• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

帮助精神病患者拓展社交网络:利益相关者的观点。

Helping people with psychosis to expand their social networks: the stakeholders' views.

机构信息

Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, (WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Services Development), Queen Mary University of London, Glen Road, London, E13 8SP, UK.

East London NHS Foundation Trust, Glen Road, London, E13 8SP, UK.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Jan 29;20(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-2445-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12888-020-2445-4
PMID:31996175
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6990576/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

People with psychosis experience more social isolation than any other diagnostic group and have smaller social networks than the general population. This isolation can have a detrimental effect on quality of life. No direct, standardised interventions have been developed to specifically target this issue. Stakeholders input appears crucial in the process of developing such an intervention. This study aimed to identify the main considerations when developing an intervention aiming to reduce social isolation in people with psychosis.

METHODS

Focus groups and individual interviews were conducted with patients, carers and mental health staff. Data was thematically analysed.

RESULTS

Thirty four patients with psychosis, 26 carers of people experiencing psychosis and 22 mental health professionals participated in the study. Suggested aspects to be considered in a novel intervention were: i) finding and training the right staff member; ii) discussing negative social attitudes and patients' previous negative experiences, iii) addressing personal ambivalence; iv) establishing how best to provide information about social activities; v) facilitating access to social activities, vi) striking a balance between support and independence.

CONCLUSION

The suggestions identified can help to develop more targeted approaches to reduce social isolation within this patient group. A patient-centred approach and generic communication skills appear to be underpinning most of the helpful elements identified, whilst specific techniques and skills can help to overcome negative past experiences and motivational barriers.

摘要

背景

精神病患者比其他任何诊断群体经历更多的社会孤立,并且社交网络比一般人群更小。这种孤立会对生活质量产生不利影响。目前尚未针对这一问题专门开发直接的、标准化的干预措施。利益相关者的投入在开发此类干预措施的过程中至关重要。本研究旨在确定旨在减少精神病患者社会隔离的干预措施的主要考虑因素。

方法

对患者、照顾者和精神卫生专业人员进行了焦点小组和个人访谈。对数据进行了主题分析。

结果

34 名精神病患者、26 名经历精神病的照顾者和 22 名精神卫生专业人员参加了这项研究。提出了新的干预措施需要考虑的方面:i)找到并培训合适的员工;ii)讨论负面的社会态度和患者以前的负面经历;iii)解决个人的矛盾心理;iv)确定如何最好地提供有关社会活动的信息;v)促进参与社会活动;vi)在支持和独立之间取得平衡。

结论

确定的建议有助于针对这一患者群体制定更有针对性的方法来减少社会隔离。以患者为中心的方法和通用沟通技巧似乎是确定的最有帮助的要素的基础,而特定的技术和技能可以帮助克服负面的过去经历和动机障碍。

相似文献

1
Helping people with psychosis to expand their social networks: the stakeholders' views.帮助精神病患者拓展社交网络:利益相关者的观点。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Jan 29;20(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-2445-4.
2
Social Isolation and Psychosis: Perspectives from People with Psychosis, Family Caregivers and Mental Health Professionals.社会隔离与精神病:精神病患者、家属照顾者和精神卫生专业人员的观点。
Community Ment Health J. 2022 Oct;58(7):1338-1345. doi: 10.1007/s10597-022-00941-x. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
3
Facilitating pathways to care: A qualitative study of the self-reported needs and coping skills of caregivers of young adults diagnosed with early psychosis.促进照护途径:一项定性研究报告,探讨了早期精神病诊断的年轻成年患者照顾者的自报需求和应对技能。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Aug;27(4):368-379. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12591. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
4
Social network intervention for loneliness and social isolation in a community setting: the PALS cluster-RCT.社区环境中针对孤独感和社交隔离的社交网络干预:PALS 整群随机对照试验
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Mar;13(1):1-86. doi: 10.3310/WTJH4379.
5
A longitudinal population-based study of carers of people with psychosis.一项针对精神疾病患者照顾者的纵向基于人群的研究。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2017 Jun;26(3):265-275. doi: 10.1017/S2045796015001195. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
6
Experiences of participation in an education and support group for carers of people with longer-term psychosis: a qualitative study.参与长期精神病患者照料者教育与支持小组的经历:一项定性研究
BMC Psychol. 2025 Feb 21;13(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02288-2.
7
A Multicomponent eHealth Intervention for Family Carers for People Affected by Psychosis: A Coproduced Design and Build Study.一项针对精神病患者家庭照顾者的多成分电子健康干预措施:一项联合设计与构建研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 6;21(8):e14374. doi: 10.2196/14374.
8
Effectiveness of online social networking interventions on social isolation and quality of life of people with psychosis: A systematic review.在线社交网络干预对精神病患者社会隔离和生活质量的有效性:系统评价。
Psychiatry Res. 2024 Sep;339:116088. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116088. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
9
Service user and carer experiences of seeking help for a first episode of psychosis: a UK qualitative study.服务使用者和照顾者在寻求首次精神病发作帮助方面的体验:英国的一项定性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2011 Sep 30;11:157. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-11-157.
10
Mental health and caregiving experiences of family carers supporting people with psychosis.精神健康与照顾精神病患者的家庭照顾者的经历。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2021 Jan 8;30:e3. doi: 10.1017/S2045796020001067.

引用本文的文献

1
Are COVID-19's restrictive measures associated with people's quality of life and the prevalence of anxiety and depression in Kinshasa in the Democratic Republic of Congo?刚果民主共和国金沙萨实施的新冠疫情限制措施是否与民众生活质量以及焦虑和抑郁的患病率有关?
J Public Health Afr. 2022 Oct 26;13(3):1728. doi: 10.4081/jphia.2022.1728. eCollection 2022 Sep 7.
2
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a structured social coaching intervention for people with psychosis (SCENE): protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项针对精神病患者的结构化社会辅导干预措施(SCENE)的有效性和成本效益:一项随机对照试验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 13;11(12):e050627. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050627.
3
Neighbourhood characteristics and social isolation of people with psychosis: a multi-site cross-sectional study.社区特征与精神病患者的社会隔离:一项多地点横断面研究。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2022 Sep;57(9):1907-1915. doi: 10.1007/s00127-021-02190-x. Epub 2021 Nov 17.

本文引用的文献

1
A Multicomponent eHealth Intervention for Family Carers for People Affected by Psychosis: A Coproduced Design and Build Study.一项针对精神病患者家庭照顾者的多成分电子健康干预措施:一项联合设计与构建研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 6;21(8):e14374. doi: 10.2196/14374.
2
Recovery in Psychosis from a Service User Perspective: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis of Current Qualitative Evidence.从服务使用者角度看精神病的康复:当前定性证据的系统评价与主题综合
Community Ment Health J. 2018 Aug;54(6):793-804. doi: 10.1007/s10597-017-0185-9. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
3
Social contacts and loneliness in people with psychotic and mood disorders.精神病和心境障碍患者的社会联系和孤独感。
Compr Psychiatry. 2016 Apr;66:59-66. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2015.12.008. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
4
Can mental health interventions change social networks? A systematic review.心理健康干预能否改变社交网络?一项系统综述。
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Nov 21;15:297. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0684-6.
5
Social networks of patients with psychosis: a systematic review.精神病患者的社交网络:一项系统综述。
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Oct 12;8:560. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1528-7.
6
The feasibility of implementing recovery, psychosocial and pharmacological interventions for psychosis: comparison study.对精神病实施康复、心理社会及药物干预措施的可行性:比较研究
Implement Sci. 2015 May 23;10:73. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0262-9.
7
Resource-oriented therapeutic models in psychiatry: conceptual review.精神医学中的资源导向治疗模式:概念综述。
Br J Psychiatry. 2014;204:256-61. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.135038.
8
Management of psychosis and schizophrenia in adults: summary of updated NICE guidance.成人精神病和精神分裂症的管理:NICE最新指南总结
BMJ. 2014 Feb 12;348:g1173. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1173.
9
Social network intervention in patients with schizophrenia and marked social withdrawal: a randomized controlled study.社交网络干预对伴有明显社会退缩症状的精神分裂症患者的随机对照研究。
Can J Psychiatry. 2013 Nov;58(11):622-31. doi: 10.1177/070674371305801108.
10
Social isolation: a predictor of mortality comparable to traditional clinical risk factors.社会隔离:可预测死亡率的因素,与传统临床风险因素相当。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Nov;103(11):2056-62. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301261. Epub 2013 Sep 12.