• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

居民的双重利益偏好及其对中国环保行为的影响。

The inhabitants' dual interest preferences and their impact on pro-environmental behavior in China.

机构信息

College of Economics & Management, Northwest A&F University, 3 Taicheng Road, Yangling, 712100, Shaanxi, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Apr;27(11):12308-12319. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-07760-1. Epub 2020 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-020-07760-1
PMID:31993900
Abstract

The land use changes and farmers' unreasonable land use behaviors continue to threaten China's agricultural land, exacerbating the impact of pollution. The factors that persuade farm households to perform pro-environmental actions are preliminary efforts to strengthen environmental protection. The current study aims to better understand how the dual interest preferences of rural households are interrelated and influence their environmental behavior. A structured questionnaire was employed to collect the primary data from 4 provinces in China to develop new methods to measure the dual interest preferences of farmers and to study their impact on pro-environmental behaviors. The structural equation model (SEM) in Stata14 was used to analyze the relationship between latent and observed variables and to understand their impact on farmers' environmental behavior. The results showed that all the observed variables have the expected signs and have a significant relationship with their latent variables. With the coefficients of 0.76, 0.88, and 0.64, the underlying variables related to the households' dual interest preferences are statistically significantly correlated. The coefficient 0.34 of the latent variable ensures a direct and significant impact on farm households' pro-environmental behavior, suggesting that non-uniformity preferences or conflicts exist between the short- and long-term economic interests. Similarly, a positive and significant coefficient of 0.28 suggests the non-uniformity of preferences in short-term economic and social interests. All the fitness indices ensured that our model fits well. To improve the environment and land quality, the current research has policy implications for the adoption of environment-friendly pesticide and organic fertilizers.

摘要

土地利用变化和农民不合理的土地利用行为持续威胁着中国的农业用地,加剧了污染的影响。促使农户采取环保行动的因素是加强环境保护的初步努力。本研究旨在更好地理解农村家庭的双重利益偏好是如何相互关联并影响他们的环境行为的。本研究采用结构问卷从中国的 4 个省份收集了主要数据,以开发新的方法来衡量农民的双重利益偏好,并研究其对环保行为的影响。Stata14 中的结构方程模型(SEM)用于分析潜在变量和观测变量之间的关系,并了解它们对农民环境行为的影响。结果表明,所有观测变量都具有预期的符号,并与其潜在变量有显著关系。与家庭双重利益偏好相关的潜在变量的系数分别为 0.76、0.88 和 0.64,在统计上具有显著相关性。潜在变量对农户环保行为的直接和显著影响系数为 0.34,表明短期和长期经济利益之间存在非一致性偏好或冲突。同样,短期经济和社会利益偏好非一致性的正且显著系数为 0.28。所有拟合指标都确保了我们的模型拟合良好。为了改善环境和土地质量,本研究对采用环保型农药和有机肥具有政策意义。

相似文献

1
The inhabitants' dual interest preferences and their impact on pro-environmental behavior in China.居民的双重利益偏好及其对中国环保行为的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Apr;27(11):12308-12319. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-07760-1. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
2
Urbanization, Land Use Behavior and Land Quality in Rural China: An Analysis Based on Pressure-Response-Impact Framework and SEM Approach.中国农村的城市化、土地利用行为与土地质量:基于压力-响应-影响框架与 SEM 方法的分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Nov 22;15(12):2621. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122621.
3
Hierarchical regression approach to quantify farm households' pro-environmental behavior.层次回归法量化农户的环保行为。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Oct;27(29):36878-36888. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09705-0. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
4
Effect of the grain-growing purpose and farm size on the ability of stable land property rights to encourage farmers to apply organic fertilizers.粮食种植目的和农场规模对稳定土地产权鼓励农民施用有机肥能力的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Dec 1;251:109621. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109621. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
5
Are Farmers in National Park Communities Willing to Reallocate Their Lands? A Situational Analysis.国家公园社区的农民是否愿意重新分配他们的土地?情境分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 14;19(14):8589. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148589.
6
Discussing the regional-scale arable land use intensity and environmental risk triggered by the micro-scale rural households' differentiation based on step-by-step evaluation-a case study of Shandong Province, China.基于递进评价探讨微观尺度农户分化引发的区域尺度耕地利用强度与环境风险——以山东省为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Mar;27(8):8271-8284. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-07537-1. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
7
Land Tenure and Green Production Behavior: Empirical Analysis Based on Fertilizer Use by Cotton Farmers in China.土地产权与绿色生产行为——基于中国棉农化肥使用的实证分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 28;18(9):4677. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094677.
8
Place attachment, environmental cognition and organic fertilizer adoption of farmers: evidence from rural China.农民的地方依恋、环境认知与有机肥采纳——来自中国农村的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Aug;28(30):41255-41267. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13509-1. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
9
Enhancing environmental sustainability in transferred farmlands through rural e-commerce: insights from China.通过农村电子商务提高转移耕地的环境可持续性:来自中国的见解。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Apr;31(17):25388-25405. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-32699-y. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
10
[Ecological compensation based on farmers' willingness: A case study of Jingsan County in Hubei Province, China].基于农民意愿的生态补偿:以中国湖北省京山县为例
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2015 Jan;26(1):215-23.

引用本文的文献

1
The progress and trend of pro-environmental behavior research: a bibliometrics-based visualization analysis.亲环境行为研究的进展与趋势:基于文献计量学的可视化分析
Curr Psychol. 2023;42(8):6912-6932. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-01809-1. Epub 2021 Jun 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact assessment of land use change on surface temperature and agricultural productivity in Peshawar-Pakistan.土地利用变化对巴基斯坦白沙瓦地表温度和农业生产力的影响评估。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2019 Nov;26(32):33076-33085. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06448-5. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
2
Water resource management and public preferences for water ecosystem services: A choice experiment approach for inland river basin management.水资源管理与公众对水生态系统服务的偏好:内陆河流域管理的选择实验方法。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Jan 1;646:821-831. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.339. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
3
Existing agricultural ecosystem in China leads to environmental pollution: an econometric approach.
中国现有的农业生态系统导致了环境污染:一种计量经济学方法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Aug;25(24):24488-24499. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2461-9. Epub 2018 Jun 17.
4
Climate change and associated spatial heterogeneity of Pakistan: Empirical evidence using multidisciplinary approach.气候变化与巴基斯坦相关的空间异质性:多学科方法的实证证据。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Sep 1;634:95-108. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.170. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
5
The effects of individual, occupational, and supportive factors on successful return to work using a structural equation model.使用结构方程模型研究个人、职业和支持性因素对成功重返工作岗位的影响。
Ann Occup Environ Med. 2015 Aug 28;27:21. doi: 10.1186/s40557-015-0070-3. eCollection 2015.
6
Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: a review.影响环保关注和行为的个人和社会因素:综述。
Int J Psychol. 2014 Jun;49(3):141-57. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12034. Epub 2014 Jan 6.
7
Going green to be seen: status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation.走向绿色以被看见:地位、声誉和明显的保护。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Mar;98(3):392-404. doi: 10.1037/a0017346.
8
Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research.结构方程模型在心理学研究中的应用。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2000;51:201-26. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.201.