. Those who did not vote cited multiple issues associated with social determinants of health, including economic stability and neighborhood and social environments, as top barriers.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that facilitating access to voter registration in an adolescent primary care setting is a feasible intervention and may improve voter engagement in youth.

摘要

目的

我们旨在通过在初级保健环境中提供选民登记服务来弥合青年选民登记的途径,并研究这一干预措施对选民参与度以及已登记青年选民投票率的障碍的影响。

方法

共有 120 名符合条件的青年在预约的医疗就诊期间有机会登记投票。在 2018 年中期选举之后,参与者通过电话或在预约就诊时接受了后续调查。

结果

在该诊所登记投票的 41 名参与者中有 18 人(43.9%)在中期选举中投票,而 95 名符合条件的参与者中有 52 人(54.7%)总体上投票。未投票的人提到了与健康的社会决定因素相关的多个问题,包括经济稳定以及邻里和社会环境,这些是最大的障碍。

结论

这项研究表明,在青少年初级保健环境中促进选民登记的获取是一项可行的干预措施,并且可以提高青年的选民参与度。

相似文献

1
Voter Registration and Engagement in an Adolescent and Young Adult Primary Care Clinic.青少年和青年初级保健诊所中的选民登记和参与。
J Adolesc Health. 2020 Jun;66(6):747-749. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.11.316. Epub 2020 Jan 25.
2
Increasing Voter Participation Through Health Care-Based Voter Registration.通过医疗保健为选民登记提高选民参与度。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Jun 7;5(6):e241563. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.1563.
3
Results of a voter registration project at 2 family medicine residency clinics in the Bronx, New York.纽约布朗克斯区两家家庭医学住院医师诊所选民登记项目的结果。
Ann Fam Med. 2014 Sep-Oct;12(5):466-9. doi: 10.1370/afm.1686.
4
Examining Pediatric Residency Voting Practices.考察儿科住院医师投票实践。
South Med J. 2021 Jan;114(1):13-16. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001191.
5
Americans discount the effect of friction on voter turnout.美国人低估了摩擦对投票率的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Aug 23;119(34):e2206072119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2206072119. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
6
Promoting Voter Turnout: an Unanticipated Impact of Early-Childhood Preventive Interventions.提高选民投票率:幼儿预防性干预措施的意外影响。
Prev Sci. 2022 Feb;23(2):192-203. doi: 10.1007/s11121-021-01275-y. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
7
Analysing the relationship between voter turnout and health in Ireland.分析爱尔兰选民投票率与健康之间的关系。
Ir Med J. 2007 Sep;100(8):suppl 56-8.
8
A National Voter Registration Campaign.全国选民登记运动。
Pediatrics. 2023 Aug 1;152(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-059501.
9
The Conditional Effects of Health on Voter Turnout.健康对选民投票率的条件效应。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2021 Jun 1;46(3):409-433. doi: 10.1215/03616878-8893529.
10
Changes and continuities in the determinants of older adults' voter turnout 1952-1996.1952年至1996年美国老年人投票率决定因素的变化与延续性
Gerontologist. 2001 Dec;41(6):805-18. doi: 10.1093/geront/41.6.805.

引用本文的文献

1
Upstream Advocacy: Family Medicine Promotion of Voting.上游倡导:家庭医学对投票的推动
Fam Med. 2024 Oct 16;56(10):620-2. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2024.724313.
2
Empowering Psychiatric Inpatients to Vote: Perceptions of Voting and the Barriers Encountered.赋予精神科住院患者投票权:对投票的看法和遇到的障碍。
Community Ment Health J. 2024 Jul;60(5):885-897. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01241-2. Epub 2024 Mar 2.
3
Expanding voter registration to clinical settings to improve health equity.将选民登记扩展至临床环境以改善健康公平性。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct;58(5):970-975. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14218. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
4
The Healthy Democracy Kit: design, implementation, uptake, and impact of a novel voter registration toolkit for healthcare settings.健康民主工具包:一种新型医疗环境选民登记工具包的设计、实施、采用和影响。
BMC Public Health. 2023 May 26;23(1):962. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15800-x.