From the Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Ont. (Akindolire, Morcos, Marsh, Howard, Lanting, Vasarhelyi); and the Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ont. (Akindolire, Morcos, Howard, Lanting, Vasarhelyi).
Can J Surg. 2020 Jan 29;63(1):E52-E56. doi: 10.1503/cjs.004219.
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is the third leading cause of total hip arthroplasty (THA) failure. Although controversial, 2-stage revision remains the gold standard treatment for PJI in most situations. To date, there have been few studies describing the economic impact of PJI in today’s health care environment. The purpose of the current study was to obtain an accurate estimate of the institutional cost associated with the management of PJI in THA and to assess the economic burden of PJI compared with primary uncomplicated THA.
We conducted a review of primary THA cases and 2-stage revision THA for PJI at our institution. Patients were matched for age and body mass index. All costs associated with each procedure were recorded. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the collected data. Mean costs, length of stay, clinic visits and readmission rates associated with the 2 cohorts were compared.
Fifty consecutive cases of revision THA were matched with 50 cases of uncomplicated primary THA between 2006 and 2014. Compared with the primary THA cohort, PJI was associated with a significant increase in mean length of hospital stay (26.5 v. 2.0 d, p < 0.001), mean number of clinic visits (9.2 v. 3.8, p < 0.001), number of readmissions (12 v. 1, p < 0.001) and average overall cost (Can$38 107 v. Can$6764, t = 8.3, p < 0.001).
Treatment of PJI is a tremendous economic burden. Our data suggest a 5-fold increase in hospital expenditure in the management of PJI compared with primary uncomplicated THA.
假体周围关节感染(PJI)是全髋关节置换术(THA)失败的第三大主要原因。尽管存在争议,但在大多数情况下,2 期翻修仍然是 PJI 的金标准治疗方法。迄今为止,很少有研究描述当今医疗保健环境中 PJI 的经济影响。本研究的目的是准确估计与 THA 中 PJI 管理相关的机构成本,并评估 PJI 与原发性单纯性 THA 相比的经济负担。
我们对我院的原发性 THA 病例和 2 期翻修 PJI 病例进行了回顾。患者按年龄和体重指数匹配。记录与每个程序相关的所有成本。使用描述性统计来总结收集的数据。比较两组的平均成本、住院时间、就诊次数和再入院率。
在 2006 年至 2014 年期间,50 例连续的翻修 THA 病例与 50 例单纯原发性 THA 病例相匹配。与原发性 THA 组相比,PJI 导致平均住院时间(26.5 天比 2.0 天,p < 0.001)、平均就诊次数(9.2 次比 3.8 次,p < 0.001)、再入院次数(12 次比 1 次,p < 0.001)和总平均成本(加元 38107 加元比加元 6764,t = 8.3,p < 0.001)显著增加。
治疗 PJI 是一个巨大的经济负担。我们的数据表明,与原发性单纯性 THA 相比,PJI 管理的住院支出增加了 5 倍。