Doheny Image Reading Center, Doheny Eye Institute, 1350 San Pablo St., Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA.
Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr;258(4):725-733. doi: 10.1007/s00417-020-04607-w. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
To analyze the distribution of diabetic retinopathy (DR) lesions in an Indian population using ultra-wide field (UWF) fundus imaging.
Seven hundred fifteen subjects (1406 eyes) with diabetic retinopathy in India were enrolled in this multicenter, prospective, observational study using UWF pseudocolor imaging with Optos Daytona Plus (Optos plc, Dunfermline, Scotland, UK). Images were transmitted to Doheny Image Reading Center, Los Angeles, CA, for grading. The ETDRS grid was overlaid on stereographic projections of UWF images, and images were graded independently by 2 masked graders. Lesion distribution was graded as predominantly central (PCL) or predominantly peripheral (PPL) according to previous criteria, considering both lesion number and area. An image was graded as PPL if > 50% of the lesion area was seen in at least one peripheral field as compared with the corresponding ETDRS field. Diabetic retinopathy severity was also assessed based on the International Classification of Diabetic Retinopathy (ICDR) grading scale. The main outcome measures were lesion distribution (PPL versus PCL): overall and within specific fields in eyes with various grades of DR.
Lesion distribution was rated to be PPL in 37% of eyes and PCL in 63% of eyes (P < 0.003). The frequency of a PPL distribution varied significantly across all ICDR severity levels, with frequencies of mild non-proliferative DR (NPDR) (30.9%), moderate NPDR (40.3%), severe NPDR (38.5%) and PDR (34.9%), P = 0.005. When assessing which individual fields were rated to show a PPL distribution, the frequency was greatest in field 4 and least in field 7. For any grade of DR, temporal fields showed the greatest PPL frequency, followed in order by the superior, inferior, and nasal fields (P < 0.001). Only 3.5% of eyes showed PPL distribution in all five peripheral fields.
One-third of the UWF images showed a PPL distribution in this cohort with the temporal quadrant having the widest distribution of PPL. As the PPL distribution varied significantly between various grades of DR, UWF imaging may prove to be important for screening of referral warranted retinopathy.
使用超广角(UWF)眼底成像分析印度人群中糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)病变的分布。
本多中心、前瞻性、观察性研究共纳入了 715 名(1406 只眼)患有糖尿病视网膜病变的印度患者,使用 Optos Daytona Plus(英国邓弗姆林 Optos plc)进行超广角伪彩成像。图像传输至加利福尼亚州洛杉矶的 Doheny 图像阅读中心进行分级。ETDRS 网格叠加在 UWF 图像的立体投影上,由 2 名盲法分级员独立进行分级。根据先前的标准,考虑病变数量和面积,将病变分布分为主要为中央(PCL)或主要为周边(PPL)。如果与相应的 ETDRS 视野相比,至少一个周边视野中看到的病变面积超过 50%,则将图像分级为 PPL。还根据国际糖尿病视网膜病变分级(ICDR)分级量表评估糖尿病视网膜病变的严重程度。主要观察指标为病变分布(PPL 与 PCL):在各种 DR 分级眼中的总体和特定视野中的分布情况。
37%的眼为 PPL 分布,63%的眼为 PCL 分布(P<0.003)。在所有 ICDR 严重程度水平中,PPL 分布的频率差异均具有统计学意义,轻度非增殖性糖尿病视网膜病变(NPDR)(30.9%)、中度 NPDR(40.3%)、重度 NPDR(38.5%)和 PDR(34.9%)的频率差异均具有统计学意义,P=0.005。在评估哪些特定视野被评定为 PPL 分布时,第 4 象限的频率最高,第 7 象限的频率最低。对于任何等级的 DR,颞侧视野的 PPL 频率最高,其次是上侧、下侧和鼻侧视野(P<0.001)。仅有 3.5%的眼在所有 5 个周边视野中均显示 PPL 分布。
在该队列中,有三分之一的 UWF 图像显示 PPL 分布,颞象限的 PPL 分布最广泛。由于 PPL 分布在不同等级的 DR 之间存在显著差异,UWF 成像可能对筛查需要转诊的视网膜病变具有重要意义。