Suppr超能文献

重症监护病房非药物干预的止痛效果:范围综述。

Pain relief from nonpharmacological interventions in the intensive care unit: A scoping review.

机构信息

Departement of Health and Caring Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.

Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Elderly and Nursing Home Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

J Clin Nurs. 2020 May;29(9-10):1488-1498. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15194. Epub 2020 Feb 7.

Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To describe what is known from the existing literature on nonpharmacological interventions targeting pain in patients admitted to the ICU.

BACKGROUND

Patients receiving intensive care nursing are exposed to a wide range of pain provoking tissue damage, diseases, surgery and other medical procedures in addition to the pain caused by nursing care procedures. The present shift to light sedation to improve patient outcomes and comfort underscores the need for effective pain management. Opioids are the mainstay for treating pain in the ICUs, whereas nonpharmacological treatments are understudied and possibly under-used.

METHOD

A scoping review was undertaken using five of the six steps in the Arksey and O´Malley framework: (a) identification of the research question, (b) identification of relevant studies, (c) study selection, (d) charting the data and (e) collating, summarising and reporting the results. CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, BMJ Best Practice, British Nursing Index and AMED databases were searched using relevant keywords to capture extensive evidence. Data were analysed using the six-step criteria for scoping reviews suggested by Arksey and O´Malley for data extraction. To ensure quality and transparency, we enclosed the relevant Equator checklist PRISMA.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 10,985 articles of which 12 studies were included. Tools for pain assessments were VAS, NRS, ESAS and BPS. Interventions explored were hypnosis, simple massage, distraction, relaxation, spiritual care, harp music, music therapy, listening to natural sounds, passive exercise, acupuncture, ice packs and emotional support. Reduction in pain intensity was conferred for hypnosis, acupuncture and natural sounds.

CONCLUSION

The findings support further investigations of acupuncture, hypnosis and listening to natural sounds.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The main finding suggests the use of comprehensive multimodal interventions to investigate the effects of nonpharmacological treatment protocols on pain intensity, pain proportion and the impact on opioid consumption and sedation requirements.

摘要

目的和目标

描述现有文献中针对 ICU 患者疼痛的非药物干预措施。

背景

接受重症监护护理的患者除了接受护理程序引起的疼痛外,还会受到广泛的引起疼痛的组织损伤、疾病、手术和其他医疗程序的影响。目前,为了改善患者的转归和舒适度,转向轻度镇静,这突显了有效疼痛管理的必要性。阿片类药物是治疗 ICU 疼痛的主要药物,而非药物治疗的研究较少,可能使用不足。

方法

采用 Arksey 和 O´Malley 框架的六个步骤中的五个步骤进行了范围综述:(a)确定研究问题,(b)确定相关研究,(c)研究选择,(d)数据图表和(e)整理、总结和报告结果。使用相关关键词在 CINAHL、MEDLINE、PubMed、BMJ Best Practice、英国护理索引和 AMED 数据库中搜索,以捕获广泛的证据。使用 Arksey 和 O´Malley 提出的用于数据提取的范围综述的六个步骤标准对数据进行分析。为了确保质量和透明度,我们附上了相关的 EQUATOR 清单 PRISMA。

结果

我们的搜索结果产生了 10985 篇文章,其中 12 项研究被纳入。疼痛评估工具包括 VAS、NRS、ESAS 和 BPS。探索的干预措施包括催眠、简单按摩、分散注意力、放松、精神关怀、竖琴音乐、音乐疗法、听自然声音、被动运动、针灸、冰袋和情感支持。催眠、针灸和自然声音可以减轻疼痛强度。

结论

这些发现支持进一步调查针灸、催眠和听自然声音。

临床意义

主要发现表明,使用综合多模式干预措施来调查非药物治疗方案对疼痛强度、疼痛比例以及对阿片类药物消耗和镇静需求的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验