Department of Emergency Medicine, School of medicine, Konkuk University, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Emergency Medicine, School of medicine, Konkuk University, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Resuscitation. 2015 Apr;89:188-94. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.12.010. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
To compare the first-attempt success in endotracheal intubation (ETI) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) using direct laryngoscopy (DL) and video laryngoscopy (VL) (GlideScope(®)) among novice emergency physicians (EPs).
This study is a historically controlled clinical design. From May 2011 to April 2013 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients were intubated during CPR by novice EPs. CPR data was automatically recorded by pre-installed video and subsequently analysed. The primary outcome was the success rate of the first-attempt at ETI. In addition, time to successful ETI from first-attempt (T-complete), duration of chest compression interruptions, and incidence of oesophageal intubation were compared.
Of 305 patients undergoing ETI, 83 were intubated by novice EPs. The success rate of first-attempt ETI in the VL group (n=49) was higher than that in the DL group (n=34, 91.8% vs. 55.9%; p<0.001). The median T-complete was significantly shorter with VL than with DL (37 [29-55] vs. 62 [56-110] s; p<0.001). Oesophageal intubation was observed only in the DL group (n=6, 17.6%). The median duration of chest compression interruptions was greater with DL (7 [3-6] s) than with VL (0 [0-0] s). Improvements in ETI during CPR were observed in the VL group after the first 3 months, but not the DL group during regular use for 1 year.
For novice EPs, the VL could significantly improve the first-attempt success in ETI during CPR while the DL couldn't improve it.
比较新手急救医师在心肺复苏(CPR)期间使用直接喉镜(DL)和视频喉镜(VL)(GlideScope®)行气管插管的首次尝试成功率。
这是一项历史对照临床设计研究。2011 年 5 月至 2013 年 4 月,由新手急救医师对院外心脏骤停患者行 CPR 时进行气管插管。CPR 数据由预安装的视频自动记录,随后进行分析。主要结局是首次尝试气管插管的成功率。此外,还比较了首次尝试成功的时间(T-complete)、胸外按压中断时间以及食管插管的发生率。
在 305 例行气管插管的患者中,有 83 例由新手急救医师进行插管。VL 组(n=49)首次尝试气管插管的成功率高于 DL 组(n=34,91.8% vs. 55.9%;p<0.001)。VL 组的 T-complete 中位数明显短于 DL 组(37 [29-55] vs. 62 [56-110] s;p<0.001)。仅在 DL 组(n=6,17.6%)观察到食管插管。DL 组的胸外按压中断时间中位数(7 [3-6] s)大于 VL 组(0 [0-0] s)。在 VL 组,首次 3 个月后观察到 CPR 期间气管插管的改善,但在 DL 组 1 年的常规使用中未观察到改善。
对于新手急救医师来说,VL 可显著提高 CPR 期间气管插管的首次尝试成功率,而 DL 则不能提高成功率。