• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对精神病患者家庭照顾者的多成分电子健康干预措施:一项联合设计与构建研究。

A Multicomponent eHealth Intervention for Family Carers for People Affected by Psychosis: A Coproduced Design and Build Study.

作者信息

Sin Jacqueline, Henderson Claire, Woodham Luke A, Sesé Hernández Aurora, Gillard Steve

机构信息

Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.

School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 6;21(8):e14374. doi: 10.2196/14374.

DOI:10.2196/14374
PMID:31389333
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6701165/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Psychosis, including schizophrenia, is the most common severe mental illness affecting 1% of the population worldwide. A large number of people provide long-term support and care for a relative with psychosis. Although psychoeducational interventions, especially those delivered through a face-to-face group format, have an established evidence base for improving the caregiving experience, well-being, and health outcomes, large-scale implementation and access remain limited. There is a demand for such provision to be made through the internet for greater flexibility and wider access.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to integrate participatory research methodologies by the public, patients, and carers into the eHealth (electronic health) intervention design and build process to improve the product's usability and acceptability.

METHODS

We adapted a structured eHealth intervention build method to include participatory research activities involving key stakeholders and end users to co-design and coproduce our intervention. An expert advisory group (EAG) comprising public involvement members led the formative design and build work using an agile build process. Carers independent from the study were consulted on the evolving drafts of the intervention prototype through focus group meetings. These results were fed back into the intervention build work continuously to ensure end users' input inform every stage of the process.

RESULTS

An EAG comprising individuals with lived experience of psychosis, carers, health care professionals, researchers, voluntary organization workers, and eLearning experts (n=14) was established. A total of 4 coproduction workshops were held over 1 year during which the alpha and beta prototypes were designed and built through the participatory research work. Alongside this, 2 rounds of focus group study with carers (n=24, in 4 groups) were conducted to seek consultation on end users' views and ideas to optimize the intervention design and usability. Finally, the EAG carried out a Web-based walk-through exercise on the intervention prototype and further refined it to make it ready for an online usability test. The final product contains multiple sections providing information on psychosis and related caregiving topics and interactive discussion forums with experts and peers for psychosocial support. It provides psychoeducation and psychosocial support for carers through the internet, promoting flexible access and individualized choices of information and support.

CONCLUSIONS

The participatory research work led to the coproduction of a eHealth intervention called COPe-support (Carers fOr People with Psychosis e-support). We believe the study methodology, results, and output have optimized the intervention design and usability, fitting the end users' needs and usage pattern. COPe-support is currently being tested for its effectiveness in promoting carers' health outcome through an online randomized controlled trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN89563420; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN89563420.

摘要

背景

精神病,包括精神分裂症,是最常见的严重精神疾病,影响着全球1%的人口。大量人员为患有精神病的亲属提供长期支持和照料。尽管心理教育干预措施,尤其是通过面对面小组形式提供的干预措施,在改善照料体验、幸福感和健康结果方面有既定的证据基础,但大规模实施和获取仍然有限。人们需要通过互联网提供此类服务,以获得更大的灵活性和更广泛的获取途径。

目的

本研究旨在将公众、患者和照料者的参与式研究方法纳入电子健康干预设计和构建过程,以提高产品的可用性和可接受性。

方法

我们调整了一种结构化的电子健康干预构建方法,纳入涉及关键利益相关者和最终用户的参与式研究活动,以共同设计和共同生产我们的干预措施。一个由公众参与成员组成的专家咨询小组(EAG)使用敏捷构建过程领导了形成性设计和构建工作。通过焦点小组会议,就干预原型的不断演变的草稿征求了与该研究无关的照料者的意见。这些结果不断反馈到干预构建工作中,以确保最终用户的意见贯穿于过程的每个阶段。

结果

成立了一个由有精神病生活经历的个人、照料者、医疗保健专业人员、研究人员、志愿组织工作者和电子学习专家(n = 14)组成的专家咨询小组。在1年的时间里共举办了4次共同生产研讨会,在此期间通过参与式研究工作设计并构建了alpha和beta原型。与此同时,对照料者(n = 24,分4组)进行了2轮焦点小组研究,以征求关于最终用户的意见和想法,以优化干预设计和可用性。最后,专家咨询小组对干预原型进行了基于网络的预演练习,并进一步完善,使其准备好进行在线可用性测试。最终产品包含多个部分,提供有关精神病和相关照料主题的信息,以及与专家和同行的互动讨论论坛,以提供心理社会支持。它通过互联网为照料者提供心理教育和心理社会支持,促进信息和支持的灵活获取以及个性化选择。

结论

参与式研究工作促成了一种名为COPe-support(精神病患者照料者电子支持)的电子健康干预措施的共同生产。我们相信该研究方法、结果和产出优化了干预设计和可用性,符合最终用户的需求和使用模式。目前正在通过一项在线随机对照试验测试COPe-support在促进照料者健康结果方面的有效性。

试验注册

ISRCTN注册库ISRCTN89563420;http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN89563420 。

相似文献

1
A Multicomponent eHealth Intervention for Family Carers for People Affected by Psychosis: A Coproduced Design and Build Study.一项针对精神病患者家庭照顾者的多成分电子健康干预措施:一项联合设计与构建研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 6;21(8):e14374. doi: 10.2196/14374.
2
Perceived Acceptability and Experiences of a Digital Psychoeducation and Peer Support Intervention (COPe-support): Interview Study With Carers Supporting Individuals With Psychosis.数字心理教育和同伴支持干预(COPe-support)的可接受性和体验:对支持精神病患者的照顾者的访谈研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 2;24(2):e27781. doi: 10.2196/27781.
3
COPe-support - a multi-component digital intervention for family carers for people affected by psychosis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.COPe-支持 - 一种针对受精神病影响人群的家庭照顾者的多组件数字干预措施:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 17;20(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02528-w.
4
Usability evaluation of an eHealth intervention for family carers of individuals affected by psychosis: A mixed-method study.针对受精神病影响个体的家庭照料者的电子健康干预措施的可用性评估:一项混合方法研究。
Digit Health. 2019 Aug 28;5:2055207619871148. doi: 10.1177/2055207619871148. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
5
Moderated online social therapy for carers of young people recovering from first-episode psychosis: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.针对首次发作精神病康复期青少年照料者的线上社交适度疗法:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Jan 17;18(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1775-5.
6
Effect of digital psychoeducation and peer support on the mental health of family carers supporting individuals with psychosis in England (COPe-support): a randomised clinical trial.英格兰数字心理教育和同伴支持对支持精神病患者的家庭照顾者心理健康的影响(COPe-support):一项随机临床试验。
Lancet Digit Health. 2022 May;4(5):e320-e329. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00031-0. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
7
Mental health and caregiving experiences of family carers supporting people with psychosis.精神健康与照顾精神病患者的家庭照顾者的经历。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2021 Jan 8;30:e3. doi: 10.1017/S2045796020001067.
8
Understanding and addressing factors affecting carers' mental health during end-of-life caregiving: synopsis of meta synthesis of literature and stakeholder collaboration.理解并应对临终护理期间影响照料者心理健康的因素:文献综合分析与利益相关者合作概述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Feb;13(8):1-27. doi: 10.3310/RTHW8493.
9
Involving carer advisors in evidence synthesis to improve carers' mental health during end-of-life home care: co-production during COVID-19 remote working.让护理顾问参与证据综合工作以改善临终居家护理期间护理人员的心理健康:新冠疫情远程工作期间的共同制作。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Oct;13(8):1-48. doi: 10.3310/TGHH6428.
10
Experiences of participation in an education and support group for carers of people with longer-term psychosis: a qualitative study.参与长期精神病患者照料者教育与支持小组的经历:一项定性研究
BMC Psychol. 2025 Feb 21;13(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02288-2.

引用本文的文献

1
: Participatory Action Research with family carers and a Recovery College.与家庭照顾者及康复学院开展的参与式行动研究
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 15;16:1607560. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1607560. eCollection 2025.
2
Examining Challenges to Co-Design Digital Health Interventions With End Users: Systematic Review.审视与终端用户共同设计数字健康干预措施所面临的挑战:系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 14;27:e50178. doi: 10.2196/50178.
3
Psychosocial Interventions in the Rehabilitation and the Management of Psychosis and Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review on Digitally-Delivered Interventions.

本文引用的文献

1
Co-production from proposal to paper.从提案到论文的共同创作。
Nature. 2018 Oct;562(7725):29-31. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-06861-9.
2
Informal Caregivers' Experiences and Perceptions of a Web-Based Peer Support Network: Mixed-Methods Study.非正式护理人员对基于网络的同伴支持网络的体验与认知:混合方法研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Aug 28;20(8):e257. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9895.
3
Barriers to and Facilitators of Engagement With Remote Measurement Technology for Managing Health: Systematic Review and Content Analysis of Findings.参与远程测量技术管理健康的障碍与促进因素:系统评价及研究结果的内容分析
精神病和精神分裂症康复与管理中的心理社会干预:关于数字交付干预的系统评价
Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2025 Mar;53(2):379-421. doi: 10.62641/aep.v53i2.1851.
4
Comparison of the four co-created interventions to improve snacking and physical activity behaviour in European adolescents: the SEEDS project.欧洲青少年改善零食和身体活动行为的四种共同设计干预措施的比较:SEEDS项目
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 1;25(1):829. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22091-x.
5
Investigating the Best Practices for Engagement in Remote Participatory Design: Mixed Methods Analysis of 4 Remote Studies With Family Caregivers.探究远程参与式设计中的最佳实践:对四项与家庭照顾者开展的远程研究的混合方法分析
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 3;26:e60353. doi: 10.2196/60353.
6
A methodology to evaluate the effectiveness of interprofessional education strategies based on the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework among vocational healthcare students in China.一种基于医学研究理事会(MRC)框架评估中国职业卫生保健专业学生跨专业教育策略有效性的方法。
MethodsX. 2024 Sep 27;13:102988. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2024.102988. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
Citizen involvement in research on technological innovations for health, care or well-being: a scoping review.公民参与健康、护理或福祉技术创新研究:范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Sep 2;22(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01152-4.
8
A Digital Microintervention Supporting Evidence-Based Parenting Skills: Development Study Using the Agile Scrum Methodology.一种支持循证育儿技能的数字微干预措施:采用敏捷Scrum方法的开发研究
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Jun 28;8:e54892. doi: 10.2196/54892.
9
Internet-based psychoeducation and support programme for relatives of young people with early psychosis: results of the first German-language intervention.针对早期精神病青年患者亲属的基于互联网的心理教育与支持项目:首个德语干预措施的结果
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jan 16;15:1248526. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1248526. eCollection 2024.
10
Strategies to Alleviate the Burden Experienced by Informal Caregivers of Persons With Severe Mental Disorders in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Scoping Review.减轻低收入和中等收入国家严重精神障碍患者非正式照料者负担的策略:范围综述
Interact J Med Res. 2024 Jan 18;13:e48587. doi: 10.2196/48587.
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jul 12;20(7):e10480. doi: 10.2196/10480.
4
Impact of Internet-Based Interventions on Caregiver Mental Health: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基于互联网的干预措施对照顾者心理健康的影响:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jul 3;20(7):e10668. doi: 10.2196/10668.
5
The Development of Delta: Using Agile to Develop a Decision Aid for Pediatric Oncology Clinical Trial Enrollment.德尔塔的开发:运用敏捷方法开发儿科肿瘤临床试验入组决策辅助工具。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 May 4;7(5):e119. doi: 10.2196/resprot.9258.
6
eHealth interventions for family carers of people with long term illness: A promising approach?电子健康干预措施在长期病患照顾者中的应用:一种有前景的方法?
Clin Psychol Rev. 2018 Mar;60:109-125. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2018.01.008. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
7
Optimizing patient and public involvement (PPI): Identifying its "essential" and "desirable" principles using a systematic review and modified Delphi methodology.优化患者和公众参与(PPI):使用系统评价和改良 Delphi 方法确定其“必要”和“期望”原则。
Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):327-335. doi: 10.1111/hex.12618. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
8
Protocol for an online randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder: Relatives Education And Coping Toolkit (REACT).一项在线随机对照试验的方案,旨在评估针对精神病或双相情感障碍患者亲属的同伴支持自我管理干预措施(亲属教育与应对工具包,REACT)的临床效果和成本效益。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 18;7(7):e016965. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016965.
9
Effectiveness of psychoeducational interventions for family carers of people with psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.心理教育干预对精神疾病患者家属的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2017 Aug;56:13-24. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.05.002. Epub 2017 May 29.
10
Web-Based Psychoeducation Program for Caregivers of First-Episode of Psychosis: An Experience of Chinese Population in Hong Kong.基于网络的首次发作精神病患者照顾者心理教育项目:香港华人的经验。
Front Psychol. 2016 Dec 26;7:2006. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02006. eCollection 2016.