Suppr超能文献

儿童静脉-静脉体外膜肺氧合时的机械通气。

Mechanical Ventilation in Children on Venovenous ECMO.

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Riley Hospital for Children, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana.

Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

出版信息

Respir Care. 2020 Mar;65(3):271-280. doi: 10.4187/respcare.07214. Epub 2020 Jan 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is used when mechanical ventilation can no longer support oxygenation or ventilation, or if the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury is considered excessive. The optimum mechanical ventilation strategy once on ECMO is unknown. We sought to describe the practice of mechanical ventilation in children on VV-ECMO and to determine whether mechanical ventilation practices are associated with clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study in 10 pediatric academic centers in the United States. Children age 14 d through 18 y on VV-ECMO from 2011 to 2016 were included. Exclusion criteria were preexisting chronic respiratory failure, primary diagnosis of asthma, cyanotic heart disease, or ECMO as a bridge to lung transplant.

RESULTS

Conventional mechanical ventilation was used in about 75% of children on VV-ECMO; the remaining subjects were managed with a variety of approaches. With the exception of PEEP, there was large variation in ventilator settings. Ventilator mode and pressure settings were not associated with survival. Mean ventilator F on days 1-3 was higher in nonsurvivors than in survivors (0.5 vs 0.4, = .009). In univariate analysis, other risk factors for mortality were female gender, higher Pediatric Risk Estimate Score for Children Using Extracorporeal Respiratory Support (Ped-RESCUERS), diagnosis of cancer or stem cell transplant, and number of days intubated prior to initiation of ECMO (all < .05). In multivariate analysis, ventilator F was significantly associated with mortality (odds ratio 1.38 for each 0.1 increase in F , 95% CI 1.09-1.75). Mortality was higher in subjects on high ventilator F (≥ 0.5) compared to low ventilator F (> 0.5) (46% vs 22%, = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Ventilator mode and some settings vary in practice. The only ventilator setting associated with mortality was F , even after adjustment for disease severity. Ventilator F is a modifiable setting that may contribute to mortality in children on VV-ECMO.

摘要

背景

当机械通气无法再支持氧合或通气,或者认为呼吸机引起的肺损伤风险过高时,会使用静脉-静脉体外膜肺氧合(VV-ECMO)。在 ECMO 上的最佳机械通气策略尚不清楚。我们旨在描述儿童 VV-ECMO 上的机械通气实践,并确定机械通气实践是否与临床结果相关。

方法

我们在美国 10 家儿科学术中心进行了一项多中心回顾性队列研究。纳入 2011 年至 2016 年 VV-ECMO 上年龄在 14 天至 18 岁的儿童。排除标准为:存在慢性呼吸衰竭、哮喘的主要诊断、紫绀性心脏病或 ECMO 作为肺移植的桥接。

结果

约 75%的 VV-ECMO 患儿接受了常规机械通气;其余患儿接受了各种方法的治疗。除 PEEP 外,呼吸机设置存在很大差异。通气模式和压力设置与存活率无关。与幸存者相比,非幸存者在第 1-3 天的呼吸机 F 值更高(0.5 比 0.4, =.009)。在单变量分析中,死亡率的其他危险因素为女性、更高的儿童体外呼吸支持使用的儿科风险估计评分(Ped-RESCUERS)、癌症或干细胞移植的诊断以及 ECMO 启动前插管的天数(均 <.05)。在多变量分析中,呼吸机 F 与死亡率显著相关(F 每增加 0.1,死亡率的比值比为 1.38,95%CI 为 1.09-1.75)。与低呼吸机 F (> 0.5)相比,高呼吸机 F (≥ 0.5)患儿的死亡率更高(46%比 22%, =.001)。

结论

通气模式和某些设置在实践中存在差异。唯一与死亡率相关的呼吸机设置是 F ,即使在调整疾病严重程度后也是如此。呼吸机 F 是一个可调节的设置,可能导致 VV-ECMO 上的儿童死亡。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验