Faes Theo J C, Meer Romain, Heyndrickx Guy R, Kerkhof Peter L M
Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Cardiovascular Center, Aalst, Belgium.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Jan 14;6:189. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2019.00189. eCollection 2019.
Coronary arterial stenosis may impair myocardial perfusion with myocardial ischemia and associated morbidity and mortality as result. The myocardial fractional flow reserve () is clinically used as a stenosis-specific index. This study aims to identify the relation between the and the degree of coronary arterial stenosis using a simple mathematical model of the coronary circulation. A mathematical model of the coronary circulation, including an arterial stenosis of variable degree, was developed. The relation between the and the degree of stenosis (defined as the fractional cross sectional area narrowing) was investigated, including the influence of the aortic and venous pressures and the capillary resistance. An additional study concerning 22 patients with coronary artery disease permits comparison of clinical data and findings. The shows an S-shaped relationship with the stenosis index. We found a marked influence of venous and aortic pressure and capillary resistance. The is accompanied by a clinically relevant co-metric ( ), defined by the Pythagorean sum of the two pressures in the definition formula for . In the patient group the is strongly related to the post-stenotic pressure ( = 0.91). The requires establishment of a validated cut-off point using future trials. The S-shaped dependence of on the severity of the stenosis makes the a measure of the ordinal scale. The marked influences of the aortic and venous pressures and the capillary resistance on the will be interpreted as significant variations in intra- and inter-individual clinical findings. These fluctuations are partly connected to the neglect of considering the . At otherwise identical conditions the as measured at baseline differs from the value obtained during hyperemic conditions. This expected observation requires further investigation, as the current hyperemia based evaluation fails to take advantage of available baseline data.
冠状动脉狭窄可能会损害心肌灌注,导致心肌缺血以及相关的发病率和死亡率。心肌血流储备分数(FFR)在临床上用作特定狭窄指标。本研究旨在使用冠状动脉循环的简单数学模型来确定FFR与冠状动脉狭窄程度之间的关系。建立了一个冠状动脉循环数学模型,其中包括不同程度的动脉狭窄。研究了FFR与狭窄程度(定义为横截面积缩小分数)之间的关系,包括主动脉压、静脉压和毛细血管阻力的影响。另一项针对22例冠心病患者的研究允许对临床数据和FFR结果进行比较。FFR与狭窄指数呈S形关系。我们发现静脉压、主动脉压和毛细血管阻力有显著影响。FFR伴随着一个临床相关的共同指标(CFR),它由FFR定义公式中两个压力的勾股和定义。在患者组中,CFR与狭窄后压力密切相关(r = 0.91)。FFR需要通过未来的试验建立一个有效的临界点。FFR对狭窄严重程度的S形依赖性使FFR成为一种顺序量表测量方法。主动脉压、静脉压和毛细血管阻力对FFR的显著影响将被解释为个体内和个体间临床结果的显著差异。这些波动部分与未考虑CFR有关。在其他条件相同的情况下,基线时测量的FFR与充血状态下获得的值不同。这一预期观察结果需要进一步研究,因为目前基于充血的评估未能利用可用的基线数据。