• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康民主工具包:一种新型医疗环境选民登记工具包的设计、实施、采用和影响。

The Healthy Democracy Kit: design, implementation, uptake, and impact of a novel voter registration toolkit for healthcare settings.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, The McGaw Medical Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2023 May 26;23(1):962. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15800-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-023-15800-x
PMID:37237346
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10213595/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Access to voting is increasingly recognized as a social determinant of health. Health equity could be improved if healthcare workers (HCWs) routinely assessed the voter registration status of patients during clinical encounters and helped direct them towards appropriate resources. However, little consensus exists on how to achieve these tasks efficiently and effectively in healthcare settings. Intuitive and scalable tools that minimize workflow disruptions are needed. The Healthy Democracy Kit (HDK) is a novel voter registration toolkit for healthcare settings, featuring a wearable badge and posters that display quick response (QR) and text codes directing patients to an online hub for voter registration and mail-in ballot requests. The objective of this study was to assess national uptake and impact of the HDK prior to the 2020 United States (US) elections.

METHODS

Between 19 May and 3 November 2020, HCWs and institutions could order and use HDKs to help direct patients to resources, free of cost. A descriptive analysis was conducted to summarize the characteristics of participating HCWs and institutions as well as the resultant total persons helped prepare to vote.

RESULTS

During the study period, 13,192 HCWs (including 7,554 physicians, 2,209 medical students, and 983 nurses) from 2,407 affiliated institutions across the US ordered 24,031 individual HDKs. Representatives from 604 institutions (including 269 academic medical centers, 111 medical schools, and 141 Federally Qualified Health Centers) ordered 960 institutional HDKs. Collectively, HCWs and institutions from all 50 US states and the District of Columbia used HDKs to help initiate 27,317 voter registrations and 17,216 mail-in ballot requests.

CONCLUSIONS

A novel voter registration toolkit had widespread organic uptake and enabled HCWs and institutions to successfully conduct point-of-care civic health advocacy during clinical encounters. This methodology holds promise for future implementation of other types of public health initiatives. Further study is needed to assess downstream voting behaviors from healthcare-based voter registration.

摘要

背景

越来越多的人认识到,投票权是影响健康的一个社会决定因素。如果医疗工作者(HCWs)在临床接触中定期评估患者的选民登记状况,并帮助引导他们使用适当的资源,那么医疗保健领域的健康公平状况可能会得到改善。然而,在医疗保健环境中,如何有效地实现这些任务,目前尚未达成共识。需要一些直观且可扩展的工具来最小化工作流程中断。Healthy Democracy Kit(HDK)是一种新颖的医疗保健环境选民登记工具包,它具有一个可穿戴徽章和海报,上面显示快速响应(QR)和文本代码,将患者引导至在线选民登记和邮件投票请求中心。本研究的目的是在美国 2020 年大选之前评估 HDK 的全国参与度和影响力。

方法

在 2020 年 5 月 19 日至 11 月 3 日期间,医疗保健工作者和机构可以免费订购和使用 HDK 来帮助引导患者使用资源。对参与的医疗保健工作者和机构的特征以及由此帮助准备投票的总人数进行描述性分析。

结果

在研究期间,来自美国 2407 个附属机构的 13192 名 HCWs(包括 7554 名医生、2209 名医学生和 983 名护士)订购了 24031 个个人 HDK。来自 604 个机构(包括 269 个学术医疗中心、111 所医学院和 141 个联邦合格的健康中心)的代表订购了 960 个机构的 HDK。来自美国所有 50 个州和哥伦比亚特区的 HCWs 和机构共使用 HDK 发起了 27317 次选民登记和 17216 次邮件投票请求。

结论

一种新颖的选民登记工具包得到了广泛的自发采用,并使医疗保健工作者和机构能够在临床接触中成功地进行即时的公民健康宣传。这种方法为未来实施其他类型的公共卫生倡议提供了希望。需要进一步研究来评估基于医疗保健的选民登记对投票行为的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d52/10214593/56b0cad47d62/12889_2023_15800_Figb_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d52/10214593/be83fa03fe80/12889_2023_15800_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d52/10214593/fa6dabadea35/12889_2023_15800_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d52/10214593/99be4eb698af/12889_2023_15800_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d52/10214593/951934cf9829/12889_2023_15800_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d52/10214593/93da57686f40/12889_2023_15800_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d52/10214593/56b0cad47d62/12889_2023_15800_Figb_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d52/10214593/be83fa03fe80/12889_2023_15800_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d52/10214593/fa6dabadea35/12889_2023_15800_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d52/10214593/99be4eb698af/12889_2023_15800_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d52/10214593/951934cf9829/12889_2023_15800_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d52/10214593/93da57686f40/12889_2023_15800_Figa_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3d52/10214593/56b0cad47d62/12889_2023_15800_Figb_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The Healthy Democracy Kit: design, implementation, uptake, and impact of a novel voter registration toolkit for healthcare settings.健康民主工具包:一种新型医疗环境选民登记工具包的设计、实施、采用和影响。
BMC Public Health. 2023 May 26;23(1):962. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15800-x.
2
The Vot-ER Healthy Democracy Campaign: A National Medical Student Competition to Increase Voting Access.Vot-ER 健康民主运动:一项全国医学生竞赛,旨在增加投票机会。
Acad Med. 2022 Jan 1;97(1):89-92. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004381.
3
Increasing Voter Participation Through Health Care-Based Voter Registration.通过医疗保健为选民登记提高选民参与度。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Jun 7;5(6):e241563. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.1563.
4
A National Voter Registration Campaign.全国选民登记运动。
Pediatrics. 2023 Aug 1;152(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-059501.
5
What are the attitudes of medical students and housestaff towards health advocacy? A physician-led voter registration initiative and health advocacy survey.医学生和住院医生对健康宣传的态度是怎样的?一项由医生主导的选民登记倡议及健康宣传调查。
Am J Med Open. 2022 Sep 3;8:100023. doi: 10.1016/j.ajmo.2022.100023. eCollection 2022 Dec.
6
Promoting Health Equity Through Voter Support Activities for the Inpatient Psychiatric Population.通过支持住院精神病人的选民活动促进健康公平。
Community Ment Health J. 2023 Apr;59(3):498-506. doi: 10.1007/s10597-022-01033-6. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
7
Climate crisis, health equity, and democratic governance: the need to act together.气候危机、健康公平和民主治理:需要共同行动。
J Public Health Policy. 2020 Mar;41(1):4-10. doi: 10.1057/s41271-019-00209-x.
8
Addressing Health Disparities Through Voter Engagement.通过选民参与解决健康不平等问题。
Ann Fam Med. 2019 Sep;17(5):459-461. doi: 10.1370/afm.2441.
9
Voter Participation Is a Path to Health Equity: How Health Departments Can Promote a Healthy, Inclusive Democracy.选民参与是实现健康公平的途径:卫生部门如何促进健康、包容的民主。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2024;30(2):306-307. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001886.
10
Ensuring Equitable Access to Participation in the Electoral Process: A Policy Brief From the American College of Physicians.确保公平参与选举过程:美国医师学院政策简报。
Ann Intern Med. 2024 Jan;177(1):68-69. doi: 10.7326/M23-2293. Epub 2023 Dec 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Residents Vote! A Framework and Toolkit to Improve Resident Voting Rates.居民投票!提高居民投票率的框架与工具包。
J Grad Med Educ. 2025 Feb;17(1):96-100. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-24-00509.1. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
2
The relationship between the lifestyle health index and voter turnout during the 2020 United States presidential election in the context of regional cultures.在区域文化背景下,2020年美国总统大选期间生活方式健康指数与选民投票率之间的关系。
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2024 Aug 15;8:100534. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100534. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Increasing Voter Participation Through Health Care-Based Voter Registration.

本文引用的文献

1
A National Voter Registration Campaign.全国选民登记运动。
Pediatrics. 2023 Aug 1;152(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2022-059501.
2
Why and How Civic Health Should Be Incorporated Into Medical Education.为何以及如何将公民健康纳入医学教育。
Acad Med. 2022 Dec 1;97(12):1760-1764. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004765. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
3
Analysis of Reported Voting Behaviors of US Physicians, 2000-2020.分析 2000-2020 年美国医生的投票行为报告
通过医疗保健为选民登记提高选民参与度。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Jun 7;5(6):e241563. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.1563.
4
Empowering Psychiatric Inpatients to Vote: Perceptions of Voting and the Barriers Encountered.赋予精神科住院患者投票权:对投票的看法和遇到的障碍。
Community Ment Health J. 2024 Jul;60(5):885-897. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01241-2. Epub 2024 Mar 2.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2142527. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.42527.
4
The Vot-ER Healthy Democracy Campaign: A National Medical Student Competition to Increase Voting Access.Vot-ER 健康民主运动:一项全国医学生竞赛,旨在增加投票机会。
Acad Med. 2022 Jan 1;97(1):89-92. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004381.
5
Health care-based voter registration: a new kind of healing.基于医疗保健的选民登记:一种新型的治愈方式。
Int J Emerg Med. 2021 Apr 30;14(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12245-021-00351-y.
6
Voting, health and interventions in healthcare settings: a scoping review.投票、健康与医疗环境中的干预措施:一项范围综述
Public Health Rev. 2020 Jul 1;41:16. doi: 10.1186/s40985-020-00133-6. eCollection 2020.
7
Voter Registration and Engagement in an Adolescent and Young Adult Primary Care Clinic.青少年和青年初级保健诊所中的选民登记和参与。
J Adolesc Health. 2020 Jun;66(6):747-749. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.11.316. Epub 2020 Jan 25.
8
Addressing Health Disparities Through Voter Engagement.通过选民参与解决健康不平等问题。
Ann Fam Med. 2019 Sep;17(5):459-461. doi: 10.1370/afm.2441.
9
Health disparities, politics, and the maintenance of the status quo: A new theory of inequality.健康差异、政治和维持现状:一种新的不平等理论。
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Mar;200:36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.01.010. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
10
Black lives matter: Differential mortality and the racial composition of the U.S. electorate, 1970-2004.黑人的命也是命:1970年至2004年美国选民中的死亡率差异与种族构成
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Jul;136-137:193-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.04.014. Epub 2015 Apr 21.