Musharaf Iram, Daspal Sibasis, Shatzer John
Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Johns Hopkins University School of Education, Baltimore, Maryland.
AJP Rep. 2020 Jan;10(1):e5-e10. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3400970. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
Endotracheal intubation is a skill required for resuscitation. Due to various reasons, intubation opportunities are decreasing for health care providers. To compare the success rate of video laryngoscopy (VL) and direct laryngoscopy (DL) for interprofessional neonatal intubation skills in a simulated setting. This was a prospective nonrandomized simulation crossover trial. Twenty-six participants were divided into three groups based on their frequency of intubation. Group 1 included pediatric residents; group 2 respiratory therapists and transport nurses; and group 3 neonatal nurse practitioners and physicians working in neonatology. We compared intubation success rate, intubation time, and laryngoscope preference. Success rates were 100% for both DL and VL in groups 1 and 2, and 88.9% for DL and 100% for VL in group 3. Median intubation times for DL and VL were 22 seconds (interquartile range [IQR] 14.3-22.8 seconds) and 12.5 seconds (IQR 10.3-38.8 seconds) in group 1 ( = 0.779); 17 seconds (IQR 8-21 seconds) and 12 seconds (IQR 9-16.5 seconds) in group 2 ( = 0.476); and 11 seconds (IQR 7.5-15.5 seconds) and 15 seconds (IQR 11.5-36 seconds) in group 3 ( = 0.024). We conclude that novice providers tend to perform better with VL, while more experienced providers perform better with DL. In this era of decreased clinical training opportunities, VL may serve as a useful tool to teach residents and other novice health care providers.
气管插管是复苏所需的一项技能。由于各种原因,医护人员进行插管操作的机会正在减少。为了在模拟环境中比较视频喉镜(VL)和直接喉镜(DL)用于跨专业新生儿插管技能的成功率。这是一项前瞻性非随机模拟交叉试验。26名参与者根据其插管频率分为三组。第1组包括儿科住院医师;第2组包括呼吸治疗师和转运护士;第3组包括新生儿执业护士和新生儿科医生。我们比较了插管成功率、插管时间和喉镜偏好。第1组和第2组中DL和VL的成功率均为100%,第3组中DL的成功率为88.9%,VL的成功率为100%。第1组中DL和VL的插管中位时间分别为22秒(四分位间距[IQR]14.3 - 22.8秒)和12.5秒(IQR 10.3 - 38.8秒)(P = 0.779);第2组中分别为17秒(IQR 8 - 21秒)和12秒(IQR 9 - 16.5秒)(P = 0.476);第3组中分别为11秒(IQR 7.5 - 15.5秒)和15秒(IQR 11.5 - 36秒)(P = 0.024)。我们得出结论,新手医护人员使用VL往往表现更好,而经验更丰富的医护人员使用DL表现更好。在这个临床培训机会减少的时代,VL可能是教导住院医师和其他新手医护人员的有用工具。