Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Pain in Motion International Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Building F-KIMA, Laarbeeklaan 103, BE-1090 Brussels, Belgium; and Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, Chronic Pain Rehabilitation, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Pain in Motion International Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel; Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, Chronic Pain Rehabilitation, University Hospital Brussels; and Transcare Pain, Transdisciplinary Treatment Center, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Phys Ther. 2020 May 18;100(5):846-859. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa021.
Pain neuroscience education (PNE) and motivational interviewing (MI) have been widely implemented and tested in the field of chronic pain management, and both strategies have been shown to be effective in the short term (small effect sizes) for the management of chronic pain. PNE uses contemporary pain science to educate patients about the biopsychosocial nature of the chronicity of their pain experience. The goal of PNE is to optimize patients' pain beliefs/perceptions to facilitate the acquisition of adaptive pain-coping strategies. MI, on the other hand, is a patient-centered communication style for eliciting and enhancing motivation for behavior change by shifting the patient away from a state of indecision or uncertainty. Conceptually, PNE and MI appear to be complementary interventions, with complementary rather than overlapping effects; MI primarily improves cognitive and behavioral awareness and, potentially, adherence to treatment principles, whereas PNE potentially increases pain knowledge/beliefs, awareness, and willingness to explore psychological factors that are potentially associated with pain. Therefore, combining PNE with MI might lead to improved outcomes with larger and longer-lasting effect sizes. The combined use of PNE and MI in patients having chronic pain is introduced here, along with a description of how clinicians might be able to integrate PNE and MI in the treatment of patients experiencing chronic pain. Clinical trials are needed to examine whether combining PNE with MI is superior to PNE or MI alone for improving pain and quality of life in patients having chronic pain.
疼痛神经科学教育(PNE)和动机访谈(MI)已在慢性疼痛管理领域得到广泛应用和测试,这两种策略在短期(小效应量)内对慢性疼痛的管理都被证明是有效的。PNE 使用当代疼痛科学来教育患者关于慢性疼痛体验的生物心理社会性质。PNE 的目标是优化患者的疼痛信念/感知,以促进适应性疼痛应对策略的获得。另一方面,MI 是一种以患者为中心的沟通方式,通过将患者从犹豫不决或不确定的状态转移开来,引出并增强行为改变的动机。从概念上讲,PNE 和 MI 似乎是互补的干预措施,具有互补而非重叠的效果;MI 主要提高认知和行为意识,并可能提高对治疗原则的依从性,而 PNE 可能增加疼痛知识/信念、意识和探索与疼痛相关的潜在心理因素的意愿。因此,将 PNE 与 MI 相结合可能会导致更大和更持久的效果。本文介绍了将 PNE 与 MI 联合用于慢性疼痛患者,并描述了临床医生如何将 PNE 与 MI 整合到慢性疼痛患者的治疗中。需要进行临床试验来检验 PNE 与 MI 联合应用是否优于 PNE 或 MI 单独应用,以改善慢性疼痛患者的疼痛和生活质量。