• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PEGASUS:一项促进乳房重建中共同决策的干预措施设计

PEGASUS: the Design of an Intervention to Facilitate Shared Decision-making in Breast Reconstruction.

作者信息

Clarke A, Paraskeva N, White P, Tollow P, Hansen E, Harcourt D

机构信息

Centre for Appearance Research, University of the West of England, Frenchay Campus, Cold Harbour Lane, Bristol, BS16 1QY, UK.

Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, Pond Street, London, NW3 2QG, UK.

出版信息

J Cancer Educ. 2021 Jun;36(3):508-518. doi: 10.1007/s13187-019-01656-6.

DOI:10.1007/s13187-019-01656-6
PMID:31994007
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8099795/
Abstract

Studies have found varying levels of satisfaction after breast reconstruction surgery with a substantial group of patients reporting some level of regret about their decision. The variable outcomes reported by women undergoing breast reconstruction surgery suggest a role for improved pre-operative communication and shared decision-making (SDM) between patient and health professional. Pragmatic approaches such as decision aids have been evaluated, but the aim of the Patient Expectations and Goals Assisting Shared Understanding of Surgery (PEGASUS) intervention is to facilitate closer interaction between the patient and clinical team. PEGASUS is a standardised two-stage process, in which patients' goals are first elicited, ranked in importance and recorded before being used to frame discussion and decision-making with the surgeon managing care. Following the Medical Research Council (MRC) model, feasibility and acceptability studies have already been reported and a 4-year multicentre randomised controlled trial of 180 participants is underway, (completion 2020). This paper therefore focuses on the design of the intervention itself, in line with recent advice that interventions, in comparison with evaluations, commonly lack a theoretical base and are often under reported. We report a retrospective application of the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour (COM-B) model to provide explicit detail of each step in the intervention design. This is intended to facilitate replication by other clinicians and to provide systematic guidance for others wishing to develop PEGASUS as a strategy for implementing SDM in other clinical populations. Trial Registration: ISRCTN 18000391 (DOI 10.1186/ISRCTN18000391) 27/01/2016.

摘要

研究发现,乳房重建手术后患者的满意度各不相同,相当一部分患者对自己的决定表示一定程度的后悔。接受乳房重建手术的女性所报告的不同结果表明,改善患者与医疗专业人员之间的术前沟通和共同决策(SDM)具有重要作用。诸如决策辅助工具等实用方法已得到评估,但患者期望与目标辅助手术共同理解(PEGASUS)干预措施的目的是促进患者与临床团队之间更密切的互动。PEGASUS是一个标准化的两阶段过程,首先引出患者的目标,按重要性排序并记录下来,然后用于与负责护理的外科医生进行讨论和决策。遵循医学研究理事会(MRC)模型,已经报告了可行性和可接受性研究,一项针对180名参与者的为期4年的多中心随机对照试验正在进行中(预计2020年完成)。因此,本文重点关注干预措施本身的设计,这与最近的建议一致,即与评估相比,干预措施通常缺乏理论基础且报告不足。我们报告了能力、机会、动机—行为(COM-B)模型的回顾性应用,以详细说明干预设计中每个步骤的具体细节。这旨在便于其他临床医生进行复制,并为希望将PEGASUS开发为在其他临床人群中实施SDM策略的其他人提供系统指导。试验注册:ISRCTN 18000391(DOI 10.1186/ISRCTN18000391)2016年1月27日。

相似文献

1
PEGASUS: the Design of an Intervention to Facilitate Shared Decision-making in Breast Reconstruction.PEGASUS:一项促进乳房重建中共同决策的干预措施设计
J Cancer Educ. 2021 Jun;36(3):508-518. doi: 10.1007/s13187-019-01656-6.
2
A study protocol of the effectiveness of PEGASUS: a multi-centred study comparing an intervention to promote shared decision making about breast reconstruction with treatment as usual.PEGASUS有效性的研究方案:一项多中心研究,比较一种促进乳房重建共同决策的干预措施与常规治疗。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Oct 2;17(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0543-0.
3
'They were aware of who I was as a person': Patients' and health professionals' experiences of using the PEGASUS intervention to facilitate decision-making around breast reconstruction.“他们了解我作为一个人的身份”:患者和健康专业人员在使用 PEGASUS 干预措施来促进乳房重建决策方面的经验。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2021 Sep;30(5):e13464. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13464. Epub 2021 May 24.
4
A multi-centred sequential trial comparing PEGASUS, an intervention to promote shared decision making about breast reconstruction with usual care.一项多中心序贯试验,比较了PEGASUS(一种促进乳房重建共同决策的干预措施)与常规护理。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2022 Apr;75(4):1342-1351. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.11.033. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
5
The acceptability of PEGASUS: an intervention to facilitate shared decision-making with women contemplating breast reconstruction.PEGASUS 的可接受性:一项促进有乳房重建意愿的女性共同决策的干预措施。
Psychol Health Med. 2016;21(2):248-53. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2015.1051059. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
6
Facilitating shared decision-making with breast augmentation patients: Acceptability of the PEGASUS intervention.促进与隆胸患者的共同决策:PEGASUS干预措施的可接受性。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017 Feb;70(2):203-208. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2016.11.013. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
7
What matters most: Randomized controlled trial of breast cancer surgery conversation aids across socioeconomic strata.最重要的是:跨越社会经济阶层的乳腺癌手术对话辅助工具的随机对照试验。
Cancer. 2021 Feb 1;127(3):422-436. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33248. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
8
The impact of an online patient decision aid for women with breast cancer considering immediate breast reconstruction: study protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled trial.一项针对考虑即刻乳房重建的乳腺癌女性的在线患者决策辅助工具的影响:一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Aug 19;19(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0873-1.
9
Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals.提高医疗保健专业人员采用共同决策的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12(5):CD006732. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006732.pub2.
10
Key Elements of Mammography Shared Decision-Making: a Scoping Review of the Literature.乳腺 X 线摄影共享决策的关键要素:文献的范围综述。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Oct;33(10):1805-1814. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4576-6. Epub 2018 Jul 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical decision-making regarding hearing and ear reconstruction in craniofacial microsomia: Exploring caregiver narratives.颅面微小畸形中听力与耳部重建的外科决策:探究照料者的叙述
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2025 May;53(5):642-650. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2025.01.019. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
2
Gothenburg Breast reconstruction (GoBreast) II protocol: a Swedish partially randomised patient preference, superiority trial comparing autologous and implant-based breast reconstruction.哥德堡乳房重建(GoBreast)II方案:一项瑞典的部分随机化患者偏好、优效性试验,比较自体组织和乳房假体植入式乳房重建。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 17;14(7):e084025. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084025.
3
The factors involved in surgical decision-making in younger women diagnosed with breast cancer in Aotearoa New Zealand: A qualitative analysis.新西兰奥特亚罗瓦地区年轻乳腺癌女性手术决策的相关因素:一项定性分析。
J Health Psychol. 2024 Mar 8;30(1):13591053241237075. doi: 10.1177/13591053241237075.
4
A Novel Digital Educational Strategy Improves Treatment Adherence and Quality of Life in Patients with Multiple Myeloma.一种新型数字教育策略可提高多发性骨髓瘤患者的治疗依从性和生活质量。
J Cancer Educ. 2024 Feb;39(1):50-57. doi: 10.1007/s13187-023-02374-w. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
5
Surgical Informed Consent: A Scoping Review of Physician-facing Decision Support Tools.手术知情同意书:面向医生的决策支持工具的范围综述
Ann Surg Open. 2023 Jan 30;4(1):e259. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000259. eCollection 2023 Mar.
6
Applying the behaviour change wheel to assess the theoretical underpinning of a novel smartphone application to increase physical activity in adults with spinal cord injuries.应用行为改变轮评估一款新型智能手机应用程序的理论基础,该应用旨在增加脊髓损伤成年人的身体活动。
Mhealth. 2023 Mar 17;9:10. doi: 10.21037/mhealth-22-52. eCollection 2023.
7
Development and implementation of a decision aid for post-mastectomy breast reconstruction for Japanese women with breast cancer: a field-testing study.开发并实施针对日本乳腺癌女性乳房再造术后的决策辅助工具:现场测试研究。
Breast Cancer. 2023 Jul;30(4):570-576. doi: 10.1007/s12282-023-01447-4. Epub 2023 Mar 18.
8
Invited Discussion on: The Impact of Reconstructive Modality and Postoperative Complications on Decision Regret and Patient-Reported Outcomes following Breast Reconstruction.受邀讨论:重建方式和术后并发症对乳房重建后决策后悔和患者报告结局的影响。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Apr;46(2):661-666. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02706-5. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
9
Shared Decision-Making in Breast Reconstruction for Breast Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review.乳腺癌患者乳房重建中的共同决策:一项范围综述
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Dec 10;15:2763-2781. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S335080. eCollection 2021.
10
Practitioners' views on shared decision-making implementation: A qualitative study.从业者对共同决策实施的看法:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 11;16(11):e0259844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259844. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Body image dissatisfaction in patients undergoing breast reconstruction: Examining the roles of breast symmetry and appearance investment.乳房重建患者的身体意象不满:检验乳房对称性和外观投入的作用。
Psychooncology. 2018 Mar;27(3):857-863. doi: 10.1002/pon.4586. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
2
A study protocol of the effectiveness of PEGASUS: a multi-centred study comparing an intervention to promote shared decision making about breast reconstruction with treatment as usual.PEGASUS有效性的研究方案:一项多中心研究,比较一种促进乳房重建共同决策的干预措施与常规治疗。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Oct 2;17(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0543-0.
3
The design of a theory-based intervention to improve medication adherence in chronic pain patients.一项基于理论的干预措施的设计,旨在提高慢性疼痛患者的药物依从性。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Jul;33(7):1293-1301. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1314955. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
4
A systematic review of decision aids for patients making a decision about treatment for early breast cancer.一项针对早期乳腺癌患者治疗决策辅助工具的系统评价。
Breast. 2016 Apr;26:31-45. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.12.007. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
5
Six steps in quality intervention development (6SQuID).质量干预开发的六个步骤(6SQuID)。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 May;70(5):520-5. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-205952. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
6
Helping patients to reach decisions regarding their treatment: Do 'non-directive' approaches cause systematic bias?帮助患者做出有关其治疗的决策:“非指导性”方法会导致系统性偏差吗?
Br J Health Psychol. 2015 Nov;20(4):877-88. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12150. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
7
The acceptability of PEGASUS: an intervention to facilitate shared decision-making with women contemplating breast reconstruction.PEGASUS 的可接受性:一项促进有乳房重建意愿的女性共同决策的干预措施。
Psychol Health Med. 2016;21(2):248-53. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2015.1051059. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
8
Shared Decision-Making in Cosmetic Medicine and Aesthetic Surgery.美容医学与美容外科中的共同决策
Aesthet Surg J. 2016 Jan;36(1):NP14-9. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjv107. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
9
Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance.复杂干预措施的过程评估:医学研究委员会指南。
BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1258.
10
Information giving and involvement in treatment decisions: is more really better? Psychological effects and relation with adherence.信息提供和参与治疗决策:更多真的更好吗?心理效应及其与依从性的关系。
Psychol Health. 2013;28(8):954-71. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2013.777964. Epub 2013 Mar 28.