Suppr超能文献

高流量鼻导管给儿科呼吸窘迫患者输送雾化支气管扩张剂的可行性。

Feasibility of Aerosol Bronchodilators Delivery Through High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Pediatric Subjects With Respiratory Distress.

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, American Family Children's Hospital, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.

Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Richmond at VCU, Richmond, Virginia.

出版信息

Respir Care. 2020 Oct;65(10):1464-1469. doi: 10.4187/respcare.07147. Epub 2020 Jan 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is commonly used to provide respiratory support to pediatric patients with respiratory failure. Although the use of bronchodilators via HFNC has been described, the feasibility and safety of aerosolized bronchodilator delivery via HFNC are controversial. In this study, we sought to evaluate whether the HFNC system can be used to deliver nebulized bronchodilators at lower gas flow of 2-4 L/min, increase patient comfort, and minimize respiratory therapist (RT) bedside time when compared to traditional interfaces.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all pediatric subjects who were admitted to the pediatric ICU in a tertiary care children's hospital and required nebulized bronchodilators between December 2017 and June 2018.

RESULTS

A total of 205 nebulizations were administered to 28 children; 31% of nebulized bronchodilators were given using a nebulization system integrated into the HFNC. Nebulized treatments resulted in an average increase in heart rate of 9.98 (95% CI 3.72-16.2) beats/min when HFNC was used and 0.64 (95% CI -1.65 to 2.93) beats/min when traditional interfaces were used, a difference of 9.34 (95% CI 2.30-16.4) beats/min ( < .001). RT bedside time was significantly longer for HFNC nebulized treatments ( = .031). Subjective level of comfort was not statically different when nebulized bronchodilators were delivered via HFNC or via traditional interfaces. Length of pediatric ICU stay was not statistically different between subjects who received some aerosol nebulized bronchodilators via HFNC versus those who received all bronchodilators through traditional interfaces ( = .11).

CONCLUSIONS

Aerosol bronchodilator delivery using HFNC is feasible at low gas flow (ie, 2-4 L/min). However, the use of HFNC did not improve subjects' comfort, and it increased RT bedside time. Further prospective randomized studies are needed to determine the efficacy and efficiency of aerosol therapy delivered through HFNC and potential patient-oriented outcomes.

摘要

背景

高流量鼻导管(HFNC)常用于为呼吸衰竭的儿科患者提供呼吸支持。虽然已经描述了通过 HFNC 使用支气管扩张剂,但通过 HFNC 输送雾化支气管扩张剂的可行性和安全性仍存在争议。在这项研究中,我们试图评估 HFNC 系统是否可以在低气体流量为 2-4 L/min 时输送雾化支气管扩张剂,提高患者舒适度,并减少呼吸治疗师(RT)的床边时间,与传统接口相比。

方法

对 2017 年 12 月至 2018 年 6 月期间在一家三级儿童医院儿科重症监护病房住院并需要雾化支气管扩张剂的所有儿科患者的回顾性图表进行回顾。

结果

共向 28 名儿童给予 205 次雾化治疗;31%的雾化支气管扩张剂是通过集成到 HFNC 中的雾化系统给予的。当使用 HFNC 时,雾化治疗导致平均心率增加 9.98 次/分(95%置信区间 3.72-16.2),当使用传统接口时增加 0.64 次/分(95%置信区间-1.65 至 2.93),差异为 9.34 次/分(95%置信区间 2.30-16.4)(<.001)。HFNC 雾化治疗的 RT 床边时间明显更长(=.031)。当通过 HFNC 或通过传统接口输送雾化支气管扩张剂时,舒适度的主观水平没有统计学差异。通过 HFNC 接受一些雾化支气管扩张剂的患者与通过传统接口接受所有支气管扩张剂的患者的儿科 ICU 住院时间无统计学差异(=.11)。

结论

在低气体流量(即 2-4 L/min)下,HFNC 可实现气溶胶支气管扩张剂输送。然而,HFNC 的使用并未改善患者的舒适度,反而增加了 RT 的床边时间。需要进一步进行前瞻性随机研究,以确定通过 HFNC 输送气溶胶治疗的疗效和效率,以及潜在的以患者为导向的结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验