School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, Myddelton Street Building, 1 Myddelton Street, LondonEC1R 1UW, England, UK.
Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Stadium House, 68 Wood Lane, LondonW12 7RH, England, UK.
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2021 Jan 8;30:e3. doi: 10.1017/S2045796020001067.
Family carers supporting an individual with psychosis often experience poorer mental health, however, little is known about specific risk factors among these carers. We investigated the associations between demographic, caregiving characteristics and mental health outcomes in family carers supporting an individual with psychosis and compared carers' outcomes with general population norms.
We analysed baseline data from the COPe-support randomised controlled trial of online psychoeducation and peer support for adult carers supporting an individual with psychosis between 2018 and 2020. We collected carers' demographic and health outcome data, including wellbeing using Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS as primary outcome), quality of life using EQ-5D-5L and caregiving experience assessed with Experience of Caregiving Inventory. We tested associations between carers' demographic and caregiving characteristics for each outcome in turn and meta-analysed carers' WEMWBS and EQ-5D-5L with Health Survey England (HSE) general population data from 2016 and 2017, respectively.
The 407 carers of people with psychosis had a mean WEMWBS score of 42.2 (s.d. 9.21) and their overall weighted pooled WEMWBS score was 7.3 (95% confidence interval (CI) -8.6 to -6.0, p < 0.01) lower than the HSE general population sample, indicating carers have poorer mental wellbeing by more than double the minimum clinically important difference of 3 points on WEMWBS. Among all caring relationships, partners had poorer wellbeing compared to parents with lower WEMWBS score (-6.8, -16.9 to 3.3, p = 0.03). Single carers had significantly poorer wellbeing (-3.6, -5.6 to -1.5, p < 0.01) and a more negative caregiving experience than those who were cohabiting. Spending more than 35 h per week caregiving increased carers' negative experience significantly (p = 0.01).
Carers of people with psychosis have poorer mental health than non-carers. Partners, lone carers and those spending more than 35 h per week on caring were found to be most at risk of poor mental health. Based on the results, we advocate that the details of carers for individuals with psychosis should be added to the existing carers or severe mental illness registers at all general practitioner surgeries and for their wellbeing screened routinely. Future large-scale prospective studies are needed to develop a predictive model to determine risk factors, hence to aid early identification of carers' support needs. Such understandings are also useful to inform tailored intervention development.
照顾患有精神疾病的个体的家庭照顾者通常会经历更差的心理健康状况,但对于这些照顾者的具体风险因素知之甚少。我们调查了家庭照顾者在支持患有精神疾病的个体方面的人口统计学和照顾特征与心理健康结果之间的关联,并将照顾者的结果与一般人群的正常值进行了比较。
我们分析了 2018 年至 2020 年间针对支持患有精神疾病的成年人的在线心理教育和同伴支持的 COPe-支持随机对照试验的基线数据。我们收集了照顾者的人口统计学和健康结果数据,包括使用 Warwick-Edinburgh 心理健康量表(WEMWBS 作为主要结果)评估的幸福感、使用 EQ-5D-5L 评估的生活质量以及使用经验照顾量表评估的照顾经验。我们依次测试了照顾者的人口统计学和照顾特征与每个结果之间的关联,并分别使用 2016 年和 2017 年英格兰健康调查(HSE)的一般人群数据对照顾者的 WEMWBS 和 EQ-5D-5L 进行了荟萃分析。
407 名照顾精神疾病患者的人平均 WEMWBS 得分为 42.2(标准差 9.21),他们的整体加权汇总 WEMWBS 得分为 7.3(95%置信区间(CI)-8.6 至-6.0,p <0.01)低于 HSE 一般人群样本,这表明照顾者的心理健康水平比 WEMWBS 的最小临床重要差异 3 分差两倍以上。在所有照顾关系中,与父母相比,伴侣的幸福感较低(-6.8,-16.9 至 3.3,p = 0.03)。单身照顾者的幸福感明显较差(-3.6,-5.6 至-1.5,p <0.01),照顾体验也比同居者更消极。每周照顾超过 35 小时会显著增加照顾者的负面体验(p = 0.01)。
患有精神疾病的个体的照顾者的心理健康状况比非照顾者差。伴侣、单身照顾者和每周照顾超过 35 小时的人被发现最有可能出现心理健康不良。基于这些结果,我们主张在所有全科医生手术中为现有照顾者或严重精神疾病登记册中添加患有精神疾病的个体的照顾者的详细信息,并定期对其进行幸福感筛查。需要进行大规模的前瞻性研究来开发预测模型以确定风险因素,从而有助于早期确定照顾者的支持需求。这种理解对于制定有针对性的干预措施也很有用。