Suppr超能文献

经尿道钬激光前列腺剜除术(120-W 钬激光,VelaXL)与双极经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)治疗老年男性前列腺增生的临床疗效比较。

Clinical outcome of transurethral enucleation of the prostate using the 120-W thulium Laser (Vela™ XL) compared to bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in aging male.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taiwan, Republic of China.

School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taiwan, Republic of China.

出版信息

Aging (Albany NY). 2020 Jan 28;12(2):1888-1898. doi: 10.18632/aging.102720.

Abstract

This study compared the surgical outcomes of the 120-W Thulium laser (Vela™ XL) enucleation of the prostate and bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in terms of efficacy, safety, and improvements of quality of life (QoL) in patients with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). Records were obtained from January 2014 to September 2018 for selected patients with symptomatic BPH who underwent 120-W Thulium laser (Vela™XL) prostate enucleation and bipolar TURP in our institution. All the patients selected met the surgical criteria for TURP and had received medical treatment for at least 3 months. Patients were excluded if their ECOG performance status was >1, if they had active malignant disease, of if they had a history of prostate surgery or reconstruction surgery of the urinary system. Patients decided which treatment option would be performed. Both the procedures were conducted by a single surgeon. Clinical outcomes such as changes in the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) score, urodynamic parameters, drug consumption, pain scores, and QoL were evaluated. The rate of urinary tract infection, recatheterization, additional analgesic requirement, return to the emergency department for treatment, and other surgical complications was analyzed and compared between the two cohorts. A total of 276 patients met the inclusion criteria. Among them, 141 patients received bipolar TURP, where as 135 decided to receive laser vaporesection. No significant difference was observed in age, PSA level, prostate volume, and comorbidities between the two cohorts. Pre-operative (pre-op) urodynamic parameters were also identical, except that the laser surgery group had a higher rate of admission with a urinary catheter (24.4% . 14.2%, =0.044). The operating time was longer in the laser surgery group (79.3 minutes 62.4 minutes, <0.001). However, enucleation using the Thulium laser was superior to bipolar TURP in terms of post-operative (post-op) pain status, including the numeric rating scale of pain, rate of additional narcotic use, and oral analgesic requirement. Compared with bipolar TURP, laser enucleation achieved a higher improvement in the QoL score at post-op follow-up at 2 weeks and 3 months. Nevertheless, the complication rate, changes in IPSS score, Qmax, and post-op medication-free survival were statistically identical in the two cohorts. Our data revealed that compared with bipolar TURP, 120-W Thulium laser (Vela™ XL) enucleation of the prostate achieved lower post-op pain and higher improvement in the short-term QoL of patients after surgery.

摘要

这项研究比较了 120W 钬激光(VelaXL)前列腺剜除术和双极经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)在疗效、安全性和改善良性前列腺增生(BPH)患者生活质量(QoL)方面的差异。记录了 2014 年 1 月至 2018 年 9 月期间在我们机构接受 120W 钬激光(VelaXL)前列腺剜除术和双极 TURP 的有症状 BPH 患者的手术结果。所有入选的患者均符合 TURP 的手术标准,且至少接受了 3 个月的药物治疗。如果患者 ECOG 表现状态>1,如果他们患有活动性恶性疾病,或者如果他们有前列腺手术或泌尿系统重建手术史,则将其排除在外。患者决定选择哪种治疗方案。两种手术均由一位外科医生进行。评估了国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)评分、尿动力学参数、药物使用、疼痛评分和 QoL 的变化等临床结果。分析比较了两组患者尿路感染、重新导尿、额外镇痛需求、因治疗返回急诊室和其他手术并发症的发生率。共有 276 名患者符合纳入标准。其中,141 名患者接受了双极 TURP,135 名患者决定接受激光汽化切除术。两组患者的年龄、PSA 水平、前列腺体积和合并症无显著差异。术前(术前)尿动力学参数也相同,只是激光手术组的导尿管入院率较高(24.4%比 14.2%,=0.044)。激光手术组的手术时间较长(79.3 分钟比 62.4 分钟,<0.001)。然而,与双极 TURP 相比,钬激光前列腺剜除术在术后(术后)疼痛状况方面具有优势,包括疼痛数字评分量表、额外使用麻醉药物的比率和口服镇痛药物的需求。与双极 TURP 相比,激光剜除术在术后 2 周和 3 个月时在 QoL 评分方面的改善更高。然而,两组的并发症发生率、IPSS 评分、Qmax 和术后无药物生存情况的变化在统计学上是相同的。我们的数据显示,与双极 TURP 相比,120W 钬激光(VelaXL)前列腺剜除术可降低术后疼痛,并在短期内提高术后患者的生活质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95c6/7053585/d2052706a8c0/aging-12-102720-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验